On Sunday 26 September 2004 23:26, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> Ronald wrote:
> > I often try out (installing) Linux distributions, so
> > this is an I/O intensive operation (writing to the drive).
> I was wondering the same and was about to post a similar message to the
> list. I feel as if my up-to-d
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:36:24PM -0400, David Clymer wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 00:26, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> > I was wondering the same and was about to post a similar message to the
> > list. I feel as if my up-to-date Debian box (P4 3GHZ / Intel 875PBZ / 1
> > GIG RAM / WD ATA 133 Caviar S
Tim Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 06 September 2004 00:00, Ronald wrote:
> > I often try out (installing) Linux distributions, so
> > this is an I/O intensive operation (writing to the drive).
> >
> > Would using SCSI drive significantly improve the installing
> > time? (halve it?
On Monday 06 September 2004 00:00, Ronald wrote:
> I often try out (installing) Linux distributions, so
> this is an I/O intensive operation (writing to the drive).
>
> Would using SCSI drive significantly improve the installing
> time? (halve it?)
Yes, from CD/DVD of course.
> FYI currently I us
Ronald wrote:
I often try out (installing) Linux distributions, so
this is an I/O intensive operation (writing to the drive).
Would using SCSI drive significantly improve the installing
time? (halve it?)
FYI currently I use Seagate 7200.7 80 GB and to get
full 3 GB install takes around ~10 to 20 mi
I often try out (installing) Linux distributions, so
this is an I/O intensive operation (writing to the drive).
Would using SCSI drive significantly improve the installing
time? (halve it?)
FYI currently I use Seagate 7200.7 80 GB and to get
full 3 GB install takes around ~10 to 20 minutes.
Motherb
6 matches
Mail list logo
