On Wed, Jul 27, 2016, at 14:29, Brian wrote:
>
> ...
> for one machine, probably ancient but still doing a useful
> job, I have
>
> model name : Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS
>
> That's not enough, is it? What has to done to determine its processor
> class?
>
> I'm happy enou
On 2016-07-27 19:29 +0100, Brian wrote:
> A 686-class processor is required for stretch
>
> Within the meaning of the Act - what is meant by "686-class processor"?
> Is this something to do with processor instructions and can it be
> determined from 'cat /proc/cpuinfo'?
Yes, this is already men
On Wed 27 Jul 2016 at 11:18:21 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 21:17:40 (-0400), Stephen Powell wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, at 19:05, David Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > One issue though: I have a useful laptop that has a nifty 686 (AIUI)
> > > Pentium M processor, but I have
On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 21:17:40 (-0400), Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, at 19:05, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > One issue though: I have a useful laptop that has a nifty 686 (AIUI)
> > Pentium M processor, but I have to run linux-image-3.16.0-4-586 on it
> > because it lacks the PAE.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, at 19:05, David Wright wrote:
>
> One issue though: I have a useful laptop that has a nifty 686 (AIUI)
> Pentium M processor, but I have to run linux-image-3.16.0-4-586 on it
> because it lacks the PAE. (It has SSE/SSE2.) Do you know whether
> stretch will cater for non-PAE
On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 22:28:24 (+0200), Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2016-07-26 15:04 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > Does this mean that the days of running Debian on an old box in the
> > corner are now numbered, or should a bug be filed against making
> > such apt-related packages depend on such "mod
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 18:47:11 Johann Klammer wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 04:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > Telling us your requirements, will make making a recommendation easier.
>
> I did. it's just those two things...
> ...
> kinda thought it was obvious, that the problem is my boxen being too
>
On 2016-07-26 15:04 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 19:47:11 (+0200), Johann Klammer wrote:
>> On 07/26/2016 04:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> >
>> > Telling us your requirements, will make making a recommendation easier.
>> >
>> I did. it's just those two things...
>> ...
>>
On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 19:47:11 (+0200), Johann Klammer wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 04:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > Telling us your requirements, will make making a recommendation easier.
> >
> I did. it's just those two things...
> ...
> kinda thought it was obvious, that the problem is my box
Le nonidi 9 thermidor, an CCXXIV, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> Why use Stretch if the software in it ios too new for your boxen??
Old software have unpatched security issues. And it is not the software that
is too new, it is the build options.
> Of course it is not obvious!!
It was to me, at least.
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 18:47:11 Johann Klammer wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 04:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > Telling us your requirements, will make making a recommendation easier.
>
> I did. it's just those two things...
Why use Stretch if the software in it ios too new for your boxen??
> ...
> ki
On 07/26/2016 04:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Telling us your requirements, will make making a recommendation easier.
>
I did. it's just those two things...
...
kinda thought it was obvious, that the problem is my boxen being too
old to run that stuff.
To be more specific, something I tried
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 12:49:35 Felix Miata wrote:
> Johann Klammer composed on 2016-07-26 11:35 (UTC+0200):
> > Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
> >
> > I have special needs:
> > binary packages.
> > i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
> >
> > any advice?
>
> Take a
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:35:54 +0200 Johann Klammer
wrote:
> Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
Be more specific,please.
> I have special needs:
What are they?
> binary packages.
Most all distros have that option
> i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
>
> any a
On 07/26/2016 11:35 AM, Johann Klammer wrote:
Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
I have special needs:
binary packages.
i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
The only one I can think of off the top of my head that isn't
based on Debian that still fulfills your criteri
Johann Klammer composed on 2016-07-26 11:35 (UTC+0200):
Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
I have special needs:
binary packages.
i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
any advice?
Take a look here:
http://www.mepiscommunity.org/wiki
http://antix.mepis.org/index
Johann Klammer composed on 2016-07-26 11:35 (UTC+0200):
Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
I have special needs:
binary packages.
i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
any advice?
