Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Claudius Hubig wrote: > bash(1) does not appear to mention $@. It does but unfortunately it mentions it as a variable named @ and not as $@ making it difficult to search. This problem has been discussed upstream for instance here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-12/msg00097.htm

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Mitchell Laks wrote: > I see now that unless less is invoked with the -q option i will get > the sound. > ... > and that successfully shut up sound on less and pager > but it did not shut up sound for man. > > I still have a beepy noisy man. Camaleón posted what I think is a better solution but

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote: > Andrei POPESCU wrote: >>On Jo, 01 mar 12, 18:02:40, Claudius Hubig wrote: >>> >>> #!/bin/sh >>> /bin/less -q $* >> >>I've read somewhere that "$@" (including the quotes) is safer in such >>situations. > > That’s also what keeps lingering in

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote: > > /bin/lessq (I would actually suggest using /usr/local/bin/lessq) Better, yes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: htt

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Mitchell Laks wrote: >> Yes, this all the result of the alternatives "system". >> >> Is it "/usr/bin/pager" or "/usr/pager"? > > yes it is "/usr/bin/pager" > >  "/usr/pager" does not exist on my systems I meant to write "/bin/pager" and "/usr/bin/lessq" below...

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Claudius Hubig
Dom wrote: >On 01/03/12 20:40, Claudius Hubig wrote: >> Andrei POPESCU wrote: >>> On Jo, 01 mar 12, 18:02:40, Claudius Hubig wrote: ->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->-> #!/bin/sh /bin/less -q $* >>> I've read somewhere that "$@" (including the quotes)

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Dom
On 01/03/12 20:40, Claudius Hubig wrote: Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Jo, 01 mar 12, 18:02:40, Claudius Hubig wrote: ->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->-> #!/bin/sh /bin/less -q $* I've read somewhere that "$@" (including the quotes) is safer in such situations. T

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Claudius Hubig
Andrei POPESCU wrote: >On Jo, 01 mar 12, 18:02:40, Claudius Hubig wrote: >> >> ->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->-> >> #!/bin/sh >> /bin/less -q $* > >I've read somewhere that "$@" (including the quotes) is safer in such >situations. That’s also what keeps lingerin

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 01 mar 12, 18:02:40, Claudius Hubig wrote: > > ->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->-> > #!/bin/sh > /bin/less -q $* I've read somewhere that "$@" (including the quotes) is safer in such situations. Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian use

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Mitchell Laks
On 18:02 Thu 01 Mar , Claudius Hubig wrote: > That’s because you only set this variable to your shell and did not > export it. Observe: that was what i wanted to know. now i see that export makes it available to programs. > would then contain something like: > > ->->->->->->->->->->->->->->

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Claudius Hubig
Mitchell Laks wrote: >however putting >PAGER="less -q" >alone seemed to set the variable (ie echo $PAGER >responded less -q) > >but it did not change the behavior of say "man pdl" That’s because you only set this variable to your shell and did not export it. Observe: ->->->->->->->->->->->->->-

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-03-01 Thread Mitchell Laks
> Because PAGER isn't set by default. > > You can set it in "/etc/environment" or "~/.bashrc" or "~/.profile". ok i put the line export PAGER="less -q" in the .bash_aliases file (or in .bashrc) and that worked. however putting PAGER="less -q" alone seemed to set the variable (ie echo $PAGER re

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-02-29 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Mitchell Laks wrote: > On 19:01 Wed 29 Feb     , Sven Joachim wrote: >> This is because .inputrc is only honored by programs that use readline, >> and the standard pager does not use that. >> >> > how to get rid of this? >> >> Make sure that less (the standard p

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-02-29 Thread Mitchell Laks
On 19:01 Wed 29 Feb , Sven Joachim wrote: > > This is because .inputrc is only honored by programs that use readline, > and the standard pager does not use that. > > > how to get rid of this? > > Make sure that less (the standard pager) is invoked with the "-q" > option. E.g. set PAGER="/us

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-02-29 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:29:29 -0500, Mitchell Laks wrote: > Dear Gurus, Not a guru here, but will try to earn some points, tron. > I like silence. +100 :-) > While running a tty console > (no X running) > I include in .inputrc > the line > set bell-style visible > > this is clearly respected

