Re: Mailing-list conventions

2009-03-04 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Teemu Likonen wrote: > For your information, there are _lots_ of mailing lists where "reply to > all" is the norm. So being on a mailing list is not the reason per se. > Yeah, I know there are such lists. I personally find that recommendation plain stupid. If people are going to use 'reply to a

Re: Mailing-list conventions

2009-03-04 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
Teemu Likonen wrote: > On 2009-03-04 13:31 (+0100), Thierry Chatelet wrote: > >> PS: Don't CC people unless they say it specificaly, as we are on the >> mailing list. > > For your information, there are _lots_ of mailing lists where "reply to > all" is the norm. So being on a mailing list is not

Re: Mailing-list conventions

2009-03-04 Thread Teemu Likonen
On 2009-03-04 14:13 (UTC), David Jardine wrote: > If I remember correctly, the phrase was "we are on the mailing > list...", which is quite a different thing. Please don't twist > people's words. If I in fact remember incorrectly, I take that all > back :) OK, good point. Such things get easily l

Re: Mailing-list conventions

2009-03-04 Thread David Jardine
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 03:37:08PM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote: > On 2009-03-04 13:21 (UTC), Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > Not on Debian mailing lists: > > http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct > > On 2009-03-04 08:22 (-0500), Michael Marsh wrote: > > > If you go to lists.debian.org and

Re: Mailing-list conventions

2009-03-04 Thread Teemu Likonen
On 2009-03-04 13:21 (UTC), Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Not on Debian mailing lists: > http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct On 2009-03-04 08:22 (-0500), Michael Marsh wrote: > If you go to lists.debian.org and click on the first link > (introduction to Debian mailing lists), there's a Cod

Re: Mailing-list conventions (was: what's the difference and superior between gtk+ and gecko?)

2009-03-04 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On 4 March 2009 14:22:17 Michael Marsh wrote: >> # If you want to complain to someone who sent you a carbon copy when > you did not ask for it, do it privately. > -- > Michael A. Marsh Thank you Michael, I had not noticed that. I will obei this rule from now on. Thierry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Mailing-list conventions (was: what's the difference and superior between gtk+ and gecko?)

2009-03-04 Thread Michael Marsh
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Teemu Likonen wrote: > On 2009-03-04 13:31 (+0100), Thierry Chatelet wrote: >> PS: Don't CC people unless they say it specificaly, as we are on the >> mailing list. > > For your information, there are _lots_ of mailing lists where "reply to > all" is the norm. So be

Re: Mailing-list conventions (was: what's the difference and superior between gtk+ and gecko?)

2009-03-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote: > On 2009-03-04 13:31 (+0100), Thierry Chatelet wrote: > > > PS: Don't CC people unless they say it specificaly, as we are on the > > mailing list. > > For your information, there are _lots_ of mailing lists where "reply to > all" is

Re: Mailing-list conventions (was: what's the difference and superior between gtk+ and gecko?)

2009-03-04 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On 4 March 2009 13:56:34 Teemu Likonen wrote: Friday comes early this week! Thierry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Mailing-list conventions (was: what's the difference and superior between gtk+ and gecko?)

2009-03-04 Thread Teemu Likonen
On 2009-03-04 13:31 (+0100), Thierry Chatelet wrote: > PS: Don't CC people unless they say it specificaly, as we are on the > mailing list. For your information, there are _lots_ of mailing lists where "reply to all" is the norm. So being on a mailing list is not the reason per se. And who know w