Re: Makefile parametrisation

2006-05-11 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-05-09 09:26:38, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Now if only I could get aptitude to understand that I really only need > one copy of /usr/share ... I think, this will not work... And yes, /usr/share can be shared between MACHINES, BUT there WILL be problems between RELEASES... Greetings

Re: Makefile parametrisation

2006-05-09 Thread hendrik
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:26:52PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2006-05-04 08:25:48, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > Thanks. That worked. Why do I need it? Because I have just one home > > directory, NFS-mounted and shared between two machines with different > > architectures. I find

Re: Makefile parametrisation

2006-05-09 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-05-04 08:25:48, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Thanks. That worked. Why do I need it? Because I have just one home > directory, NFS-mounted and shared between two machines with different > architectures. I find it convenient for everything except compiling. I do this too... exactly,

Re: Makefile parametrisation

2006-05-04 Thread hendrik
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:56:27PM +0200, Dennis Stosberg wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I'd like to define a symbol ARCH in my Makefile to be the output > > of > > uname -m > > > > The obvious thing, just starting with > > > > ARCH = `uname -m` > > > > didn't seem to work. It defi

Re: Makefile parametrisation

2006-04-25 Thread Almut Behrens
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:56:27PM +0200, Dennis Stosberg wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I'd like to define a symbol ARCH in my Makefile to be the output > > of > > uname -m > > > > The obvious thing, just starting with > > > > ARCH = `uname -m` > > > > didn't seem to work. It defi

Re: Makefile parametrisation

2006-04-25 Thread Dennis Stosberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd like to define a symbol ARCH in my Makefile to be the output of > uname -m > > The obvious thing, just starting with > > ARCH = `uname -m` > > didn't seem to work. It defined ARCH to be `uname -m' instead of > i686 or x86_64. Not unreasonable, but What *is

Re: Makefile parametrisation

2006-04-25 Thread Dennis Stosberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd like to define a symbol ARCH in my Makefile to be the output > of > uname -m > > The obvious thing, just starting with > > ARCH = `uname -m` > > didn't seem to work. It defined ARCH to be `uname -m' instead of > i686 or x86_64. Not unreasonable, but What *is*

Re: Makefile parametrisation

2006-04-25 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:25:23AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd like to define a symbol ARCH in my Makefile to be the output of > uname -m > > The obvious thing, just starting with > > ARCH = `uname -m` > > didn't seem to work. It defined ARCH to be `uname -m' instead of > i686 o

Makefile parametrisation

2006-04-25 Thread hendrik
I'd like to define a symbol ARCH in my Makefile to be the output of uname -m The obvious thing, just starting with ARCH = `uname -m` didn't seem to work. It defined ARCH to be `uname -m' instead of i686 or x86_64. Not unreasonable, but What *is* the way to do this? -- hendrik -- To