On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:10:10AM +0530, Abdullah wrote:
> I want to setup a mailserver on a debian machine. please help me as i have
> not got a perfect answer by googling.
> I wuld like to use squirrelmail. please help.
First set up a nameserver, see
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-txt/DNS-HOWTO.gz. In
I want to setup a mailserver on a debian machine. please help me as i have
not got a perfect answer by googling.
I wuld like to use squirrelmail. please help.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> > I like Postfix and Dovecot
Postfix + Cyrus + SASL for simple users. You can add spamassassin +
pyzor/rzor & config your SASL to use LDAP or other auth method. For me
postfix + cyrus is just a better combi.
On Wednesday, 27 October, 2010 04:13 PM, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 26/10/10 13:20, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct
On 26/10/10 13:20, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
I like Postfix and Dovecot :-)
I think Postfix is the best open source MTA available on Linux hands
down. I have used Sendmail, Qmail, and Exim and none of them have
given me the flexability and security
On 26/10/10 12:10, B. Alexander wrote:
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have always
run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box I am
running on (2.4 GHz P4, 1GB
On 2010-10-26 16:42, Camaleón wrote:
> Users like many things (i.e., Hotmail/Livemail :-P) but and admin has
> also to care about another things (server requirements, performance,
> stability and security).
It's stable, since years and with many concurrent users. And the
support efforts for expl
On 26/10/10 13:21, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, B. Alexander wrote:
I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface.
It's dated in appearance and the lack of a back end database is what
killed it for me.
You can connect squirrellmail to sql. You s
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:14:11 +0200, Andreas Weber wrote:
> On 2010-10-26 14:13, Camaleón wrote:
>>> * spamassassin (in case I ever decide to work around the port 25
>>> block)
>
> spampd is your friend.
AFAIK, "spamd" comes within SA.
>>> * roundcube for webmail
>> As an alternative to Roundcu
On 2010-10-26 14:13, Camaleón wrote:
>> * spamassassin (in case I ever decide to work around the port 25 block)
spampd is your friend.
>> * roundcube for webmail
> As an alternative to Roundcube (I avoid webmail as much as I can) I would
> take a look into Squirrel.
RoundCube is simply great. A
I think that any modern, inexpensive system (dual- or quad-core AMD
CPUs running around 3GHz, 4GB RAM) would fit the bill.
OP didnt say how many users would be using it, but it doesn't sound like
many considering his existing box. Postfix with things like clamav,
spamassiain, webmail, mysql
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:18:41 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> I like Postfix and Dovecot :-)
>>
>> Spamassassin is resource (ram/cpu) consuming and provided that you are
>> not going online (no spam) it could be omitted.
>>
>> As an alternative to
On Ter, 26 Out 2010, "B. Alexander" wrote:
* roundcube for webmail
You could try IMP, part of the Horde suite for e-mail. It's only
slightly less ugly than SquirrelMail, but it is extremely powerful
feature-wise.
--
Use at own risk.
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br
--
To
essage-
From: "B. Alexander"
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33
To: Debian-user List
Subject: Mail server recommendations
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have a
I don't mind keeping my mail in a flat file rather than a db. I guess if I
were doing higher volume stuff, it might make a difference, but most of the
emails I deal with are read, deal with and delete.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camal
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, B. Alexander wrote:
> I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface.
It's dated in appearance and the lack of a back end database is what
killed it for me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> I like Postfix and Dovecot :-)
I think Postfix is the best open source MTA available on Linux hands
down. I have used Sendmail, Qmail, and Exim and none of them have
given me the flexability and security of Postfix. Not to mention it's
the easies
I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> > Now the mail server, since Comcast blocked port 25, is mainly used for
> > internal monitor/security messa
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
(...)
> Now the mail server, since Comcast blocked port 25, is mainly used for
> internal monitor/security messages, like ossec and opsview, apticron
> messages, etc. So I was looking to set up an OpenVZ container, probably
> sid, as a mails
On 10/26/2010 06:10 AM, B. Alexander wrote:
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have
always run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box
I am running on (2.4 GHz P4,
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have always
run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box I am
running on (2.4 GHz P4, 1GB RAM) is being beaten to death by java in
20 matches
Mail list logo
