On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 02:06:20PM -0400, D-Man wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:31:54AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> | * Mark Wagnon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010709 15:31]:
> | > Do you mean "with" or "without"? I'm a little confused. Mutt has some
> | > option to change the from header for outboun
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:31:54AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
| * Mark Wagnon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010709 15:31]:
| > Do you mean "with" or "without"? I'm a little confused. Mutt has some
| > option to change the from header for outbound mail. I don't use it, so
|
| (judicious use of hedgeclippers
* Mark Wagnon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010709 15:31]:
> Do you mean "with" or "without"? I'm a little confused. Mutt has some
> option to change the from header for outbound mail. I don't use it, so
(judicious use of hedgeclippers above)
In order to set the from address that mutt wil use, try setting
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 03:33:59PM -0500, Brendan O'Connor wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 July 2001 12:56, will trillich wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:50:51PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> > > On 07/09/01 02:31:03 -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> > > > I'm yet another person who'd love to completely tr
On Tuesday 10 July 2001 12:56, will trillich wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:50:51PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> > On 07/09/01 02:31:03 -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> > > I'm yet another person who'd love to completely transition from Windows
> > > to Linux. And yes, I use Outlook and yes, gett
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:50:51PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> On 07/09/01 02:31:03 -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> > I'm yet another person who'd love to completely transition from Windows
> > to Linux. And yes, I use Outlook and yes, getting mail really working on
> > Linux is the biggest obstacle
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:53:07PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> I tried that when I was first configuring exim, but it didn't work for
> me. I ended up just letting exim consider itself an "internet site",
> i.e. if mail is going from me to foo.com, exim goes straight to
> foo.com's mail server to
On 07/09/01 02:31:03 -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> Hi! This is a little long-winded, so bail now if you're not interested
> in newbie mail setup woes...
I hope you can make some sense out of my reply. It's a little "all
over the place". The bulk of my reply is at the bottom...
>
> I'm yet anoth
Eric G. Miller wrote:
> When you configure exim, you'll want it as a "smarthost" forwarding
> everthing that isn't destined for a local user ("paul") to @Homes smtp
> server.
I tried that when I was first configuring exim, but it didn't work for
me. I ended up just letting exim consider itself an
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 02:31:03AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> Task 1. While logged in to my debian system as 'paul', get my @Home mail
> and send all outgoing mail through @Home's smtp server with
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' as the return address. As I understand it, I
> should be able to do this wit
Hi! This is a little long-winded, so bail now if you're not interested
in newbie mail setup woes...
I'm yet another person who'd love to completely transition from Windows
to Linux. And yes, I use Outlook and yes, getting mail really working on
Linux is the biggest obstacle to my completing the tr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Wednesday 04 July 2001 10:30, Lambrecht Joris wrote:
>> Anyone looking to buy a scanner
>
>Really, read about 'sane'. Google search it and you will get some good info.
>
I know about sane, i know about Cano
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 01:42:01PM -0400, Jeld The Dark Elf wrote:
>
> I love mutt. Well, I suppose it is not for everybody. Out of text clients I
> would
> suggest PINE, since it is very user friendly on one side and still text on
> the other.
> Out of X based things a few to try would be Nets
On Wednesday 04 July 2001 10:30, Lambrecht Joris wrote:
> Anyone looking to buy a scanner
Really, read about 'sane'. Google search it and you will get some good info.
>
> After a lot-of-trial and error i managed to get fetchmail working
> correctly. Apparently the example config files aren't all
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 04:55:24PM +, Lambrecht Joris wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In a fit of rage (they just shouldn't have said those things out loud) i
> moved from win2k to linux for 'almost' everything i do on my computer.
> Scanning (canon d660u) is still a problem because Canon refuses to sh
On 07/04/01 10:00:37 +0200, Martin F. Krafft wrote:
> are you kidding me? OE can *import* everything, but export only to
> Outlook. Now why would micro$oft provide a feature that would
> facilitate switching away from their product???
Yeah, I forgot about the black hole located at Redmond, WA, USA
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 03:31:40AM +, Lambrecht Joris wrote:
| Hi All,
|
| In a fit of rage (they just shouldn't have said those things out
| loud) i moved from win2k to linux for 'almost' everything i do on my
Woohoo! You're lucky :-). (I have to use win2k at work, but with
cygwin and my s
On Wed 04 Jul 2001 05:30:37 MET
"Lambrecht Joris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leaves me very little choice. The only two i haven't tested yet are Evolution
> (http://www.ximian.com/evolution) and Postoffice (www.tarball.net) wich looks
> pretty cool but didn't work right away. Again, any and al
also sprach Mark Wagnon (on Tue, 03 Jul 2001 09:08:55PM -0700):
> > Also, i want to import my OE mail and adress book into my Linux
> > system, any good hints on what software/procedure to use ?
>
> Doesn't OE have some kind of export feature for this stuff? I never
> warmed up to OE very much. On
also sprach Lambrecht Joris (on Wed, 04 Jul 2001 03:35:11AM +):
> In a fit of rage (they just shouldn't have said those things out
> loud) i moved from win2k to linux for 'almost' everything i do on my
> computer.
congratulations. it's really the way to go, and just you wait, in a
week or two,
Lambrecht Joris wrote:
> After a lot-of-trial and error i managed to get fetchmail working
> correctly. Apparently the example config files aren't all that great
> :( At least not for me.
The 'fetchmailconf' utility does wonders. I let it do the first pass, and
then I edit .fetchmailrc by hand.
On 07/04/01 03:29:53 +, Lambrecht Joris wrote:
> Any hints on what i might be overlooking ? I don't want to get stuck
> with some mailclient eating up my mail without a chance to export it
> later on . . . hence i chose the fetchmail/sendmail combo.
I dunno. I tried to configure sendmail once
Hi All,
In a fit of rage (they just shouldn't have said those things out loud) i moved
from win2k to linux for 'almost' everything i do on my computer. Scanning
(canon d660u) is still a problem because Canon refuses to share information
with Linux developers. Anyone looking to buy a scanner ?-P
23 matches
Mail list logo
