Le 09/03/2023 à 12:11, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
On 2023-03-09 08:33:08 +0100, Yvan Masson wrote:
I might be the same issue indeed. A temporary workaround I have just found
is to run KDE on Wayland. But I suppose it is not possible with FVWM.
In any case, I sometimes need to run remote X appli
On 2023-03-09 04:19:22 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> FYI, my bug reports for Firefox 110, with some details on the
> behavior I get:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1820542
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032428
Now it appears that this bug is actually a F
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 03:34:05PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> > AFAIK, "apt full-upgrade" is for stable to the next stable,
> >> > not for testing and unstable (one typically resolves conflicts
> >> > interactively).
> >>
> >> Interesting. I don't use `apt` but "full-upgrade" is what I've
On 2023-03-09 15:34:05 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> > AFAIK, "apt full-upgrade" is for stable to the next stable,
> >> > not for testing and unstable (one typically resolves conflicts
> >> > interactively).
> >>
> >> Interesting. I don't use `apt` but "full-upgrade" is what I've been
> >> us
>> > AFAIK, "apt full-upgrade" is for stable to the next stable,
>> > not for testing and unstable (one typically resolves conflicts
>> > interactively).
>>
>> Interesting. I don't use `apt` but "full-upgrade" is what I've been
>> using with testing for the last 20 years, first with `apt-get` the
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 10:40:14AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > AFAIK, "apt full-upgrade" is for stable to the next stable,
> > not for testing and unstable (one typically resolves conflicts
> > interactively).
>
> Interesting. I don't use `apt` but "full-upgrade" is what I've been
> using wi
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:57:12 +0100
Yvan Masson wrote:
Hello Yvan,
>Yes, I did that, but thanks for the suggestion.
NP. Shame it didn't help.
>
>As I do not always use X11, I am thinking that maybe my issue has begun
>on a previous update…
Always a possibility.
Another possibility is that, so
Le 09/03/2023 à 12:40, Brad Rogers a écrit :
On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 18:02:42 +0100
Yvan Masson wrote:
Hello Yvan,
Thanks for your insights,
You have a lot of Plasma related updates there. Have you;
Logged out and back in?
or
Rebooted?
Yes, I did that, but thanks for the suggestion.
As I do
> AFAIK, "apt full-upgrade" is for stable to the next stable,
> not for testing and unstable (one typically resolves conflicts
> interactively).
Interesting. I don't use `apt` but "full-upgrade" is what I've been
using with testing for the last 20 years, first with `apt-get` then with
`aptitude`.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 18:02:42 +0100
Yvan Masson wrote:
Hello Yvan,
>Thanks for your insights,
You have a lot of Plasma related updates there. Have you;
Logged out and back in?
or
Rebooted?
I found I had a few issues after the upgrade from 5.26 to 5.27. A
reboot solved some of them (update coi
On 2023-03-09 04:32:05 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 4:06 AM Timothy Butterworth <
> timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Try running apt fully upgrade
> >
> `sudo apt full-upgrade` sorry about that my tablet auto-corrected.
AFAIK, "apt full-upgrade" is for
On 2023-03-09 08:33:08 +0100, Yvan Masson wrote:
> I might be the same issue indeed. A temporary workaround I have just found
> is to run KDE on Wayland. But I suppose it is not possible with FVWM.
In any case, I sometimes need to run remote X applications
transparently, so Wayland is not an optio
On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 04:32 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 4:06 AM Timothy Butterworth <
> timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Try running apt fully upgrade
> >
> `sudo apt full-upgrade` sorry about that my tablet auto-corrected.
And it broke threading.
