My internet provider blocks e-mails sending to smtp server so sending a letter
via the web.
It is seemed to 813786 resolved bug you can see:
From: Julian Andres Klode
To: 813786-cl...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#813786: fixed in apt 1.4~beta3
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 21:03:45 +
But now problem
Aha...
So I assume that basically boils down to apt-get not being able to
resolve a dependency at a specific version and instead will always
look for and install the candidate version?
I need to stick to apt-get really - just because I dont want to re-do
2 tons of documentation ;o)
I have manage
On Jo, 01 iul 10, 22:06:49, Didster wrote:
>
> How can a package that is "not installable" then be installed??!
As you've shown in you 'apt-cache policy' those versions are not
'candidate' versions, but aptitude offers alternative solutions (one of
the benefits over apt-get), one of them being
BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 07/01/2010 03:51 PM, Didster wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> We use a local apt repository as a means to distribute our own
>> software. The software is not and will not ever be part of the
>> official Debian ar
Sort of - but it can actually do the install:
The following packages are BROKEN:
package-system
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
package-system: Depends: package1 (= 2.1.88) but it is not installable
Depends: package2 (= 2.1.88) but it is not installable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/01/2010 03:51 PM, Didster wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We use a local apt repository as a means to distribute our own
> software. The software is not and will not ever be part of the
> official Debian archives. Our software consist
On Jo, 01 iul 10, 20:51:05, Didster wrote:
[...]
> Then "apt-get install package-system" installs package-system 2.0.2
> along with V2.1.99 of the three packages. But "apt-get install
> package-system=2.0.1" fails as follows:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies.
> package-syste
Hi there,
We use a local apt repository as a means to distribute our own
software. The software is not and will not ever be part of the
official Debian archives. Our software consists of 4 packages, 3 real
ones, lets call then package1, package2 and package3 and a overall
package that exists to
>On Wednesday 11 January 2006 07:27,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Is there any way to moving a /usr/local installation into apt, meeting
>> > dependencies, etc. Most information is in the configure program with the
>> > application being compiled.
>>
>> Look at checkinstall.
>Yes, I got this on
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 07:27,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is there any way to moving a /usr/local installation into apt, meeting
> > dependencies, etc. Most information is in the configure program with the
> > application being compiled.
>
> Look at checkinstall.
Yes, I got this one for th
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:26:27PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Is there any way to moving a /usr/local installation into apt, meeting
> dependencies, etc. Most information is in the configure program with the
> application being compiled.
Look at checkinstall.
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Is there any way to moving a /usr/local installation into apt, meeting
dependencies, etc. Most information is in the configure program with the
application being compiled.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2004-04-07, Pete Clarke penned:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to run a local "apt" mirror for the machines on my local
> network. At the moment all Debian machines independantly do their own
> updates & dist-upgrades via one of the Debian web mirrors. This
> resu
Hi there,
Thanks for the sugesstions ... I will try apt-mirror later on and see what
happens.
Cheers,
Pete.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:19:52 +0100
"Pete Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to run a local "apt" mirror for the machines on my local
> network. At the moment all Debian machines independantly do their own
> updates & dist-upgrades via one of th
Hi there,
I would like to run a local "apt" mirror for the machines on my local
network. At the moment all Debian machines independantly do their own
updates & dist-upgrades via one of the Debian web mirrors.
This results in many duplicated downloads, what would the best way to setu
Hello,
i did a little rtfm now about 'dpkg-scanpckages'.
It wasn't as much difficult.
One has to provide the newly to create 'Packages' file in the
deb-packages-dir before updating apt.
There was some trouble because woody packages were mixed up with i guess
sarge, which confuses new built depen
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:42:18AM +0100, mi wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I asked a friend to ftp and burn down openoffice for woody from
> deb ftp://ftp.uninett.no/pub/linux/packages/openoffice-debian woody main
> contrib
>
> - the only 'url' i knew. I wasn't sure what exactly is needed, though.
> N
Hello all.
I asked a friend to ftp and burn down openoffice for woody from
deb ftp://ftp.uninett.no/pub/linux/packages/openoffice-debian woody main
contrib
- the only 'url' i knew. I wasn't sure what exactly is needed, though.
Now i've got a cd here with the following:
Two Packages-files located
19 matches
Mail list logo
