Friday, May 19, 2000, 9:04:17 AM, A. wrote:
> Thanks to all for the MUA advice. I can see that I'm going to have to learn
> some new things (again), like MTAs. Linux has an amazing ability to laugh at
> your years as a computer professional make you feel like an idiot.
Actually I'd not do that
Thanks to all for the MUA advice. I can see that I'm going to have to learn
some new things (again), like MTAs. Linux has an amazing ability to laugh at
your years as a computer professional make you feel like an idiot.
But that's what's so [EMAIL PROTECTED] great about it.
==
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ethan Benson) writes:
[...]
>
> the only MUA for *nix that includes an MTA is bloatscape
> communicator.
Or you can look at xfmail. I've used it a long time (but now I'm using
gnus), and it's easy to setup. Inlucdes code for POP3 and IMAP, can
talk SMTP.
Burkhard
Actually it's not hard in netscape to perform filtering.
If whateverbitofmsg (eg to, sender etc) contains blah then move to
folder (or whatever action you want.)
Word wrap is in Edit/Preferences/Mail and Newsgroups/Messages/Message
Wrapping
Peter.
Mike Werner wrote:
> ... this is not true. Net
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 08:04:26PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> I didn't like Netscrape for mail -
Nor do I, however ...
> it word wraps in the wrong places
> and to put mail in separate folders you've either got to monkey
> around with `procmail' or endlessly drag and drop from Inbox to
> "Ethan" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ethan> the only MUA for *nix that includes an MTA is bloatscape
Ethan> communicator.
It's better to install a MTA, like `exim', `postfix', or `sendmail'.
You can set it up so it doesn't accept connections from the net if
you li
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 11:28:15AM -0500, A. Scott White wrote:
> Ethan Benson wrote:
> > that is because outlook is broken and does not understand
> > RFC2015.
>
> What Linux MUA should I use. I'd like one that has a complete feature set
> and doesn't rely on X (I don't like X).
if you don't lik
7 matches
Mail list logo