-
/2023 à 04:19, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> > On 2023-03-08 18:02:42 +0100, Yvan Masson wrote:
> >> Using testing with KDE, I have an issue since last update: for many QT
> >> applications and some GTK applications, menus (File, Edit…) or even
> >> drop-down li
TK applications, menus (File, Edit…) or even
>> drop-down lists are difficult to trigger (Moste often I need to click and
>> then press Alt). I would like to ensure this bug has already been reported
>> (which might not has it has already entered testing), but I don't know
Le 09/03/2023 à 04:19, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
On 2023-03-08 18:02:42 +0100, Yvan Masson wrote:
Using testing with KDE, I have an issue since last update: for many QT
applications and some GTK applications, menus (File, Edit…) or even
drop-down lists are difficult to trigger (Moste often I
On 2023-03-08 18:02:42 +0100, Yvan Masson wrote:
> Using testing with KDE, I have an issue since last update: for many QT
> applications and some GTK applications, menus (File, Edit…) or even
> drop-down lists are difficult to trigger (Moste often I need to click and
> then press A
Hi Debian users,
Using testing with KDE, I have an issue since last update: for many QT
applications and some GTK applications, menus (File, Edit…) or even
drop-down lists are difficult to trigger (Moste often I need to click
and then press Alt). I would like to ensure this bug has already
On Thu 09 Dec 2021 at 09:09:42 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 12/08/2021 06:33 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I have a machine set aside for experimenting with different
> > configurations of Debian. The default Grub2 menu will display
> > OS(with version) and partition designation in /dev/sdXY
On Thu 09 Dec 2021 at 09:09:42 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 12/08/2021 06:33 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I have a machine set aside for experimenting with different
> > configurations of Debian. The default Grub2 menu will display OS(with
> > version) and partition designation in /dev/sdXY
On Wed 08 Dec 2021 at 12:16:49 (-0500), songbird wrote:
> Richard Owlett wrote:
> ...
> > I see no reference for Grub being able to read a partition's label only
> > its UUID.
>
> i don't use UUIDs (LABELS only) so i do this in /etc/default/grub:
>
> =
> # Uncomment if you don't want GRUB
On 12/08/2021 06:33 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
I have a machine set aside for experimenting with different
configurations of Debian. The default Grub2 menu will display OS(with
version) and partition designation in /dev/sdXY format.
I give all partitions descriptive labels.
I want the Grub menu
Richard Owlett wrote:
...
> I see no reference for Grub being able to read a partition's label only
> its UUID.
i don't use UUIDs (LABELS only) so i do this in /etc/default/grub:
=
# Uncomment if you don't want GRUB to pass "root=UUID=xxx" parameter to Linux
GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_UUID=true
==
*note* No need for CC: I'm subscribed
On 12/08/2021 08:29 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
I have a machine set aside for experimenting with different configurations
of Debian. The default Grub2 menu will display OS(with version) and
partition designation in /dev/sdXY format.
I giv
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have a machine set aside for experimenting with different configurations
> of Debian. The default Grub2 menu will display OS(with version) and
> partition designation in /dev/sdXY format.
>
> I give all partitions descriptive labels.
> I want the Grub menu to display OS
I have a machine set aside for experimenting with different
configurations of Debian. The default Grub2 menu will display OS(with
version) and partition designation in /dev/sdXY format.
I give all partitions descriptive labels.
I want the Grub menu to display OS and the partition label.
I want
t;>> want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus.
>>>
>>> Without deleting the offending applications from the system, how can I
>>> delete those menu entries and replace them with links to suitable
>>> applications.
>>
>&g
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 10:42:59PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 07/04/2020 07:38 AM, n...@dismail.de wrote:
[...]
> >MATE has graphical editor for this. If not already installed, the package
> >is named "mozo" as is the tool itself.
>
> How would one discover that? I've silently been grumbl
ing a mess of applications I rarely
want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus.
Without deleting the offending applications from the system, how can I
delete those menu entries and replace them with links to suitable
applications.
MATE has graphical editor for this. If n
On 4/7/20 11:10 pm, Peter Ehlert wrote:
On 7/4/20 4:53 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop.
The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I
rarely want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus.
Without de
talling a mess of applications I
> > > rarely
> > > want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus.
> > >
> > > Without deleting the offending applications from the system, how can I
> > > delete those menu entries and replace them with lin
On 07/04/2020 07:38 AM, n...@dismail.de wrote:
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:53:56 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop.
The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I rarely
want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications
On 7/4/20 4:53 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop.
The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I
rarely want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus.
Without deleting the offending applications from the s
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:53:56 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop.
> The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I rarely
> want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus.
>
> Witho
I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop.
The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I
rarely want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus.
