Re: [off list] Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-24 Thread Brian
On Tue 22 Nov 2016 at 17:51:56 +, Brian wrote: > On Tue 22 Nov 2016 at 08:38:55 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > On 11/21/2016 11:15 AM, David Wright wrote: > > >Disclaimer: I have no idea what the subject of this thread is about. > > > > > > If I was going on only on the responses to my

Re: [off list] Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-22 Thread Brian
On Tue 22 Nov 2016 at 08:38:55 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 11/21/2016 11:15 AM, David Wright wrote: > >Disclaimer: I have no idea what the subject of this thread is about. > > > If I was going on only on the responses to my post starting this sub-thread > I would wonder myself ;/ Forgetti

[off list] Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-22 Thread Richard Owlett
On 11/21/2016 11:15 AM, David Wright wrote: Disclaimer: I have no idea what the subject of this thread is about. If I was going on only on the responses to my post starting this sub-thread I would wonder myself ;/ [snip] Well, I know what my expectations are: to see an idiosyncratic probl

Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-21 Thread David Wright
Disclaimer: I have no idea what the subject of this thread is about. On Mon 21 Nov 2016 at 15:11:21 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 08:34:42AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:26:45PM +, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > > Well, when the OP wr

Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-21 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, November 21, 2016 11:25:13 AM Brian wrote: > On Mon 21 Nov 2016 at 10:37:33 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > On my Jessie system, neither pmount nor udisks is installed, but udisks2 > > apparently is, and I suspect it is what provides that functionality on > > Jessie. There does not

Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-21 Thread Brian
On Mon 21 Nov 2016 at 10:37:33 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On my Jessie system, neither pmount nor udisks is installed, but udisks2 > apparently is, and I suspect it is what provides that functionality on > Jessie. > There does not seem to be a =udisks2 --dump= function. udisksctl dump

Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-21 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, November 21, 2016 09:11:21 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 08:34:42AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:26:45PM +, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > 1) He wants auto-mounting of the inserted media, in the manner of > > Microsoft > > > >

Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-21 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 08:34:42AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:26:45PM +, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > Well, when the OP writes "sane" he does not mean sane the program, but > > rather that he wants reasonable or r

Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-21 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:26:45PM +, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > Well, when the OP writes "sane" he does not mean sane the program, but > rather that he wants reasonable or rational file permissions (see > https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sane#Adjective ). I think, unfortunately, he actua

Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-21 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On Seg, 21 Nov 2016, Lisi Reisz wrote: The most frustrating thing about this whole thread, which I had been saving because I have a SANE problem (more later), and SANE problems are often to do with permissions, is that it has nothing *whatsoever* to do with SANE. :-( It is about file permissions

Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-21 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 20 November 2016 20:54:17 Brian wrote: [snip whole thread which doesn't match subject line] The most frustrating thing about this whole thread, which I had been saving because I have a SANE problem (more later), and SANE problems are often to do with permissions, is that it has nothing

Re: MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-20 Thread Brian
On Sun 20 Nov 2016 at 14:25:16 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 11/19/2016 12:51 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: > >I use fat16 and fat32 formatted USB flash drives for _EXACTLY_ > >*ONE* purpose. > >It is to transfer data to/from a Windows machine. > >There is NO [nor will there ever be] a network con

MURPHY'S LAW RULES - was [Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific]

2016-11-20 Thread Richard Owlett
On 11/19/2016 12:51 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: I use fat16 and fat32 formatted USB flash drives for _EXACTLY_ *ONE* purpose. It is to transfer data to/from a Windows machine. There is NO [nor will there ever be] a network connection between them. When I plug one into my Debian machine I want tota