Take a look here:
http://www.mepiscommunity.org/wiki
http://antix.mepis.org/index
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 10:35:54 Johann Klammer wrote:
> Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
>
> I have special needs:
> binary packages.
> i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
>
> any advice?
https://distrowatch.com/
http://www.infoworld.com/article/2687088/linux/how-to
On 07/26/2016 11:35 AM, Johann Klammer wrote:
> Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
>
> I have special needs:
> binary packages.
> i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
Well, if you don't tell us why Debian doesn't work for you
any more, then it will probably not be e
Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
I have special needs:
binary packages.
i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
any advice?
On Sunday, 8 January 2006 at 21:13:17 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Angus Mackenzie wrote:
> > The Tasksel stage of the installer could indeed make life easier for the
> > neophyte. It could strongly advise them to install a desktop environment by
> > default and make the choice of a console an opti
Andy Streich wrote:
> Steve, rather than defending the status quo perhaps you could bend a little
> and hear the request being made in a different light.
I'm not defending the status quo, I am pointing out the inaccuracies in
what people are posting. I'm all for doing things better, believe
On Sunday 08 January 2006 10:30 am, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Chris Howie wrote:
> > And if that's the case then you select both of them during the install.
>
> On an advanced install that's exactly what you do.
>
> > Except that Debian put Gnome there when all I selected was "Desktop
> > environment
Angus Mackenzie wrote:
> The Tasksel stage of the installer could indeed make life easier for the
> neophyte. It could strongly advise them to install a desktop environment by
> default and make the choice of a console an option for those who Know What
> They Are Doing, as I do 7 or 8 machines l
Steve Lamb wrote:
Joris Huizer wrote:
I think, if the newbie just wants kde because of some fancy screenshots,
it's too hard for him/her; remember the newbie doesn't know the
character '/' upons up a search in so many linux/unix tools, so he/she
is completely lost in an unknown interface
Why wo
Joris Huizer wrote:
> I think, if the newbie just wants kde because of some fancy screenshots,
> it's too hard for him/her; remember the newbie doesn't know the
> character '/' upons up a search in so many linux/unix tools, so he/she
> is completely lost in an unknown interface
> Why would it compl
Steve Lamb wrote:
How hard can it be to give the user a choice during the install, and why is
that such a stupid idea according to you?
You are given a choice. You just refuse to see that.
the way to choose is fine by me, but, for example, manually going
through aptitude and finding
I was that newbie 18 months ago!
Debian was my first experience of Linux and I found ending up at a console
after my first installation surprising and difficult. I got through it with
lots of reading of documentation and googling, followed by a blundering and
error prone crash course in apt-get
Chris Howie wrote:
> And if that's the case then you select both of them during the install.
On an advanced install that's exactly what you do.
> Except that Debian put Gnome there when all I selected was "Desktop
> environment." Come on, you know that Linux users tend to value specificity.
Chris Howie wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Or the system is going to have multiple users who might want different DEs.
And if that's the case then you select both of them during the install.
I still haven't
uninstalled Gnome, something I've been meaning to do for a long time, but
haven
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Or the system is going to have multiple users who might want different DEs.
And if that's the case then you select both of them during the install.
>>I still haven't
>>uninstalled Gnome, something I've been meaning to do for a long time, but
>>haven't had the willpower to spen
Don Jackson wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
>> Don Jackson writes:
>>>
>>> I still don't know WHY there isn't a choice of desktops given the person
>>> installing Debian.
>>
>>
>> There is a choice of desktops. There is a choice of _everything_.
>
> OK, in the small context of the above quote, rev
Chris Howie wrote:
> Except now you're missing twice the disk space. Seriously, installing both
> DEs
> is a complete waste of space, unless the user is interested in evaluating both
> DEs to see which one he likes better.
Or the system is going to have multiple users who might want differen
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Because (IIRC) the change is quite simple before the first login from the
> GDM screen. I believe barring any user intervention to the contrary when a
> GUI environment is selected *both* are installed and the user can choose his
> poison from the GDM dropdown. Certainly d
Don Jackson wrote:
> Admittedly this is not a scientific poll, and I'm not interested in
> starting (another) flame war over KDE vs. GNOME (send those comments to
> /dev/null please), but I am interested in seeing the Debian Installer
> give the user a choice during installation.
