d the same question on the AMD forum, but I haven't had an
answer so far.
https://community.amd.com/t5/drivers-software/how-to-install-official-amdgpu-linux-driver-on-debian-11/td-p/493903
Thank you for your attention.
Best Regards,
Markos
On 22/10/2021 01:19, Linux-Fan wrote:
Before your initial post, there was already some discussion about a very
similar case in the following thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/10/msg00700.html
Summary: Just following AMDs instructions may lead to compile errors
(see https://lists
Markos writes:
Em 17-10-2021 19:47, piorunz escreveu:
On 17/10/2021 22:27, Markos wrote:
Hi,
Please, could someone suggest a tutorial (for a basic user) on how to
install the driver for the graphics card for a laptop Lenovo IdeaPad
S145 with AMD Ryzen™ 5 3500U and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 running
On 21/10/2021 06:33, Felix Miata wrote:
Markos composed on 2021-10-21 00:29 (UTC-0300):
So, it seems that no one is interested in this question. :-(
Or none managed to do this installation, yet.
Could it be that readers here are content with the FOSS driver?
More likely readers here don'
Markos composed on 2021-10-21 00:29 (UTC-0300):
> So, it seems that no one is interested in this question. :-(
> Or none managed to do this installation, yet.
>
Coul
Em 17-10-2021 19:47, piorunz escreveu:
On 17/10/2021 22:27, Markos wrote:
Hi,
Please, could someone suggest a tutorial (for a basic user) on how to
install the driver for the graphics card for a laptop Lenovo IdeaPad
S145 with AMD Ryzen™ 5 3500U and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 running Debian 11
(Bu
On 17/10/2021 22:27, Markos wrote:
Hi,
Please, could someone suggest a tutorial (for a basic user) on how to
install the driver for the graphics card for a laptop Lenovo IdeaPad
S145 with AMD Ryzen™ 5 3500U and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 running Debian 11
(Bullseye).
I found a more complete tutorial
Hi,
Please, could someone suggest a tutorial (for a basic user) on how to
install the driver for the graphics card for a laptop Lenovo IdeaPad
S145 with AMD Ryzen™ 5 3500U and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 running Debian 11
(Bullseye).
I found a more complete tutorial just for Stretch and Buster:
ht
On Monday, June 18, 2018 08:44:20 AM Michael Stone wrote:
> He really doesn't want a sensible solution, just let it go.
+1
On 06/18/2018 07:17 AM, David wrote:
On 1 June 2018 at 00:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What is the make and model number of each computer?
No longer a relevant question.
I have purchas
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:17:21PM +1000, David wrote:
On 1 June 2018 at 00:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What is the make and model number of each computer?
He really doesn't want a se
On 1 June 2018 at 00:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What is the make and model number of each computer?
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 08:07:15AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 22:26 -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Richard Owlett writes:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers
> did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or
On 2018-06-07, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> This depends on what you mean by "universal". It was intended to be a
> protocol for computers to use to communicate with peripherals;
> "universal" in this context was restricted to peripherals.
And to the planet earth rather than all the way to the furthe
On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 22:26 -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Richard Owlett writes:
>
> > I have two computers with USB ports.
> > I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers
> > did.
> > Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
> > software at both end
Richard Owlett writes:
> On 06/01/2018 08:21 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
back and plays "gadget" [...]
Richard Owlett writes:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
> software at both ends.
>
> The underlying problem is that both ends egotistically expect to
On Fri 01 Jun 2018 at 09:08:53 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/01/2018 08:21 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >>>The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
> >>>back and plays "gadget" [...]
> >
> >>The gadge
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:16:47PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
USB-Ethernet dongles would be a lot more useful in the long term
than USB-Serial dongles.
*WHO* said anything about a "USB-Serial dongle"?
I want a USB-USB object. Subtle, but important, distinction.
Well, you started out talking
Richard,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:16:47PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/01/2018 09:01 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
> >I can't think of any applications where that's going to be better
> >over a pair of USB-Serial dongles than a pair of USB-Ethernet
> >dongles.
>
> Please read my stated goals
On 06/01/2018 09:01 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:56:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 05/31/2018 06:58 PM, David Wright wrote:
(thanks for your link) gives an idea of the price, and in this case I
can see some justification for it because they describe the
electronics
On Friday 01 June 2018 06:20:59 Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 05/31/2018 10:07 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> I have two computers with USB ports.
> >> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers
> >> did.
> >
> > What kind of "communicate" do you need there?
>
> Essentially an
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:01:57 -0400
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:56:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >On 05/31/2018 06:58 PM, David Wright wrote:
> >>(thanks for your link) gives an idea of the price, and in this case
> >>I can see some justification for it because they de
On Fri 01 Jun 2018 at 05:26:01 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/01/2018 01:27 AM, deloptes wrote:
> >Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >>I have two computers with USB ports.