Without deleting the offending applications from the system, how can I
delete those menu entries a
ppear to be named encrypted in the
> directory /home/user/.cache/menus.
>
> So I have two queries:
> (1) What are the roles of these two files?
Anything in a directory named cache or .cache should be presumed
to be temporary storage that the user can reasonably delete at
any time. The progr
to be named encrypted in the
directory /home/user/.cache/menus.
So I have two queries:
(1) What are the roles of these two files?
(2) How do I remove shotwell and keep only shotwell-viewer in the
"Right Click/Open With" option.
Regards,
Rajib
(Rajib Bandopadhyay)
A Debian and Knoppix user
ot appear to be installed by default. The debian menu structure
is still there though as part of the lxde menu (kinda gets confusing
that).
I do think that some free software naming conventions makes it very hard
to work out what a program actually does alacarte is not immediately
associated with
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 20:19:07 +0100
Paul Sutton wrote:
> To reply to my previous post. I did a little more digging and have
> produced a 2nd blog post with the results :
>
> http://zleap.net/lxde-menu-2/
>
> Still got a few questions presented at the end. At least there is a
> nice menu editor
To reply to my previous post. I did a little more digging and have
produced a 2nd blog post with the results :
http://zleap.net/lxde-menu-2/
Still got a few questions presented at the end. At least there is a nice
menu editor which I will have a deeper look at later.
Hope this helps
Paul
On 1
Hi All
Not sure if this is a 'feature' or 'bug'
I am using Debian 10 and LXDE desktop, trying to edit the menu all i
get from the settings is a browse dialogue box to change the picture
that appears on the LXDE menu.
I have made a blog post to illustrate this
http://zleap.net/lxde-menu/
How e
Hi folks,
I installed a new application (not from repo), and there is a *.desktop file in
/usr/share/applications.
But I the new application does not appear in the menus of plasma5/kde.
How can I force, to recreate the menus in plasma5? I tried "update-menus",
"kbuildsycoca5
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:21:35AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> > Do you mean to suggest that you know that this bug is confirmed to exist
> > in Debian and has already been reported?
>
> Yes, that is. See here:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851748
Great! (that it's reported, th
> Do you mean to suggest that you know that this bug is confirmed to exist
> in Debian and has already been reported?
Yes, that is. See here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851748
You can test it this way:
1. Move ~/.config/menus* somewhere
2. Start LXDE, no more me
The first thing to establish is does this bug actually exist in Debian.
That doesn't mean knowing that it is present in an upstream version that
Debian carries, it means someone has to verify the bug in person with the
installed package.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:50AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> Sear
Am Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017, 23:57:59 CET schrieb kamaraju kusumanchi:
> Update from which version to which version? What version of LXDE shows
> this bug? Can you provide a link to the kali-linux bug report?
See here:
https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=3822
>
> > Do the LXDE developers know of th
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Hans wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it looks like there is a bug in famous LXDE. After an update all menus are
> gone. There is already filed a bugreport to kali-linux, but I want to mention
> it for debian, too.
Update from which version to which version?
Hi all,
it looks like there is a bug in famous LXDE. After an update all menus are
gone. There is already filed a bugreport to kali-linux, but I want to mention
it for debian, too.
If LXDE users did not not notice it, then it is because of cached files. If you
move ~/.cache/* away, then the
some added nostalgia with the Win
> 9x-era rendering of the icons and menus!
:-) That is good news. Perseverance pays off.
Lisi
> With thanks,
>
> > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:29:21 +0100
> > From: Lisi Reisz
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >
n the libreoffice-kde package. Rather than install the -gtk3 package
as many suggested, I instead removed the -kde package. Now things seem
to be work normally.
As an added bonus, I'm getting some added nostalgia with the Win
9x-era rendering of the icons and menus!
With thanks,
> Date: Fri, 2
. I also tried
> switching the LibreOffice themes between Breeze and Galaxy to no help.