Re: not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-02-29 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-02-29 18:29 +0100, Mitchell Laks wrote: > I like silence. > > While running a tty console > (no X running) > I include in .inputrc > the line > set bell-style visible > > this is clearly respected by say the > tab command on an empty line (no beep, just a flash) > however > when i do

not in X. man command does not respect set bell-style visible

2012-02-29 Thread Mitchell Laks
Dear Gurus, I like silence. While running a tty console (no X running) I include in .inputrc the line set bell-style visible this is clearly respected by say the tab command on an empty line (no beep, just a flash) however when i do man anything say man bash and then reach the end of the b

Re: Man command unresponsive

2005-05-06 Thread Bill Marcum
t;man -w ls", do you get a file name, and does that file exist? If all else fails, you might try reinstalling the man command with "apt-get install man-db". (I'm not using 3.0 anymore, so I'm not quite sure if man-db is the correct package name). If you are using a German

Man command unresponsive

2005-05-05 Thread Matthew Schultz
When I type man and nothing else I get "What manual page do you want?" so the command is there and working I would deduce. However when I type "man ls" or any other command, there is no output at all. I've seached google groups but found nothing to help point me in the right direction. I'm runn

Re: bash: man: command not found

2001-07-25 Thread Shriram Shrikumar
thank you, that worked if only m$ bugs were fixed this easily or quickly. --- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shriram Shrikumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >--- Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:34:01PM -0700, Shriram Shrikumar > wrote: > >> > was

Re: bash: man: command not found

2001-07-25 Thread Colin Watson
Shriram Shrikumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >--- Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:34:01PM -0700, Shriram Shrikumar wrote: >> > was missing man-db, however, on trying to install, it shows the >> > following error message >> > >> > trying to overwrite directory '

Re: bash: man: command not found

2001-07-24 Thread Shriram Shrikumar
--- Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:34:01PM -0700, Shriram Shrikumar wrote: > > was missing man-db, however, on trying to install, it shows the > > following error message > > > > trying to overwrite directory '/usr/share/locale/de' in package > > texinfo with

Re: bash: man: command not found

2001-07-24 Thread Mike
Shriram Shrikumar wrote: > Hi all, > > wonder if someone can help me. was playing around with dselect trying > to fix a package dependency issue, removed 2 many packages and now it > says that 'man' can no longer be found. error message as in subject > > what needs to be installed for man ? It i

Re: bash: man: command not found

2001-07-24 Thread Joost Kooij
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:34:01PM -0700, Shriram Shrikumar wrote: > was missing man-db, however, on trying to install, it shows the > following error message > > trying to overwrite directory '/usr/share/locale/de' in package > texinfo with nondirectory > > any ideas ? Can you give more error o

Re: bash: man: command not found

2001-07-24 Thread Richard Cobbe
Lo, on Tuesday, July 24, Joost Kooij did write: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:55:43PM -0700, Shriram Shrikumar wrote: > > wonder if someone can help me. was playing around with dselect trying > > to fix a package dependency issue, removed 2 many packages and now it > > says that 'man' can no longer

Re: bash: man: command not found

2001-07-24 Thread Shriram Shrikumar
--- Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:55:43PM -0700, Shriram Shrikumar wrote: > > wonder if someone can help me. was playing around with dselect > trying > > to fix a package dependency issue, removed 2 many packages and > now it > > says that 'man' can no longer

bash: man: command not found

2001-07-24 Thread Shriram Shrikumar
Hi all, wonder if someone can help me. was playing around with dselect trying to fix a package dependency issue, removed 2 many packages and now it says that 'man' can no longer be found. error message as in subject what needs to be installed for man ? Thanks for your help Shri _

Re: bash: man: command not found

2001-07-24 Thread Joost Kooij
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:55:43PM -0700, Shriram Shrikumar wrote: > wonder if someone can help me. was playing around with dselect trying > to fix a package dependency issue, removed 2 many packages and now it > says that 'man' can no longer be found. error message as in subject > > what needs to

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-23 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 04:41:21AM -, john smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > I was just wondering...I don't know if this topic is for this list > but...is there a book or link somewhere that gives easier examples of > how to do the correct syntax for "man" something. I find that the

Re: "man" command made easy? ->vim

2001-07-17 Thread florentin ionescu
uot; will give more details.There was a recent talk on e-mail-list(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vim/message/19141) about the small diferences between perl regex and vim regex. From: D-Man To: debian-user@lists.debian.org CC: Dave Sherohman Subject: Re: "man" command made easy? Date

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-17 Thread Leonard Stiles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joost Kooij) writes: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:35:30PM +0200, Leonard Stiles wrote: > > Even vi is an overkill here, let alone an advanced editor:-) > > > > #!/bin/sh > Even easier: > > install package dwww, point browser to: > http://localhost/dwww Pshaw¹! Thats chea

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-16 Thread Eric G. Miller
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:02:31PM -0400, D-Man wrote: [snip] > Thanks. Actually, I'm not 100% sure that vim supports backreferences > like that (the \1 in the replacement text). I know that Python's and > Perl's regex engines do. I think I've heard/read that vim does do > backreferences. Yes.