> >>I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> >>Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or
On 06/01/2018 08:21 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
back and plays "gadget" [...]
The gadget API is the programming API off
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:56:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 05/31/2018 06:58 PM, David Wright wrote:
(thanks for your link) gives an idea of the price, and in this case I
can see some justification for it because they describe the
electronics hidden inside the plugs (we hope).
But consid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:23:42AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
> > back and plays "gadget" [...]
> The gadget API is the programming API offered by the kernel for the OTG
> ports: no
> The one choice you have is that one of both sides takes a step
> back and plays "gadget" (the jargon term, somewhat unfortunate
> as search engine fodder). There seems to be something out there
> for that, e.g. [2].
The gadget API is the programming API offered by the kernel for the OTG
ports: n
>> In some cases one of the two computers's USB port is an "OTG" port,
>> meaning that it can act either as "master" or not, in which case you can
>> just use a regular USB cable (and usually you then configure the OTG
>> side to pretend it's a network card, so it ends up looking to the
>> software
On 06/01/2018 01:27 AM, deloptes wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
software at both ends.
J., why not take a crossover cab
On 05/31/2018 10:07 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What kind of "communicate" do you need there?
Essentially any ;/
In fact one of the thought experiments I was pursuing was how to do file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:27:13AM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> > I have two computers with USB ports.
> > I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> > Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or a
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
> software at both ends.
>
J., why not take a crossover cable - all pcs have now ethernet por
> If none of that are options, you can resort to using an "ethernet
> dongle" on both sides and an ethernet cable between the two.
[ If one of the two computers has a free ethernet port, you can of
course also such a dongle on the other computer. ]
BTW, those ethernet dongles can be found pret
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
What kind of "communicate" do you need there?
The "way back machine" to simulate a "null modem" serial cable exists,
as you've seen, but it's rarely the best solution for nowadays's ne
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:21:27AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software software
> at both ends.
>
> The underlying problem i
Hi.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:21:27AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have two computers with USB ports.
> I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
> Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software software
> at both ends.
>
> The underly
I have two computers with USB ports.
I wish them to communicate as simply as mid-20th-century computers did.
Then we used RS232-C with a null modem &/or appropriate software
software at both ends.
The underlying problem is that both ends egotistically expect to be
*MASTER*.
The hardware pro
On 01/14/2014 06:03 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Debian Wheezy, stock kernel, ULD tarball downloaded from the Samsung
> website and compiled.
>
> I am getting the following error message:
>
> The components listed below are necessary for proper Unified Linux
> Driver operat
Debian Wheezy, stock kernel, ULD tarball downloaded from the Samsung
website and compiled.
I am getting the following error message:
The components listed below are necessary for proper Unified Linux
Driver operation. Click Cancel now, install these components from
your Linux distribution CD
On Thursday 23 June 2005 05:33 pm, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> With a Java client application you can use JDBC.
> With a Microsoft Application you can use ODBC.
>
> I would like to write a client application in GNOME witha GTK GUI.
> What driver would I use in this case?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott Hue
On Friday 24 Jun 2005 11:56, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> In addition, the Qt database API seems to be pretty popular. It looks like
> you're planning on a GNOME app, but you might try KDE instead.
Yes, especially in combination with KDevelop and QT-Designer, which will
automatically generate forms e
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 10:46:03PM +0100, Fred L Youhanaie wrote:
} Redefined Horizons wrote:
} >With a Java client application you can use JDBC.
} >With a Microsoft Application you can use ODBC.
} >
} >I would like to write a client application in GNOME witha GTK GUI.
} >What driver would I use in
Redefined Horizons wrote:
With a Java client application you can use JDBC.
With a Microsoft Application you can use ODBC.
I would like to write a client application in GNOME witha GTK GUI.
What driver would I use in this case?
I haven't tried this myself, Is unixODBC from http://www.odbc.org
On Thursday 23 Jun 2005 22:33, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> With a Java client application you can use JDBC.
> With a Microsoft Application you can use ODBC.
These are database abstraction layers.
> I would like to write a client application in GNOME witha GTK GUI.
> What driver would I use in thi
With a Java client application you can use JDBC.
With a Microsoft Application you can use ODBC.
I would like to write a client application in GNOME witha GTK GUI.
What driver would I use in this case?
Thanks,
Scott Huey
Hello,
I'm running on my HP nc6000 (with an external hp L1925 TFT-Monitor) Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r3, XFree86 4.3.0, the prorpietary ATI Radeon Linux driver, and as display manager GDM; XFree is configured to use 1280x1024 24bpp externally, and 1024x768 24bpp internally.