> The icons change but the toolbar rendering stays broken. If I knew
> more about how LibreOffice renders the toolbar and menus, I could try
> other programs that share those libraries to isolate the i
On 07/27/2016 05:19 PM, Borden Rhodes wrote:
Good afternoon, list,
I'm running an up-to-date Stretch operating system on a ca. 2010 Intel
laptop chipset. I noticed last night that the toolbars and menus
aren't rendering correctly. I dumped a PNG here:
I had a similar problem w
Borden Rhodes wrote:
> Lisi: is there some other place where I can upload a PNG file and have
> it display/transfer properly? Other than Instagram where I don't have
> an account?
I'm not Lisi, but this one is especially meant for forums, therefore
rather suitable IMO: https://postimage.org/
Seems to run normally for me.
> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:41:25 +0100
> From: Lisi Reisz
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: LibreOffice toolbars & menus are rendering badly
> Message-Id: <201607272241.25292.lisi.re...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: Text/Pla
On 07/27/2016 05:19 PM, Borden Rhodes wrote:
Good afternoon, list,
I'm running an up-to-date Stretch operating system on a ca. 2010 Intel
laptop chipset. I noticed last night that the toolbars and menus
aren't rendering correctly.
Can you run glxgears?? Sounds more like a video dr
On Wednesday 27 July 2016 22:19:22 Borden Rhodes wrote:
> If you can't load
> the photo (because it's converted into plain text), the problem is
> that the taskbar background shows artefacts from other windows.
I see a large number of back lozenges with ? in them, interspersed with a
small number
Good afternoon, list,
I'm running an up-to-date Stretch operating system on a ca. 2010 Intel
laptop chipset. I noticed last night that the toolbars and menus
aren't rendering correctly. I dumped a PNG here:
http://paste.debian.net/785668 (good for 3 days). If you can't load
the
On 2016-02-03 21:56, Brad Rogers wrote:
> The d/l link is greyed out, and clicking it repeats the OS warning
> and asks me if I wish to d/l for either Mac OS or Windows OS. Not
> that I have a need to try the extension in any case, as I can read
> the menus well en
Sorry about the apparent attribution to Lisi in my last post.
Even though the crowsfeet ('>') were absent from the post, it
must be adjudged wrong by any decent standard.
Can I have a last cigarette before disposition of sentence? It's
been over fifteen years now.
--
Bob Bernstein
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Yes. I have in place what I believe is a different add-on,
titled "Font Size." As noted, it only changes fonts in the page
itself, not in menus, etc. It works quite nicely, i.e. as
advertised.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon
On Wednesday 03 February 2016 20:56:56 Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 21:13:43 +0100
> Andreas Weber wrote:
>
> Hello Andreas,
>
> >On 2016-02-02 23:11, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >>> Iirc, that changes fonts only in the displayed page, not in the
> >>
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 21:13:43 +0100
Andreas Weber wrote:
Hello Andreas,
>On 2016-02-02 23:11, Brad Rogers wrote:
>>> Iirc, that changes fonts only in the displayed page, not in the
>>> menus, dialogs, etc.
>Not true. It does exactly what you need, everywhere.
Please b
On 2016-02-02 23:11, Brad Rogers wrote:
>> Iirc, that changes fonts only in the displayed page, not in the
>> menus, dialogs, etc.
Not true. It does exactly what you need, everywhere.
> However, the Mozilla site tells me it's not compatible with my OS
> which is odd
Bob Bernstein composed on 2016-02-01 18:37 (UTC-0500):
> amd64 Jessie running icewm here w/o systemd.
> I know how to tweak font sizes for displayed web pages, but how
> do I do that for the apparatus of the browser window itself?
Traditional upstream method applicable regardless of distro or D
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:07:15 -0500 (EST)
Bob Bernstein wrote:
Hello Bob,
>Iirc, that changes fonts only in the displayed page, not in the
>menus, dialogs, etc.
A quick click on the link suggests that your memory isn't correct.
However, the Mozilla site tells me it's not compa
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Andreas Weber wrote:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/
is maybe what you've been looking for.
Iirc, that changes fonts only in the displayed page, not in the
menus, dialogs, etc.
Best,
--
Bob Bernstein
On 2016-02-02 00:37, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> I know how to tweak font sizes for displayed web pages, but how do I do
> that for the apparatus of the browser window itself?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/
is maybe what you've been looking for.
