On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:09:36 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/06/2010 03:13 PM, hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:08:55PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I wrote a page with a footer containi
On 06/06/2010 03:13 PM, hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:08:55PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I wrote a page with a footer containing a page number. I had no trouble
saving it as an .odt file, but OpenOf
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:08:55PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > I wrote a page with a footer containing a page number. I had no trouble
> > saving it as an .odt file, but OpenOffice 3.0 crashed when I tried to
>
> Real
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:08:55PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I wrote a page with a footer containing a page number. I had no trouble
> saving it as an .odt file, but OpenOffice 3.0 crashed when I tried to
Really 3.0? Umm. what? We're at 3.2 now since months.
(And note vanilla OOo versi
On 06/04/2010 02:08 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[snip]
I wrote a page with a footer containing a page number. I had no trouble
saving it as an .odt file, but OpenOffice 3.0 crashed when I tried to
save it as .fodt. So it looks as if .fodt support in OpenOffice is
totally fried.
Not only that, but
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 20:11:36 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> At this point mv .openoffice.org hide.openoffice.org doesn't help
> either.
>
> After I moved the dotfile, I tried to start openoffice writer again. It
> created a new .openoffice.org directory, but it still won't come up and
> give me a
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:08:55 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:04:02 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:37:45 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:49:35 +, Camaleón wrote:
Also, if you open the file with a web browser (epiphany,
>
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:04:02 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:37:45 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:49:35 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> You can choose any XML validators out there :-)
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv
>>
>> To uise that, I'd fir
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:37:45 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:49:35 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> You can choose any XML validators out there :-)
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv
>
> To uise that, I'd first have to have the XML schema for .fodt.
>
> What's more, that
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:49:35 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:23:58 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
>> I found an .odf validator online at http://opendocumentfellowship.com/
>> validator (upload a file and it tells you if it likes it), but it
>> doesn't handle fodt. It complains it h
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:23:58 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I found an .odf validator online at http://opendocumentfellowship.com/
> validator (upload a file and it tells you if it likes it), but it
> doesn't handle fodt. It complains it hasn't been compressed and
> packaged as a .zip file. Now su
I found an .odf validator online at http://opendocumentfellowship.com/
validator (upload a file and it tells you if it likes it), but it doesn't
handle fodt. It complains it hasn't been compressed and packaged as
a .zip file. Now surely it's *less* work to check .fodt, because you
don'thave to
12 matches
Mail list logo