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-16 Thread Paul Mackinney
Rebecca Dridan uttered: > > And for those who, like me, don't like the key bindings in info, check out > pinfo, apt-get install pinfo. Thanks, Bec. I don't much like the Info bindings. (Don't like Lynx too much either, but I'd rather learn as few sets of keybindings as possible...) Paul

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-16 Thread D-Man
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:41:01PM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote: | D-Man uttered: | > | > [I haven't been following most of this thread, but] | > | > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:59:23AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote: | > | Night before last I ran 'find /usr/doc -name "index.html" >foo.txt' and | > |

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-16 Thread Rebecca Dridan
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:59:23AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote: > All that Will said about the man pages is true, and I completely agree > about the need for examples; I to have wasted hours fighting syntax > errors, all the while with an ugly feeling that I might not even be > trying the right com

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-16 Thread Paul Mackinney
D-Man uttered: > > [I haven't been following most of this thread, but] > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:59:23AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote: > | Night before last I ran 'find /usr/doc -name "index.html" >foo.txt' and > | then spent 2 hours adding links from foo.txt to my local home/start > > 2 hou

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-16 Thread Joost Kooij
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:35:30PM +0200, Leonard Stiles wrote: > Even vi is an overkill here, let alone an advanced editor:-) > > #!/bin/sh [snip] Even easier: install package dwww, point browser to: http://localhost/dwww Cheers, Joost

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-16 Thread Leonard Stiles
D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [I haven't been following most of this thread, but] > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:59:23AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote: > | Night before last I ran 'find /usr/doc -name "index.html" >foo.txt' and > | then spent 2 hours adding links from foo.txt to my local home

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-16 Thread D-Man
[I haven't been following most of this thread, but] On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:59:23AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote: | Night before last I ran 'find /usr/doc -name "index.html" >foo.txt' and | then spent 2 hours adding links from foo.txt to my local home/start 2 hours!? Wow. Learn vi(m) or some

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-16 Thread Paul Mackinney
All that Will said about the man pages is true, and I completely agree about the need for examples; I to have wasted hours fighting syntax errors, all the while with an ugly feeling that I might not even be trying the right command or option. General advice based on things I've done: 1. Use less

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-16 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 10:25:10PM -0500, will trillich wrote: > caveat -- if your VCR is still blinking 12:00 then you're not > ready for linux... Good thing mine blinks --:-- instead... > and sometimes there's no documentation at all... but that's > rare. (even the most self-satisfied programme

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-14 Thread will trillich
caveat -- if your VCR is still blinking 12:00 then you're not ready for linux... On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 04:41:21AM -, john smith wrote: > Hi, > > I was just wondering...I don't know if this topic is for this > list but...is there a book or link somewhere that gives easier > examples of how t

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-14 Thread mark
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 12:14:30PM +0200, Joost Kooij wrote: > > FILES >Woman does not keep any files, but remembers everything you type. In addition, multiple instances of woman have an extensive shared memory implementation. > > BUGS >There are no bugs. Woman

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-14 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 04:41:21AM -, john smith wrote: > Hi, > > I was just wondering...I don't know if this topic is for this list but...is > there a book or link somewhere that gives easier examples of how to do the > correct syntax for "man" something. This probably won't be any problems

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-14 Thread Nathan Weston
You might want to check out linuxnewbie.org. It has a lot of newbie-oriented howtos. It's not as fine granularity as manpages, but will help with a lot of basic tasks, and has some great forums. I would also suggest the book "Linux in a Nutshell" from O'Reilly. This is actually very close to wh

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-14 Thread Joost Kooij
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 04:41:21AM -, john smith wrote: > I was just wondering...I don't know if this topic is for this list but...is > there a book or link somewhere that gives easier examples of how to do the > correct syntax for "man" something. This probably won't be any problems to > yo

Re: "man" command made easy?