HTH, ändu
Siard:
> Bob Holtzman:
> > Siard:
> > > That is a GTK2 setting. Font and font size can be set in
> > > ~/.gtkrc-2.0, it should contain a line like this:
> > >
> > > gtk-font-name = "Sans 11"
> > >
> > > I have "Liberation Sans 11" myself.
> >
> > That would be great if only I had that file in
Bob Holtzman:
> Siard:
> > That is a GTK2 setting. Font and font size can be set in
> > ~/.gtkrc-2.0, it should contain a line like this:
> >
> > gtk-font-name = "Sans 11"
> >
> > I have "Liberation Sans 11" myself.
>
> That would be great if only I had that file in my Jessie install.
> Runnin
Bob Holtzman [2016-02-02 11:28:22-07] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 01:16:35AM +0100, Siard wrote:
>> That is a GTK2 setting. Font and font size can be set in
>> ~/.gtkrc-2.0, it should contain a line like this:
>>
>> gtk-font-name = "Sans 11"
>
> That would be great if only I had that file in
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 01:16:35AM +0100, Siard wrote:
> Bob Bernstein wrote:
> > amd64 Jessie running icewm here w/o systemd.
> >
> > I know how to tweak font sizes for displayed web pages, but how
> > do I do that for the apparatus of the browser window itself?
>
> That is a GTK2 setting. Fon
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 00:34:15 Bob Bernstein wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Siard wrote:
> > That is a GTK2 setting. Font and font size can be set in ~/.gtkrc-2.0,
> > it should contain a line like this:
> >
> > gtk-font-name = "Sans 11"
> >
> > I have "Liberation Sans 11" myself.
>
> Excellen
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Siard wrote:
That is a GTK2 setting. Font and font size can be set in ~/.gtkrc-2.0,
it should contain a line like this:
gtk-font-name = "Sans 11"
I have "Liberation Sans 11" myself.
Excellent!
(By my count this is Big Dummy Question #3,745 for Debian lists.)
Well
Bob Bernstein wrote:
> amd64 Jessie running icewm here w/o systemd.
>
> I know how to tweak font sizes for displayed web pages, but how
> do I do that for the apparatus of the browser window itself?
That is a GTK2 setting. Font and font size can be set in ~/.gtkrc-2.0,
it should contain a line
amd64 Jessie running icewm here w/o systemd.
I know how to tweak font sizes for displayed web pages, but how
do I do that for the apparatus of the browser window itself?
(By my count this is Big Dummy Question #3,745 for Debian
lists.)
--
Bob Bernstein
On Wednesday 12 August 2015 02:01:57 Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> Sorry Lise,
>
> I guess I'm not very careful reader. You are still on Wheezy. Then it is
> even simpler. open gconf-editor and set menu-have-icons to 0 in
> gnome.desktop.interface.
>
> If it wasn't just mild sarcasm.
No, it wasn't. I
Sorry Lise,
I guess I'm not very careful reader. You are still on Wheezy. Then it is
even simpler. open gconf-editor and set menu-have-icons to 0 in
gnome.desktop.interface.
If it wasn't just mild sarcasm.
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 22:46:47 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 11 August 2015
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 22:46:47 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 22:37:09 Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>> Everybody has those icons or nobody knows how to get them back? I
>> wonder...
>
> If/when someone answers, could he/she include a recipe for getting rid
> of these same icons? W
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 01:40:48 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just installed Jessie with GNOME3 on my laptop. Everything is just
> > wonderful except Iceweasel does not have any icons in its menus. Their
> > missing, in particular in Bookm
Everybody has those icons or nobody knows how to get them back? I
wonder...
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 01:40:48 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed Jessie with GNOME3 on my laptop. Everything is just
> wonderful except Iceweasel does not have any icons in its
Hi,
I just installed Jessie with GNOME3 on my laptop. Everything is just
wonderful except Iceweasel does not have any icons in its menus. Their
missing, in particular in Bookmarks menu, makes working with bookmarks
organized by folders visually very uncomfortable.
The old option menu-have
Anyone know if the old gnome2 style tear-off menus is possible with xfce?
TIA
Zenaan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caosgnsrtzztc0l
d:
Update your gnome to the latest version (for debian the latest stable
would be on wheezy right now), then proceed to delete all configuration
related to gnome to reset your menus to default.
