Re: Maildir use with Mutt

2002-05-25 Thread dman
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:05:21PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote: | begin dman quotation: ^ I like your tactics here. If a critical mass of people with something useful to say agree to tickle some of Outhouse's bugs, then maybe the outhouse will begin to die :-). | > In an mbox, messages mu

Re: Maildir use with Mutt

2002-05-25 Thread dman
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 09:29:32AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: | also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.05.24.2359 +0200]: | > They're usable, it's just an mbox folder instead of maildir. Mutt can | > read it just as well. | | no. it's single messages delivered to the directory MH style | i

Re: Maildir use with Mutt

2002-05-25 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.05.24.2359 +0200]: > They're usable, it's just an mbox folder instead of maildir. Mutt can > read it just as well. no. it's single messages delivered to the directory MH style i believe. fact is, they are one-message-per-file and so you need my for loop,

Re: Maildir use with Mutt

2002-05-24 Thread Bob Proulx
> > In an mbox, messages must have a > > Lines: header (often added by the delivery agent) so that a reader > > knows how many lines the message is. > > Not "must have", but it makes mbox processing more efficient. If the > Lines header is not there, the reader just reads on until it finds a > bla

Re: Maildir use with Mutt

2002-05-24 Thread Craig Dickson
begin dman quotation: > In an mbox, messages must have a > Lines: header (often added by the delivery agent) so that a reader > knows how many lines the message is. Not "must have", but it makes mbox processing more efficient. If the Lines header is not there, the reader just reads on until it

Re: Maildir use with Mutt

2002-05-24 Thread dman
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 01:29:17PM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote: | Hi all. | | I'm a procmail and mutt user. I'm converting to maildir format instead | of mbox and noticed most of my messages show 0 size now. Is there a | procmail recipe to add this information back into it so it's usuable by | mut

Re: Maildir use with Mutt

2002-05-24 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.05.24.2229 +0200]: > I'm a procmail and mutt user. I'm converting to maildir format instead > of mbox and noticed most of my messages show 0 size now. Is there a > procmail recipe to add this information back into it so it's usuable by > mutt?

Maildir use with Mutt

2002-05-24 Thread Grant Bowman
Hi all. I'm a procmail and mutt user. I'm converting to maildir format instead of mbox and noticed most of my messages show 0 size now. Is there a procmail recipe to add this information back into it so it's usuable by mutt? Second question: when I use Procmail and forget the / on the end of th