Quoting Mike Barton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >Nobody answered your post probably because they couldn't guess from
> >"not having any luck" why you couldn't just compile the module along
> >with whatever kernel version you're using.
>
> I included shell output from both an attempt to load the module
-Original Message-
From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 16, 1999 9:06 AM
To: Mike Barton; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: David Wright
Subject: Re: MICROSOFT BS FUD
Quoting Mike Barton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I suppose you "just forgot" to post
Quoting Mike Barton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I suppose you "just forgot" to post an even minor semblance of proof? Please
> correct the error and let us all in on it. Better yet why not answer my
> "iBCS anyone" post of a few days ago.
Seeing as the modules in -2.0.34 and -2.0.35 compare equal, and
Apparently Mindcraft and MS(we don't really know this) has pulled this
act before.
Take a look at the response Netware has when MC did a comparison with
netware.
http://www.novell.com/advantage/nw5/nw5-mindcraftcheck.html
Philip Thiem
--
PENQUIN-LOVER-CODER ALERT: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All win
April 14, 1999 3:21 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: MICROSOFT BS FUD
Well it finally happened. Microsoft has paid someone off to fix a
benchmark showing that Windows NT is actually better than linux.
http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html
===
Amateur Radio, when a
On 1999-04-14 18:14, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:
> Of course, its not likely that anyone in the free software movement will
> be able to verify the results, because they used pretty expensive
> machinery. A four processor Xeon as the server, and 144 pentium test
> nodes with ethernet switches.
On 14 Apr 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
> | Well, while I agree with that, this is already being read and believed by
> | managers and suits. What we need are numbers to the contrary, not "it was
> | commisioned by Microsoft".
>
> Again, any logical person would conclude that the test was biased
"Christopher J. Morrone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 14 Apr 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
[snip]
| > You guys need to read your Slashdot (http://slashdot.org). I've heard
| > that this particular "benchmark" was commissioned by Microsoft. Anyone
| > who pays attention to a benchmark commission
On 14 Apr 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
> Kenneth Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | There already has been feedback on the web (and this list) about this.
> | It does appear that a great effort was made to pull all the stops out
> | in configuring NT, and little care was given to setting up
Kenneth Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| There already has been feedback on the web (and this list) about this.
| It does appear that a great effort was made to pull all the stops out
| in configuring NT, and little care was given to setting up Linux. IE:
| use of a kerenl with know network b
There already has been feedback on the web (and this list) about this.
It does appear that a great effort was made to pull all the stops out
in configuring NT, and little care was given to setting up Linux. IE:
use of a kerenl with know network bugs, none of apache's optimizations
turned on...
-
Rick Macdonald wrote:
>
> > Well it finally happened. Microsoft has paid someone off to fix a
> > benchmark showing that Windows NT is actually better than linux.
> >
> > http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html
>
> This doesn't look good. Are the results cooked or flawed, or the
>
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> Well it finally happened. Microsoft has paid someone off to fix a
> benchmark showing that Windows NT is actually better than linux.
>
> http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html
This doesn't look good. Are the results cooked or flawed, o
Well it finally happened. Microsoft has paid someone off to fix a
benchmark showing that Windows NT is actually better than linux.
http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html
===
Amateur Radio, when all else fails!
http://www.qsl.net/wa2mze
Debian Gnu Linux, Live Free or .
_
14 matches
Mail list logo
