Re: Linux 2.1.28

1997-03-20 Thread Christian Leutloff
Peter Iannarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I have in my /etc/init.d/network is > > ifconfig lo 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 > route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 > Hi Peter, and listers, This is my /etc/init.d/network > > #!/bin/sh > ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 > route add -net 1

RE: Linux 2.1.28

1997-03-18 Thread Peter Iannarelli
Hi Richard: What I have in my /etc/init.d/network is ifconfig lo 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 When the system boots and I run a netstat, my lo network interface doesn't show up. Why?, I don't know. However when I issue a ifconfig, the lo interface shows

Re: Linux 2.1.28

1997-03-18 Thread Richard Morin
On Wed, 12 Mar 1997, Peter Iannarelli wrote: > 2.The pppd reports a netmask error once LCP negotiation is > complete even if a netmask is provided in either of the options > files. > > 3.The /etc/init.d/network file is not compatible between > 2.1.2 and 2.1.28. A netma

Linux 2.1.28

1997-03-13 Thread Peter Iannarelli
Hello all: I have recently upgraded my debian system from 2.1.2 to 2.1.28 because of the SMP support and found the following problems. 1. Masquerading doesn't work in 2.1.28 2. The pppd reports a netmask error once LCP negotiation is complete even if a netmask is provided in e