After booting the s
Hi
I am new to linux device drivers.
i have written a small driver with init_module and cleanup_module
compiled it using gcc -c option.
tried to load it using insmod but says that it is compiled with
kernel 2.4.20 but the current version is 2.4.20-8
how do i make it to compile it for this versi
The Argosy USB 2.0 / Firewire 2.5" Hard Disk Interface
is wholly usable in Linux.
I am running RedHat 9.0, and issuing 'uname -r' on my
linux box, it returns a kernel version 2.4.20-8... yeah!
I know... that's nothing out of this world!
To make things work nicely, there are a two files to
look at
I think this fits the thread, so I'll post it as a reply.
If you want to use the most recent ATI drivers on a 2.6.0-test7 kernel and/or
with a motherboard using the VIA KT400 chipset, some changes are needed.
You'll find a patch on the forums at www.rage3d.com (search for the Linux
messageboard
Ti recently (on October 8) released their new drivers for windows and
Linux. The README for the LInux driver claims that they successfully
built it against a 2.6.0-test6 kernel.
On a sort of offtopic note, while I am generally against propritery
software, especially device drivers, I think it is great
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:37:06PM -0600, Harshwardhan Nagaonkar wrote:
> Tom wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:48:15PM -0600, Harshwardhan Nagaonkar wrote:
> >
> >>Rob Sims wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thursday 09 October 2003 07:16 pm, Haralambos Geortgilakis wrote:
>
> >You can get the latest "unrele
Tom wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:48:15PM -0600, Harshwardhan Nagaonkar wrote:
Rob Sims wrote:
On Thursday 09 October 2003 07:16 pm, Haralambos Geortgilakis wrote:
You can get the latest "unreleased" ATI drivers at:
http://www.schneider-digital.de/html/download_ati.html
Cool. However, ATI ha
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:48:15PM -0600, Harshwardhan Nagaonkar wrote:
> Rob Sims wrote:
> >On Thursday 09 October 2003 07:16 pm, Haralambos Geortgilakis wrote:
[snip]
> Hmm... well I'm glad you were fortunate enough to get the kernel module
> working on a 2.6 kernel (aren't the ATI prop. modules
Rob Sims wrote:
On Thursday 09 October 2003 07:16 pm, Haralambos Geortgilakis wrote:
KDE works when I use the "radeon" driver, but I get no DRI.
Where do I go from here? I didn't find a user forum for the ATI drivers,
just a no-response bug reporting link.
Hmm... well I'm glad you were fortun
On Thursday 09 October 2003 07:16 pm, Haralambos Geortgilakis wrote:
> Hi yall,
>
> subject says what wants said. Follow the yellow brick url too
>
> http://www.ati.com/support/drivers/linux/radeon-linux.html?type=linux&prodType=graphic&prod=productsLINUXdriver&submit.x=18&submit.y=10
I trie
Hi yall,
subject says what wants said. Follow the yellow brick url too
http://www.ati.com/support/drivers/linux/radeon-linux.html?type=linux&prodType=graphic&prod=productsLINUXdriver&submit.x=18&submit.y=10
There are specific Debianized instructions too.
Kudos to rage3d for the link.
*BFN*
on Japan has produced a
Linux driver for it that gives the same print quality as you get from the
Windows drivers. It is fabulous!! Never before have I seen such good
quality from a colour printer on Linux! There is a gui tool for setting
paper & print quality etc. too. The driver works through y
Is there a Linux driver for the Cisco 605 "modem" for DSL
subscribers? US West says that UNIX is not compatible with
it (although the 675 router/"modem" is, with a NIC installed).
Will the existing driver(s) for modems work with the 605?
Art Lemasters
BTW, it's g
Hello Hubert:
If you need this driver to run X, starting at card number 227 in the
xf86config program are the Matrox cards.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 6:09 AM
Subject: Linux
Dear colleague,
I need linux driver for Matrox Millenium II.
Where can I find that?
Hubert
Hi!I hava a Western Digital
WD7193 SCSI Controller and it is not compatible to the WD7000 Driver.If
I don't get a driver for WD7193,WD7197,WD7296 or compatible SCSI Controllers I
willnever be able to use Linux because my harddrives and CDRom drives are
conntected to it.And there is not driv
Hi!
I need a driver for the Western
Digital SCSI Controller WD7193 (WD7197,WD7296 schould work, too).
The WD7000 does not work (can't mount
root fs) and without such a driver I will never be able to use Linux because my
harddrives and cdroms are connectet to the WD7193 controller.
Please hel
63 matches
Mail list logo