Best regards,
Felix
On 20.11.2013 22:36, Jörg Wynands wrote:
Hi Felix,
found your post because
Hi Felix,
found your post because i have the identical problem. Maybe you found a
solution meanwhile?
Best regards
Jörg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debi
Felix Winterhalter, 19.01.2013:
> Hey there everyone,
>
> I just installed debian wheezy and I get the following problem with
> gdm3: Every time I login the menu items are added again (to the
> already existing items) and the clock is added and the logout menu
> is also added as is the workspace s
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:11:45 +0100, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:33:40 +0100, Felix Winterhalter
wrote:
Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/PfWgl0f.png
It's good that you did add the screenshot, since it's the GNOME3 panel
and not GDM, GNOME's display manager.
I'm not using GN
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:33:40 +0100, Felix Winterhalter
wrote:
Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/PfWgl0f.png
It's good that you did add the screenshot, since it's the GNOME3 panel and
not GDM, GNOME's display manager.
I'm not using GNOME3, but IIRC to access the panel settings, you have to
pu
Hey there everyone,
I just installed debian wheezy and I get the following problem with
gdm3: Every time I login the menu items are added again (to the already
existing items) and the clock is added and the logout menu is also added
as is the workspace switcher and the taskbar ... So after 3 l
which I "produced" since
> > >> > then, using devede and k9copy have empty menus. That means: the
> > >> > menufile plays in a way that I can see the progess-bar e.g. in
> > >> > Kaffeine but the menu does not show up so I can't chose a video
il something else was
> upgraded.
> Again that's why I suspect libraries or "helper"-programs.
I would center the problem in devede and its related libraries because
k9copy does not looks like a program to make the DVD menus but for
mastering the final copy.
>> > Right now
On Thursday 10 May 2012 11:22:08 Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:33:07 -0400, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:45:41 Camaleón wrote:
> (...)
>
> >> > Only later I realized that all my DVDs, which I "produced" since
> >> &g
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:22:08PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> Then maybe is that something have changed in between. I mean, are you
> using the same versions of "k9copy" and "devede" that you were using
> before you reinstalled the system? :-?
You can use "/var/log/dpkg.log" to check.
--
"Religi
On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:33:07 -0400, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:45:41 Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> > Only later I realized that all my DVDs, which I "produced" since
>> > then, using devede and k9copy have empty menus. That means: the
>> >
realized that all my DVDs, which I "produced" since then,
> > using devede and k9copy have empty menus. That means: the menufile plays
> > in a way that I can see the progess-bar e.g. in Kaffeine but the menu
> > does not show up so I can't chose a video nor can I mak
t; I decided to start afresh and reinstalled wheezy and to just copy over
> my /home and some adjustments I made to /etc. Everything fine - so I
> thought.
>
> Only later I realized that all my DVDs, which I "produced" since then,
> using devede and k9copy have empty menus.
thing fine - so I thought.
Only later I realized that all my DVDs, which I "produced" since then, using
devede and k9copy have empty menus. That means: the menufile plays in a way
that I can see the progess-bar e.g. in Kaffeine but the menu does not show up
so I can't chose a vi
Hi,
I don't have another VGA card available, but as I said this is already
happening on two (counting Steve, three) completely independent machines, so
I'd say we can rule the hardware out ;-)
Indeed I can not see the garbage in Firefox, but I will have to test again
when the system is under lo
On Tuesday 30 August 2011 19:13:40 Camaleón wrote:
>
> Have you both considered in opening a bug report at Debian BTS for
> this? :-?
>
I checked if a bug report had already been filed in the Debian or KDE BTS.
I found nothing therefore opened this one :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:48:26 +0200, Steve B wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2011 12:49:49 Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:02:57 +0200, Ralf Jung wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> > Now I wonder, which package do I have to report the bug against? It
>> > can hardly be the driver, but it could be e
On Tuesday 30 August 2011 12:49:49 Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:02:57 +0200, Ralf Jung wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> > Now I wonder, which package do I have to report the bug against? It can
> > hardly be the driver, but it could be everything else in the graphics
> > stack, as far as I can te
1 - 100 of 597 matches
Mail list logo