Because (IIRC
Don Jackson wrote:
This may be considered "off topic" by some, but I just stumbled on an
interesting website with a program called "Linux Distribution Chooser".
Even though I've been with Debian for a couple years now, I thought I'd
just test out the "chooser
On 06 Jan 2006, Don Jackson wrote:
> This may be considered "off topic" by some, but I just stumbled on an
> interesting website with a program called "Linux Distribution Chooser".
> Even though I've been with Debian for a couple years now, I thought I'd
>
John Hasler wrote:
> Don Jackson writes:
>
>>I still don't know WHY there isn't a choice of desktops given the person
>>installing Debian.
>
>
> There is a choice of desktops. There is a choice of _everything_.
OK, in the small context of the above quote, revise that to say:
"I still don't kno
D-kewl.
I made honest selections regarding the last few builds with Debian I have
done AND it selected Debian.
I think of the Debian installer as at least a semi-GUI interface, but I
guess it isn't!
RbtBotL
Craig - ><>
oBU SysAdmin
/|\ 607 777 6827
^ Tot Ziens
--
To UNSUBSCR
Don Jackson writes:
> I still don't know WHY there isn't a choice of desktops given the person
> installing Debian.
There is a choice of desktops. There is a choice of _everything_.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Don Jackson escreveu:
This may be considered "off topic" by some, but I just stumbled on an
interesting website with a program called "Linux Distribution Chooser".
Even though I've been with Debian for a couple years now, I thought I'd
just t
This may be considered "off topic" by some, but I just stumbled on an
interesting website with a program called "Linux Distribution Chooser".
Even though I've been with Debian for a couple years now, I thought I'd
just test out the "chooser"...
http://www
Oana Serb wrote:
> I read the documentation from your website about what "free software"
> means but I still have some questions.
> Our product is a computer modified for dedicated use.
> On this computer we want to use Debian/GNU Linux distribution for an
> operat
Hello,
I read the documentation from your website about what "free software"
means but I still have some questions. I hope you can clarify them for
me.
Our product is a computer modified for dedicated use.
On this computer we want to use Debian/GNU Linux distribution for an
operat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oana Serb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to download your Linux distribution and I want to change it, in
> order to make my own distribution. If I do this, do I have the right to
> sell it?
I am not a lawyer, but in the m
On 2004-11-10, Oana Serb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to download your Linux distribution and I want to change it, in
> order to make my own distribution. If I do this, do I have the right to
> sell it?
Yes. There already are many distributions based on Debian, such as
Xa
http://www.debian.org/social_contract
http://www.debian.org/intro/free
http://www.debian.org
I would strongly suggest starting by reading the excellent documentation
available online .
Cheers
Thierry
Oana Serb wrote:
Hello,
I want to download your Linux distribution and I want to change it, in
Hello,
I want to download your Linux distribution and I want to change it, in
order to make my own distribution. If I do this, do I have the right to
sell it?
Thank you,
Oana Serb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Sure. Be if one can easily install rpm packages on a Debian system,
> this would be a good message sent to the corporate world.
>
I don't think so. The kind of corporate type who even know there is such
a difference will understand why .debs are bet
on Mon, May 17, 2004 at 11:07:01AM +0200, Dominique Dumont ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
>
> >> and I found that it can't find files it need in deb DB,I had been
> >> tried to install it on debian,
> >> #rpm -ivh myproduct-xxx-xx.rpm
> >> the program will
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 04:10:39PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > So the questions are now:
> >
> > - does the Debian community want Debian to be used in corporate world
> > to run *proprietary* softwares ?
>
> Personally, yes. I think many people have that ideal. It i
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> >> #rpm -ivh myproduct-xxx-xx.rpm
> >
> > As other people have written doing this is not a good thing. Put
> > yourself in the other position. I have a .deb file from Debian. I
> > want to install it on a RH system. Should I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
>> and I found that it can't find files it need in deb DB,I had been
>> tried to install it on debian,
>> #rpm -ivh myproduct-xxx-xx.rpm
>> the program will prompt: myproduct need perl >5.6, and the bash must
>> be installed
>
> As other people have writt
Incoming from Damon L. Chesser:
>
> There could be no World Peace while RPM exists freely and is so widely
> supported by fanatical users with no regard for ease of use or superior
> methods. We simply can not compromise!