2001-07-14 Thread Erik Steffl
john smith wrote: > > Hi, > > I was just wondering...I don't know if this topic is for this list but...is > there a book or link somewhere that gives easier examples of how to do the > correct syntax for "man" something. This probably won't be any problems to > you unix gurus out there but if I w

"man" command made easy?

2001-07-13 Thread john smith
Hi, I was just wondering...I don't know if this topic is for this list but...is there a book or link somewhere that gives easier examples of how to do the correct syntax for "man" something. This probably won't be any problems to you unix gurus out there but if I wanted to do something and I d

Re: Man command

2000-07-21 Thread Andreas Hetzmannseder
> Is there somewhere where I can download "man" (the manual > command) from the Internet? You can download "man-db", "manpages" and "manpages-dev"(as well as any other package) via ftp (e.g. ftp://ftp.xy.debian.org - for "xy" insert a country-code). You find these files in the ./debian/dists/stabl

Re: Man command

2000-07-20 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:23:37PM +1200, Patrick Howden wrote: > Hello I'm a newbie to Debian and I am having some problems with > getting it to work properly (not many, but just a few). I can't find > the "man" command on my system anywhere. This means that I can

Re: Man command

2000-07-20 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
Do man man, or info man Patrick Howden wrote: > Hello I'm a newbie to Debian and I am having some problems with getting it to > work properly (not many, but just a few). I can't find the "man" command on > my system anywhere. This means that I can't read inst

Man command

2000-07-20 Thread Patrick Howden
Hello I'm a newbie to Debian and I am having some problems with getting it to work properly (not many, but just a few). I can't find the "man" command on my system anywhere. This means that I can't read instructins for any packages which I download. Is there somewhere

Re: how do I find which deb pakage contains man command?

2000-06-11 Thread Dietmar
> Geengun Guim wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > How can I find which deb pakage contains man command? > > > > okebary:~/okebary-sys-conf# man securetty > > bash: man: command not found > > > > I'd like to know about login as root. So I ran

Re: how do I find which deb pakage contains man command?

2000-06-11 Thread Dean
ry a simple man command like "man ls" to see if you get a response. Also "info" has a lot better information at least in potato. Dean Geengun Guim wrote: > Hi all, > > How can I find which deb pakage contains man command? > > okebary:~/okebary-sys-conf# man sec

Re: how do I find which deb pakage contains man command?

2000-06-11 Thread kmself
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 06:00:05PM +0900, Geengun Guim wrote: > Hi all, > > How can I find which deb pakage contains man command? > > okebary:~/okebary-sys-conf# man securetty > bash: man: command not found dpkg -S /usr/bin/man man-db: /usr/bin/man You want to install

how do I find which deb pakage contains man command?

2000-06-11 Thread Geengun Guim
Hi all, How can I find which deb pakage contains man command? okebary:~/okebary-sys-conf# man securetty bash: man: command not found I'd like to know about login as root. So I ran man securetty. But command not found. So I'd like to install man. But I cannot find which deb paka

RE: where is "man" command

1998-11-04 Thread Shaleh
man-db I think ttyS0 == com1 ttyS1 == com2 and so on ps/2 mice is /dev/psaux On 04-Nov-98 puzzle12 wrote: > hi there, > i installed debian 2.0 and got some (in fact A LOT) of .deb s > and their man pages! but cant find a pkg which has the "man" program!! > can any one let me know which deb pkg t

where is "man" command

1998-11-04 Thread puzzle12
hi there, i installed debian 2.0 and got some (in fact A LOT) of .deb s and their man pages! but cant find a pkg which has the "man" program!! can any one let me know which deb pkg to download which has it ? also,   what is the port /dev/ttySx for mouse ? thanks sriram

Re: Mounting /fd0 (Was Re: Base2_0.tgz missing man command.)

1998-10-23 Thread Jim
mount /dev/fd0 /floppy/ seems to do the trick. Is there a script I can set up that would run fdflush every time I want to access the floppy? Thanks, Jim Ole J. Tetlie wrote: > *-Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > | Now, I find that when trying to mount /fd0 I get the error "can't find > /fd0 in

Re: Mounting /fd0 (Was Re: Base2_0.tgz missing man command.)

1998-10-23 Thread Ole J. Tetlie
*-Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | Now, I find that when trying to mount /fd0 I get the error "can't find /fd0 in /etc/mtab | or /etc/fstab | I have edited /etc/fstab to include this line... | /dev/fd0 /floppyauto noauto,sync 0 0 | as per the instructions I found at www.de

Re: Configure PCMCIA *FIRST* (Was Re: Base2_0.tgz missing man command.)

