Re: use udev (was Re: Max number of ide disk atteched)

2004-03-25 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:15:07PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:07:41PM +, Pigeon wrote: > | On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:25:27PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > | > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:12:43PM +, Pigeon wrote: > [...] > | > | Is this automatic

Re: use udev (was Re: Max number of ide disk atteched)

2004-03-24 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:07:41PM +, Pigeon wrote: | On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:25:27PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: | > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:12:43PM +, Pigeon wrote: [...] | > | Is this automatic with Debian kernel packages? With a DIY 2.6 I had to | > | create /sys and mount

Re: use udev (was Re: Max number of ide disk atteched)

2004-03-24 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:25:27PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:12:43PM +, Pigeon wrote: > | On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:48:43PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > | > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:18:59PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > | > | "Derrick 'dman' Hud

Re: use udev (was Re: Max number of ide disk atteched)

2004-03-24 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:12:43PM +, Pigeon wrote: | On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:48:43PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: | > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:18:59PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: | > | "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | | > | > The thing with udev is it is al

Re: use udev (was Re: Max number of ide disk atteched)

2004-03-24 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:48:43PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:18:59PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > | "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | > The thing with udev is it is all userspace, therefore it works with > | > any 2.6 kernel (that ha

use udev (was Re: Max number of ide disk atteched)

2004-03-24 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:18:59PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: | "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > The thing with udev is it is all userspace, therefore it works with | > any 2.6 kernel (that has SYSFS in it). You can upgrade udev without | > touching your kernel, unlike de

Re: Max number of ide disk atteched

2004-03-23 Thread Paul Johnson
"Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The thing with udev is it is all userspace, therefore it works with > any 2.6 kernel (that has SYSFS in it). You can upgrade udev without > touching your kernel, unlike devfs. I've been using udev for a few > weeks now (since 0.18 arrived in

Re: Max number of ide disk atteched

2004-03-23 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:04:03AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: | Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:24:31AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: | >> Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >> > On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:53:14 -0800 | >> > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Max number of ide disk atteched

2004-03-23 Thread Paul Johnson
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:24:31AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: >> Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:53:14 -0800 >> > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> When did devfs become deprecated? >> > >> > With the 2.6

Re: Max number of ide disk atteched

2004-03-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:24:31AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:53:14 -0800 > > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> When did devfs become deprecated? > > > > With the 2.6 kernels. > > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/61490/ >

Re: Max number of ide disk atteched

2004-03-23 Thread Paul Johnson
Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:53:14 -0800 > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Brian Brazil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > One option is devfs - which is deprecated but works fine. >> >> When did devfs become deprecated? > > With the 2.6 kernels.

Re: Max number of ide disk atteched

2004-03-22 Thread Chris Metzler
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:53:14 -0800 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brian Brazil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > One option is devfs - which is deprecated but works fine. > > When did devfs become deprecated? With the 2.6 kernels. http://lwn.net/Articles/61490/ (look under "th

Re: Max number of ide disk atteched

2004-03-22 Thread Paul Johnson
Brian Brazil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One option is devfs - which is deprecated but works fine. When did devfs become deprecated? -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian. Because it *must* work. debian.org about

RE: Max number of ide disk atteched

2004-03-22 Thread Lukovszki Csaba
In the case kernel identified ide controllers: cd /dev ./MAKEDEV hdi ./MAKEDEV hdk -Original Message- From: Lukovszki Csaba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Max number of ide disk atteched Dear Debian Users, Since I

Re: Max number of ide disk atteched

2004-03-22 Thread Brian Brazil
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 12:14:17PM +0100, Lukovszki Csaba wrote: > Dear Debian Users, > > Since I have attached numerous disk to my server with debian lunux > running on it, I had to face to the problem, my last devide is /dev/hdh. > Unfortunatelly, I could not access to other two drives /dev/hdi

Max number of ide disk atteched

2004-03-22 Thread Lukovszki Csaba
Dear Debian Users, Since I have attached numerous disk to my server with debian lunux running on it, I had to face to the problem, my last devide is /dev/hdh. Unfortunatelly, I could not access to other two drives /dev/hdi and /dev/hdk. Could anybody help how can I set up it to be viewable. Thank