Re: Linux vs. SCO: 1-0

2003-12-07 Thread Tom
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 10:42:46PM -0200, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote: > Em Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:52:15 -0800, Tom escreveu: > > > I'm actively avoiding reading anything about it > > So why did you bother reading any message in this thread? Preview pane. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Linux vs. SCO: 1-0

2003-12-07 Thread Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
Em Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:52:15 -0800, Tom escreveu: > I'm actively avoiding reading anything about it So why did you bother reading any message in this thread? -- Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Belo Horizonte, Londrina, SÃo Paulo +55 (11) 5686 9607

Re: Linux vs. SCO: 1-0

2003-12-07 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:52:15 -0800, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 10:04:29AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote: > > > Still my bad. > > > > I'm just not sure to what extent I want to view this as linux vs. > > sco, or the gpl vs. sco, etc.

Re: Linux vs. SCO: 1-0

2003-12-07 Thread Tom
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 10:04:29AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote: > > Still my bad. > > I'm just not sure to what extent I want to view this as linux vs. sco, > or the gpl vs. sco, etc. Because ibm, while it has interests in linux, > may not have the deep-down conviction that some of us have whe

Re: Linux vs. SCO: 1-0

2003-12-07 Thread Monique Y. Herman
On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 at 10:45 GMT, Sneferu penned: > > Plus that Linus Torwalds was subpoenaed in trial. > > http://slashdot.org/articles/03/11/14/155201.shtml?tid=106&tid=185&tid=187&tid=8 A subpoena just means he's a witness =P > Still my bad. I'm just not sure to what extent I want to view t

Re: Linux vs. SCO: 1-0

2003-12-07 Thread Sneferu
Plus that Linus Torwalds was subpoenaed in trial. http://slashdot.org/articles/03/11/14/155201.shtml?tid=106&tid=185&tid=187&tid=88 Still my bad. At 06:08 07.12.2003, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 18:41:39 -0700, "Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Linux vs. SCO: 1-0

2003-12-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 18:41:39 -0700, "Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 at 01:29 GMT, Sneferu penned: > > > > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1405711,00.asp > > > > > > It looks like the 1st round was good for us ;-) > > > >

Re: Linux vs. SCO: 1-0

2003-12-06 Thread Monique Y. Herman
On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 at 01:29 GMT, Sneferu penned: > > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1405711,00.asp > > > It looks like the 1st round was good for us ;-) > > The "show me yours I'll show you main" game has started anyway. > Strange. I thought it was IBM vs SCO. -- monique -- To UN

Linux vs. SCO: 1-0

2003-12-06 Thread Sneferu
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1405711,00.asp It looks like the 1st round was good for us ;-) The "show me yours I'll show you main" game has started anyway. --- Catalin V. A. --- highly passionate about linux