Ah, geez. A day doesn't go by lately that someone isn't declaring war
on
Rick wrote:
> Yes,I think so.but our procedure depend rpm format,
I think you are confusing a packaging format with your program. You
program undoubtedly depends upon shared libraries and other things.
But it is packaged into a distribution format. It can be packaged
into many different formats.
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Silvan:
On Friday 14 May 2004 11:19 pm, Paul E Condon wrote:
packages because the Debian community believes its deb packaging system is
superior to the rpm system.* Debian also has a social commitment to free
* Actually, it _is_ superior, but I'm tryin
Incoming from Silvan:
> On Friday 14 May 2004 11:19 pm, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> > packages because the Debian community believes its deb packaging system is
> > superior to the rpm system.* Debian also has a social commitment to free
>
> > * Actually, it _is_ superior, but I'm trying to be nice.
On Saturday 15 May 2004 01:16 am, Kevin Mark wrote:
> its stability it will get moved to testing. And then if all goes well,
> it moves into stable. its stability and interaction with other packages
> are the criteria that the debian packager of an authors work uses to
> judge when it is moved to
On Friday 14 May 2004 11:19 pm, Paul E Condon wrote:
> packages because the Debian community believes its deb packaging system is
> superior to the rpm system.* Debian also has a social commitment to free
> * Actually, it _is_ superior, but I'm trying to be nice.
Vastly so. No need to be nice a
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 01:16:09AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:50:00PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> > I imagine there are cases in which this approach won't work, but we
> > see the same thing from people everyday who are limiting themselves
> > to only using debian tools.
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:40:51PM +0800, Rick wrote:
Hello People:
Our product is base on redhat,I will porting it to Debian,but in this
system,many procedure depend redhat rpms,for example:
glibc-2.3.2-11.9.i386.rpm, perl-5.8.0-88.i386.rpm,etc..
At the start,I wanted to try install these r
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:50:00PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Paul E Condon:
> > On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:40:51PM +0800, Rick wrote:
> > >
> > > Our product is base on redhat,I will porting it to Debian,but in this
> > > system,many procedure depend redhat rpms,for example:
>
Incoming from Paul E Condon:
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:40:51PM +0800, Rick wrote:
> >
> > Our product is base on redhat,I will porting it to Debian,but in this
> > system,many procedure depend redhat rpms,for example:
> > glibc-2.3.2-11.9.i386.rpm, perl-5.8.0-88.i386.rpm,etc..
>
> Some mi
w to do it?
>
> I am a new debian user,not too familiar with this OS, If above ways are
> impossible,is thers other ways to attain my purpose?
>
Rick,
Debian is a GNU/Linux distribution in its own right. It does not use rpm packages
because the Debian community believes its deb packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Rick:
# #rpm -ivh myproduct-xxx-xx.rpm
# the program will prompt: myproduct need perl >5.6, and the bash must be installed
# In fact,the 2 debian packages has been installed,I think rpm command will read info
from only rpm DB on debian.
>> Our product is base on redhat,I will porting it to Debian,but in this
>> system,many procedure depend redhat rpms,for example:
>> glibc-2.3.2-11.9.i386.rpm, perl-5.8.0-88.i386.rpm,etc..
>> At the start,I wanted to try install these rpm packages(from redhat)
> Once you have done that, t
Thank you for your help,I should check the alien manual in detail first.
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:40:51PM +0800, Rick wrote:
> Our product is base on redhat,I will porting it to Debian,but in this
> system,many procedure depend redhat rpms,for example:
> glibc-2.3.2-11.9.i386.rpm, perl-5.8.0-88.i386.rpm,etc..
