On Feb 1, 2012, at 12:10 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> I posted the solution elsewhere in this thread. But since I changed
> the subject it will confuse some mail readers and therefore will add
> an additional follow-up here.
>
> The solution is that the netboot.tar.gz files need to be in sync with
>
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> These problems are due to the mismatch between the new udeb files in
> the 6.0.4 point release and the previous 6.0.3 netboot files on my
> (and your) server. The netboot files needed to be updated. Updating
> them solved my problem. And now
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Chris Hiestand wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:48 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
>>> I've had a stable, working, preseed configuration with no changes
>>> other than downloading the latest stable debian releases (netboot
>>> images). Suddenly partman has stopped working i
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Chris Hiestand wrote:
> > Would you mind running a test install and seeing if things are still
> > working for you? If you have a chance anyway.
> >
> > I've now also reproduced the problem with the 32-bit kernel as well.
>
> And it failed! I confirmed this on both i386 and a
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Chris Hiestand wrote:
> > I've had a stable, working, preseed configuration with no changes
> > other than downloading the latest stable debian releases (netboot
> > images). Suddenly partman has stopped working in my preseed:
> > ...
> >
Chris Hiestand wrote:
> I've had a stable, working, preseed configuration with no changes
> other than downloading the latest stable debian releases (netboot
> images). Suddenly partman has stopped working in my preseed:
> ...
> > !! ERROR: Logical Volume Manager not availab
Chris Hiestand wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Since I am using a Stable netboot I am not updating it until Wheezy.
> > So I can't confirm or deny the problem here.
>
> Would you mind running a test install and seeing if things are still
> working for you? If you have a chance anyway.
>
> I've now
On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:48 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> I've had a stable, working, preseed configuration with no changes
>> other than downloading the latest stable debian releases (netboot
>> images). Suddenly partman has stopped working in my preseed:
>
> If you swap back in the previous netboot i
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Chris Hiestand wrote:
>> I've had a stable, working, preseed configuration with no changes
>> other than downloading the latest stable debian releases (netboot
>> images). Suddenly partman has stopped working in my preseed:
>
> If you swap back
Chris Hiestand wrote:
> I've had a stable, working, preseed configuration with no changes
> other than downloading the latest stable debian releases (netboot
> images). Suddenly partman has stopped working in my preseed:
If you swap back in the previous netboot image does that restore the
working
artition disks
> ---
>
> !! ERROR: Logical Volume Manager not available
>
> The current kernel doesn't support the Logical Volume Manager. You may need
> to load the lvm-mod module.
I'm not even creating an LVM-managed partition, just a basic one:
> d-i partman
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Noah Dain wrote:
> > How does RAID interact with LVM? Do I place RAID on top of LVM or the
> > other way around?
LVM on top of md RAID (there is also device-mapper RAID, now), so lvm has
PVs that are md devices.
> > Or am I worrying unnecessarily: Is it possible to mix them
On 1/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm planning to set up an array of two hard disks as a software RAID in
> and AMD64 box. TO have some flexibility, I'm also planning to use LVM.
> How does RAID interact with LVM? Do I place RAID on top of LVM or the
> other way around?
>
I'm planning to set up an array of two hard disks as a software RAID in
and AMD64 box. TO have some flexibility, I'm also planning to use LVM.
How does RAID interact with LVM? Do I place RAID on top of LVM or the
other way around?
Or am I worrying unnecessarily: Is it possible to mix them arbi
Hi Neal,
On Sunday, August 3, 2003, at 12:50 PM, Neal Lippman wrote:
1) Which lvm package to install? There are two obvious choices, lvm10
and lvm2. While lvm2 is the new rewrite, which is supposedly "stable",
it apparently lacks some features and according to the debian.org
description of the pa
I am looking at installing the lvm layer on my file server, which is
presently running woody. I have two 80GB hd's, one of which presently
stores my /home partition (exported via both nfs and samba to the other
systems on my home lan), and another which I just installed. (Actually,
there's a third
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 10:08:50AM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
[a whole bunch of things about LVM, initrd, etc.]
Thanks to you and Shyamal for the information. As always, I learnt
something new. I guess I need more knowledge on LVM and initrd.
-Andy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
"Alan" == Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alan> The issue that concerns me with LVS is is that it has a
Alan> command to create an initrd image for booting. I suspect
Alan> that it is creating something that loads the lvm modules in
Alan> the kernel, but the documen
"Andy" == Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> I don't know jack about LVM, but from reading other posts
Andy> and docs it seems that having the root partition on a
Andy> filesystem that is loaded as a module is generally a bad
Andy> idea.
It makes perfect sense to
On Saturday 28 September 2002 6:38 am, Andy Saxena wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:20:36PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > I "think" because I have ext3 as a root partition and am using the debian
> > kernel which has that as a module, debian's installation of the kernel
> > has created an ini
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:20:36PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> I "think" because I have ext3 as a root partition and am using the debian
> kernel which has that as a module, debian's installation of the kernel has
> created an initrd image which it loads on boot and uses to load the ext3
> mo
On Thursday 26 September 2002 6:09 pm, Q. Gong wrote:
> I converted my root file system to LVM. A Linux partition (e.g. using ext2
> file system) is needed for /boot, containing the kernel files
> which support LVM. I previously posted a message including all detailed
> steps.
>
I went back and r
I converted my root file system to LVM. A Linux partition (e.g. using ext2
file system) is needed for /boot, containing the kernel files
which support LVM. I previously posted a message including all detailed
steps.
Good luck,
Qian
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 Sept
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 10:19 am, Tom Allison wrote:
> Can you implement LVM on an already installed system?
I did, although I did not replace my root partition, I did with all the
others. The reason I didn't try and replace the root partition was that the
docs says you need to create an
At 2002-09-24T14:28:50Z, Emil Hägerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How do you switch the root partition to lvm?
I left my root partition untouched, so I can't give advice for that final
step.
--
Kirk Strauser
In Googlis non est, ergo non est.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: > Can you implement LVM on an already installed system?
Re: I did.
How do you switch the root partition to lvm?
(I have only "/" left)
And after that, what modifications do I need
to do in /etc/lilo.conf for the boot to be a
success?
Yours
Emil
--
Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org
At 2002-09-24T09:19:29Z, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you implement LVM on an already installed system?
I did.
--
Kirk Strauser
In Googlis non est, ergo non est.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Can you implement LVM on an already installed system?
--
The lawgiver, of all beings, most owes the law allegiance. He of
all men
should behave as though the law compelled him. But it is the universal
weakness of mankind that what we are given to administer we
presently imagine
we own.
28 matches
Mail list logo
