Re: mutt, sent mail, pgp/gpg

2003-08-20 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Richard Hector <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030820 01:59]: > Is there a way that my copy can be encypted with my own public key, so I > can read it myself? Add "encrypt-to " to your .gnupg/options. Yours sincerely Alexander pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: mutt, sent mail, pgp/gpg

2003-08-19 Thread Johann Koenig
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:22:09 -0400 Johann Koenig wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:07:38 +1200 > Richard Hector wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:01:12PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote: > > > Nope, sorry. Doesn't look like it worked. Sorry to bother you. > > > > Thanks anyway (yes, I'm the right

mutt, sent mail, pgp/gpg

2003-08-19 Thread Richard Hector
I know I've seen something about this, but can't find it again. When I send an encrypted email, the copy that is saved in my Sent folder (IMAP in my case) is useless to me, because it's encrypted with the recipient's key. Is there a way that my copy can be encypted with my own public key, so I ca

Re: Mail & PGP, Specially gpg and xfmail

2000-02-10 Thread Neilen Marais
> there are some other gui mail readers that i hear are quite good but > i've > never used enough to have any real opinion on. check out tkrat, > postillion, > xfmail (now becomming archimedes) all of which support imap and > pgp/gpg to > varying degrees. Has anyone actually managed to get gpg a

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-10 Thread Adam Shand
> Hmm. I've never had any problems with it, but YMMV. (Not SMTP, by the > way, but RFC 822.) yeah you're right. > See, that drives me up the wall. I don't like the fact that it all goes > through another editor (and one so badly written that it needs to insert > a spurious blank line at the end

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-10 Thread Colin Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Shand) wrote: > * because you can't (nicely) edit the headers while you are editing the > message you are forced to do it at the "pre-send" screen. this is okay > (though a little strange for a user used to pine/modern gui > mailers) however if you have a long To: or

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-10 Thread Adam Shand
> Hmmm, I don't think that's true, AFAIK you can configure mutt to edit > the header in the message body however you want. See its man files. as it says just below where you cut off the quote: editing that field and then scrolling through it. when you set 'set edit_headers' on you can edi

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-09 Thread dan
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:09:23PM -0900, Adam Shand wrote: > * because you can't (nicely) edit the headers while you are editing the >message you are forced to do it at the "pre-send" screen. this is okay >(though a little strange for a user used to pine/modern gui >mailers) however

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-09 Thread Adam Shand
> ("Personally" noted, but for the benefit of other readers:) i knew i was gonna catch it for that :-) > I actually find that, for a committed vim user like me, and indeed first thing, i use vim for admin work (:%s/whatever/something/g rocks ...), but for for typing email i finding annoying. w

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-09 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 10:12:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 03:36:37PM -0900, Adam Shand wrote: > > mutt's pgp/gpg integration is second to none (it's *really* nice) but it > > only uses pgp/mime which a lot of clients don't support yet > > (pine/netscape). i also

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-09 Thread dan
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 03:36:37PM -0900, Adam Shand wrote: > mutt's pgp/gpg integration is second to none (it's *really* nice) but it > only uses pgp/mime which a lot of clients don't support yet > (pine/netscape). i also personally hate it's lack of editor > integration. if it wasn't for that i

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-09 Thread Colin Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Shand) wrote: >mutt's pgp/gpg integration is second to none (it's *really* nice) but it >only uses pgp/mime which a lot of clients don't support yet >(pine/netscape). i also personally hate it's lack of editor >integration. if it wasn't for that i'd be using mutt now (in f

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-09 Thread Adam Shand
> does anyone know which mail programm can access imap postoffices and > also encrypt mail with pgp? pine has the best imap support, and can support pgp/gpg though filters (check out pgp4pine on freshmeat), this is what i use. mutt's pgp/gpg integration is second to none (it's *really* nice) but

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-09 Thread dan
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 08:08:51PM +, Sven Gaerner wrote: > Hi, > > does anyone know which mail programm can access imap postoffices and also > encrypt mail with pgp? > > Thanks. > > Sven > > -- > ++ > | Please repl

Re: Mail & PGP

2000-02-08 Thread Martin Schulze
Sven Gaerner wrote: > Hi, > > does anyone know which mail programm can access imap postoffices and also > encrypt mail with pgp? I've been told that Mutt speaks some dialect of IMAP. Mutt is famous for being able to sign & encrypt mails with gpg and pgp2/pgp5. Regards, Joey -- The go

Mail & PGP

2000-02-08 Thread Sven Gaerner
Hi, does anyone know which mail programm can access imap postoffices and also encrypt mail with pgp? Thanks. Sven -- ++ | Please reply only to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Other email addre