> At the start,I wanted to try install these rpm p
On (12/05/04 17:40), Rick wrote:
> Hello People:
> Our product is base on redhat,I will porting it to Debian,but in this
> system,many procedure depend redhat rpms,for example:
> glibc-2.3.2-11.9.i386.rpm, perl-5.8.0-88.i386.rpm,etc..
> At the start,I wanted to try install these rpm packag
Hello People:
Our product is base on redhat,I will porting it to Debian,but in this
system,many procedure depend redhat rpms,for example:
glibc-2.3.2-11.9.i386.rpm, perl-5.8.0-88.i386.rpm,etc..
At the start,I wanted to try install these rpm packages(from redhat) On
debian,but I found that
hi ya
a modified toms root-boot will be a linux distro on one floppy...
some tweeking needed with initrd files
busybox sounds like a fun project to go look at though
and if 1.44 floppy is too small... a 4Mb flash is good too ...
( easy enough to squeeze 16Mb-32Mb of linux os into it )
-
Uses syslinux, busybox, and make.
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~majewski/giab/
-chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:43, laurence wilson wrote:
> where can i get a cd with the linux program on it.. to install on my
> computer?? thanks
> laurence
The web site
http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendors
Contains a list of vendors.
Alternati
previously any
applet caused netscape to crash with a bus error).
And they run faster than Netscape 4 for Windoze to boot! :).
Also, I just noticed a new linux distribution: "stampede" linux. -
www.stampede.org.
They claim that the reason for their distribution is to have one which
new user
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The KDE project is starting to make some configuration programs.. I
>haven't used all of these programs, but the ones I've used are really
>good.
>
>sysv init editor
>user editor (w/ quota options)
>kdm configuration
>filesyste
John Spence writes:
> I'd like to see more scripts like my Debian sendmailconfig script. Not
> only does it ask you the correct questions but it is a great source of
> information for understanding sendmail and script writing.
I'm working on one for ppp right now. I'll have it ready for you to tr
>> This is James from S.u.S.E.. Thanks to Tom Schaefer for the good
>> rundown.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I have found a great use for every distribution I have encountered and
>> > they're all good. ANY of the Linux distributions makes an excellent
>> > choice. (see
>> > http://www.linux.org check the
I'm having a little trouble with configuring my card. I have the 250MHz
type with 8 megs of ram.. anyhow, when I switch to another console and
return, the screen is shifted about 5" and wrapped around the other side..
Also, the X doesn't fill the screen correctly -- squished verticall
The KDE project is starting to make some configuration programs.. I
haven't used all of these programs, but the ones I've used are really
good.
sysv init editor
user editor (w/ quota options)
kdm configuration
filesystem analyser + mount/unmount (intergraded with desktop)
ppp (never used it, but i
> I'm having a little trouble with configuring my card. I have the 250MHz
> type with 8 megs of ram.. anyhow, when I switch to another console and
> return, the screen is shifted about 5" and wrapped around the other side..
> Also, the X doesn't fill the screen correctly -- squished vertically an
I'm having a little trouble with configuring my card. I have the 250MHz
type with 8 megs of ram.. anyhow, when I switch to another console and
return, the screen is shifted about 5" and wrapped around the other side..
Also, the X doesn't fill the screen correctly -- squished vertically and
too wi
[GUI admin stuff snipped]
> Webmin and Linuxconf has the same idea. Maybe we could tinker with it and
> start from there.
I'd like to see more scripts like my Debian sendmailconfig script. Not
only does it ask you the correct questions but it is a great source of
information for understanding sen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Spence) writes:
> One interesting point: I've noticed that it is very common for
> people to move to Debian after using other distributions. I would
> make a guess and claim that there aren't too many people who migrate
> from Debian to another dist after using Debian for
> I'm pretty sure it's GPL'd. Thanks a lot. maybe you could package it and
> put it in the contrib or whatever.
If it's GPL'd, it can go in main. Not sure what it'll take to get it
working under Debian, though.
> I'm assuming your a Debian Developer?
Yep. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>What package is the Millenium II support under? SVGA?
>
>Paul
>
Yes. The hamm (unstable) distribution of xbase+xserver-vga (Debian)
has already the Millenium II option.
