On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Jon Dowland wrote:
>
> Are you using GNU emacs? Then how about Xemacs (formely Lucid emacs)?
Actually, i guess somebody should bring up SXemacs.
This variant has lots of goodies in it (e.g., quaternion support and lots of
other stuff you wouldn't expect in an ed
Are you using GNU emacs? Then how about Xemacs (formely Lucid emacs)?
or vice-versa.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120925191858.GA26155@debian
Hi,
Subject: My app-defaults won't work for emacs any more
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 01:25:20 + (UTC)
I haven't updated my emacs for quite a while and today when I update it,
I notice that the new emacs is not following my app-defaults settings,
which has been working for quite a long time.
lee wrote:
...
... You can still run emacs fine on the
console or in a terminal as you could 15--20 years ago, and you can use
the GUI frames if you like, even all at the same time --- or compile a
version that doesn't have X-support at all.
FYI: There's an "emacs23-nox" (no X11 dependency) pac
> (if (>= emacs-major-version 20)
> (menu-bar-mode -1))
I recommend testing (fboundp 'menu-bar-mode) instead.
> (if (>= emacs-major-version 21)
> (if window-system
> (tool-bar-mode -1)))
And here I recommend testing (fboundp 'tool-bar-mode) and calling the
function regardless of
Vincent Chen wrote:
> Since you've been using Emacs for the past 15 years, I hope you do
> realize you can disable all the GUI clutter by setting:
>
> (menu-bar-mode -1)
> (tool-bar-mode -1)
> (scroll-bar-mode -1)
>
> in your ~/.emacs (though I do keep the scroll bar around, easier to
> read than
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:25:53 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:01:33 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
>>
>> And you want to drop it just because of a problem with your settings
>> not being honored? Have you report it?
>
> Does
many little details
>>>> one doesn't think about anymore and then misses in others ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Funny thing, that does not have my favorite editor: mc.
>>
>> +1 for mcedit but I guess is far away from being a proper emacs
>
I feel your pain. Have you ever tried: emacs -nw filename gtk is
plenty freaky enough even in a g.u.i. environment, having it invade
command line space through whichever proxy software is unreasonable. Two
possibilities beyond emacs might be jove and mg. On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, T o n
g wrote:
> O
T o n g writes:
> there is only one looks and feel, the Unix one. Over the years, emacs is
> moving towards Windows, I lost its xterm-like scroll bar years ago, now
> the whole Unix-like look and feel is gone. It's OK to woo the windows
> users, but to completely ignore the Unix users, that's
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 1:25 PM, T o n g wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:01:33 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
>>
>> And you want to drop it just because of a problem with your settings not
>> being honored? Have you report it?
>
> Does it mat
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:01:33 +, Camaleón wrote:
Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
>
> And you want to drop it just because of a problem with your settings not
> being honored? Have you report it?
Does it matter? -- I started to use Emacs almost 15 years ago. By th
Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:21:30 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
lee wrote:
T o n g writes:
Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
And you want to drop it just because of a problem with your settings not
being honored? Have you report it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w
Am Samstag, 8. September 2012 schrieb T o n g:
> Hi,
>
> > Subject: My app-defaults won't work for emacs any more
> > Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 01:25:20 + (UTC)
> >
> > I haven't updated my emacs for quite a while and today when I update
> > it, I notice that the new emacs is not following my app
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:21:30 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
> lee wrote:
>> T o n g writes:
>>
>>> Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
And you want to drop it just because of a problem with your settings not
being honored? Have you report it?
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compa
lee wrote:
T o n g writes:
Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_text_editors
You might as well use emacs more, there are so many little details one
doesn't think about anymore and then misses in others ...
Funny thing, that d
T o n g writes:
> Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_text_editors
You might as well use emacs more, there are so many little details one
doesn't think about anymore and then misses in others ...
--
Debian testing amd64
--
To
Hi,
> Subject: My app-defaults won't work for emacs any more
> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 01:25:20 + (UTC)
>
> I haven't updated my emacs for quite a while and today when I update it,
> I notice that the new emacs is not following my app-defaults settings,
> which has been working for quite a lon
18 matches
Mail list logo
