Re: Long neglected OS ... updating

2015-12-13 Thread Harry Putnam
Stefan Monnier writes: > [ Speaking as someone who re-installs as rarely as possible, and whose > machines almost all derive (via upgrades like yours) from an install > from around 2006. ] OK, now were talking Thanks again to all posters... really good expert help here. [...] main bul

Re: Long neglected OS ... updating

2015-12-03 Thread Joe
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:36:23 -0500 Harry Putnam wrote: > Resurrecting a neglected OS, need a little coaching about the output > of `aptitude full-upgrade'. > > I want to know if this output is fairly typical or what one might > expect after neglecting an OS a good while... but mostly if going >

Re: Long neglected OS ... updating

2015-12-03 Thread Stefan Monnier
[ Speaking as someone who re-installs as rarely as possible, and whose machines almost all derive (via upgrades like yours) from an install from around 2006. ] > | The following actions will resolve these dependencies: > | > | Remove the following packages: > | 1

Re: Long neglected OS ... updating

2015-12-03 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 00:36 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > Resurrecting a neglected OS, need a little coaching about the output > of `aptitude full-upgrade'. If this is an upgrade from one stable release to another, just read the release notes and follow the recommended procedure. -- Cheers, Sven

Re: Long neglected OS ... updating

2015-12-03 Thread rlharris
On Thu, December 3, 2015 5:15 am, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:36:23AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: >> Resurrecting a neglected OS, need a little coaching about the output of >> `aptitude full-upgrade'. The best approach for long neglect likely is a fresh installation, which can

Re: Long neglected OS ... updating

2015-12-03 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Thursday 03 December 2015 05:36:23 Harry Putnam wrote: > Resurrecting a neglected OS, need a little coaching about the output > of `aptitude full-upgrade'. When updating an even slightly neglected OS, I _never_ go straight to full-upgrade. # aptitude safe-upgrade followed by # aptitude full

Re: Long neglected OS ... updating

2015-12-03 Thread Darac Marjal
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:36:23AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: Resurrecting a neglected OS, need a little coaching about the output of `aptitude full-upgrade'. I want to know if this output is fairly typical or what one might expect after neglecting an OS a good while... but mostly if going ah

Re: Long neglected OS ... updating

2015-12-02 Thread Joe
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:36:23 -0500 Harry Putnam wrote: > Resurrecting a neglected OS, need a little coaching about the output > of `aptitude full-upgrade'. > How 'long-neglected', and, importantly, which version is this? If it is unstable, this may work, but I'd recommend using apt-get rather

Re: Long neglected OS ... updating

2015-12-02 Thread David Christensen
On 12/02/2015 09:36 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: Resurrecting a neglected OS, need a little coaching about the output of `aptitude full-upgrade'. ... Are there red flags in the above output that mean I need to do preliminary work before `full-uptrade' ? My goal is to *use* Debian, so I want stabil

Long neglected OS ... updating

2015-12-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Resurrecting a neglected OS, need a little coaching about the output of `aptitude full-upgrade'. I want to know if this output is fairly typical or what one might expect after neglecting an OS a good while... but mostly if going ahead is likely to land my subpar skilled behind in hot water. I've