At\'e breve
===
Pedro Quaresma de Almeida
Departamento de Matem\'atica
Faculdade de Ci\^encias e T
On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, John Spence wrote:
> One interesting point: I've noticed that it is very common for people to
> move to Debian after using other distributions. I would make a guess and
> claim that there aren't too many people who migrate from Debian to another
> dist after using Debian for a
Hi!
This is James from S.u.S.E.. Thanks to Tom Schaefer for the good
rundown.
[...]
I have found a great use for every distribution I have encountered and
> they're all good. ANY of the Linux distributions makes an excellent choice.
> (see
> http://www.linux.org check the distributions page)
R
What package is the Millenium II support under? SVGA?
Paul
On 5 Feb 1998, Pedro Quaresma de Almeida wrote:
>
> > Lal Dissanayake Jnr wrote:
> > >
> > > Also, which X windows server would go best with a Millenium 2 card?
> >
>
> The last version of XFree86 supports the Millenium II card!
> I
> Lal Dissanayake Jnr wrote:
> >
> > Also, which X windows server would go best with a Millenium 2 card?
>
The last version of XFree86 supports the Millenium II card!
If you choose Debian you must install the libc6 system.
I have this card with a Debian Box and they work nicely.
See the foll
se any problems/questions you encounter along the way will be
answered promptly by this list's membership. Another great reason to
choose Debian.
Good luck!
__ Reply Separator _____
Subject: Which Linux distributio
On Fri, Feb 06, 1998 at 04:34:52AM +1100, Lal Dissanayake Jnr wrote:
> Could you guys suggest which Linux distribution I should install on my
> system. Ive been using UNIX with X11 for quite a while now, so Im looking
> for the best, not something for newbies.
If you aren't a new
Tim Sailer wrote:
> Lal Dissanayake Jnr wrote:
>
> > Could you guys suggest which Linux distribution I should install on my
> > system. Ive been using UNIX with X11 for quite a while now, so Im looking
> > for the best, not something for newbies.
>
> Since you a
Lal Dissanayake Jnr wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Could you guys suggest which Linux distribution I should install on my
> system. Ive been using UNIX with X11 for quite a while now, so Im looking
> for the best, not something for newbies.
Since you are asking on a Debian list,
Hi all,
Could you guys suggest which Linux distribution I should install on my
system. Ive been using UNIX with X11 for quite a while now, so Im looking
for the best, not something for newbies.
Also, which X windows server would go best with a Millenium 2 card?
my system is as follows,
Pentium
great..., debian 328 compare to the nearest redhat 272 votes, good work
debian, love you
regards
kusuma
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> At http://www.slashdot.org/, there is a poll of favorite linux
> distributions. I encourage you all to go vote for debian, which is currently
> trailing redhat by about 50
>> At http://www.slashdot.org/, there is a poll of favorite linux
>> distributions. I encourage you all to go vote for debian, which
>> is currently trailing redhat by about 50 votes.
>
>Has anyone advertized this on whatever Redhat (and the other
>distributions) have as user lists? While it mig
> At http://www.slashdot.org/, there is a poll of favorite linux
> distributions. I encourage you all to go vote for debian, which
> is currently trailing redhat by about 50 votes.
Has anyone advertized this on whatever Redhat (and the other
distributions) have as user lists? While it might be ni
Looks like a well-done site to me! I like the "torn-page" edges...
Excerpt follows :-)
Your Vote has Been Registered.
Caldera 11
Debian 303
RedHat 259
Slackware 108
Othe
On Mon, 24 Nov 1997, Gary L. Dolan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 1997 at 02:18:11AM +, Manos Papantoniou wrote:
> > but how do you vote? and where are the current results?
> >
> > I went to the URL you give and it's a REAL MESS
> >
> > Joey Hess wrote:
> > >
> > > At http://www.slashdot.org/
>I just voted for Debian, we are ahead with 239, red hat 219
What I find most interesting is the number of people using either RedHat or
Debian vs. all others (Of course, maybe Slackware users don't know
about the survey)
I clipped the following from the results page and added percentage
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