1998-10-22 Thread Pann McCuaig
On Thu, Oct 22, 1998 at 05:40:25PM +, Jim wrote: > Gosh I wish I had this when I started! Now, as I installed on a laptop and > configured from default menu choice "Configure Device Driver Modules" first, > and configured PCMCIA second, which might explain why my serial ports don't > initializ

Configure PCMCIA *FIRST* (Was Re: Base2_0.tgz missing man command.)

1998-10-22 Thread Jim
Gosh I wish I had this when I started! Now, as I installed on a laptop and configured from default menu choice "Configure Device Driver Modules" first, and configured PCMCIA second, which might explain why my serial ports don't initialize (boy am I getting an education) I am thinking re-install? W

Mounting /fd0 (Was Re: Base2_0.tgz missing man command.)

1998-10-22 Thread Jim
I see, I must have been confused when the archive tried to open man and found it wasn't there. I wonder then why is the reference to man in the archive at all. Thank you for your help. And thank everyone for your help. This is a lively group! Now, I find that when trying to mount /fd0 I get t

Re: Base2_0.tgz missing man command.

1998-10-22 Thread David Wright
le file. > > I have downloaded another copy of base2_0.tgz from > ftp://ftp.dti.ad.jp/.1/Linux/debian/hamm/hamm/disks-i386/2.0.10_1998-07-17/base2_0.tgz > > and found that it too is missing the command files. > > I say they are missing because when I install the system the man co

Re: Base2_0.tgz missing man command.

1998-10-22 Thread Stephen J. Carpenter
mm/disks-i386/2.0.10_1998-07-17/base2_0.tgz > > and found that it too is missing the command files. > > I say they are missing because when I install the system the man command > is not present on the drive. Also, when I unzip the files on my WIn95 > machine Winzip encounters error

Re: Base2_0.tgz missing man command.

1998-10-22 Thread Ole J. Tetlie
*-Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | Hi. I'm new to the group and to Linux. Hello, and welcome :-) | I have installed Debian on my 486 laptop from Dos with files from | ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/disks-i386/current/ | and have found base2_0.tgz is missing the man executable file. Tha

Base2_0.tgz missing man command.

1998-10-22 Thread Jim
m ftp://ftp.dti.ad.jp/.1/Linux/debian/hamm/hamm/disks-i386/2.0.10_1998-07-17/base2_0.tgz and found that it too is missing the command files. I say they are missing because when I install the system the man command is not present on the drive. Also, when I unzip the files on my WIn95 machine Winzip encou

Re: I can config man-db, the man command is unavaliable.

1998-10-19 Thread Alan Tam
I've just installed man-db and manpages from the following URL http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/doc/ follow the instructions, then man command IS avaliable with comfort. Alan Tam. ayin wrote: > Dear Sir > > When I install the man-db package , the dselect utility tell me t

Re: I can config man-db, the man command is unavaliable.

1998-10-16 Thread Torsten Hilbrich
On: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 16:53:15 +0800 ayin writes: > > Dear Sir > When I install the man-db package , the dselect utility tell me that > I should have groff. But groff need libg++272. > > The problem is that I have installed libg++272( the dselect show > installed) , but the groff item still shows

I can config man-db, the man command is unavaliable.

1998-10-15 Thread ayin
Dear Sir When I install the man-db package , the dselect utility tell me that I should have groff. But groff need libg++272. The problem is that I have installed libg++272( the dselect show installed) , but the groff item still shows that libg++272 does not appear in the installed packages list,

Re: patch for man command

1998-01-11 Thread fpolacco
On 10 Jan, Maurizio Marini wrote: > Hi, > i've installed debian 1.3 by > cd availeble on various zines. It's a problem entered because of the "last minute" upgrade before burning the PLUTO CD (which has been copied by some magazines). That version of man-db has been modifyed to work with the new p

Re: patch for man command

1998-01-11 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
The syntax you are using for setting your PAGER looks a little odd. Does it work if you try it like this? # PAGER=less # export PAGER // Heikki -- Heikki Vatiainen * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tampere University of Technology * Tampere, Finland -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LI

patch for man command

1998-01-10 Thread Maurizio Marini
Hi, i've installed debian 1.3 by cd availeble on various zines. someone knows how to patch the command man? if hi enter : #set PAGER less; export PAGER i get this error: sh: exec: pager: not found man: command exited with status 32512: /bin/gzip -dc '/var/catman/cat1/ftp.1.gz&#