On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
> I posted a message to linux-kernel to help me in a small paper
> that I have to do for tomorrow and dont see an answer. It is a few
> related questions about Linux + SMP. If there is a Linux kernel guru
> in th
ers,
> > I posted a message to linux-kernel to help me in a small paper that
> > I
> > have to do for tomorrow and dont see an answer. It is a few related
> > questions
> > about Linux + SMP. If there is a Linux kernel guru in this list that can
> > answ
Read the SMP-HOWTO
Sean
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
>
> Hi all Debian users,
> I posted a message to linux-kernel to help me in a small paper that I
> have to do for tomorrow and dont see an answer. It is a few related questions
> about Linux + SMP
Hi all Debian users,
I posted a message to linux-kernel to help me in a small paper that I
have to do for tomorrow and dont see an answer. It is a few related questions
about Linux + SMP. If there is a Linux kernel guru in this list that can
answer my questions I will thanks a lot
On Tue, 3 Nov 1998, George Bonser wrote:
[ snip ]
: You have three choices:
:
: 1. Live with it
: 2. Compile a non-SMB kernel
: 3. move to a 2.1.x kernel.
FWIW, we have a server that gets the crap kicked out of it
(debian.midco.net) which is running 2.1.125 - it's an IBM Server 325
with du
Hi,
I have had problems before but now I am running Debian Linux on an SMP
machine and it crashes once a week or so. It locks real hard and all I can
do is press the on/off switch to get started.
I suspected the memory but all the tests I know of do not seem to
indicate the problem is with the mem
Philip Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm wonder, and perhap some you linux buffs could help. HOw great is the
> performance gain from SMP?
I run on a two processor pentium pro machine all of the time - for doing
development, "make -j [ something >1 ]" gives about double compilation
speed,
>HOw great is the performance gain from SMP? I have been debating this
>with a friend. I know linux has muli-threaded capability, but like the
I'm not a linux guru, in fact, I'd label myself as a linux struggler. That
aside, I can tell you that the performance gain of multiple processors
entire
>HOw great is the performance gain from SMP? I have been debating this
>with a friend. I know linux has muli-threaded capability, but like the
I'm not a linux guru, in fact, I'd label myself as a linux struggler. That
aside, I can tell you that the performance gain of multiple processors
entire
I'm wonder, and perhap some you linux buffs could help.
HOw great is the performance gain from SMP? I have been debating this
with a friend. I know linux has muli-threaded capability, but like the
kernal isn't explicitly multithreaded(or is it), yeah you can compile it
for multiple processors, an
Is Linux with SMP more stable in 2.1 than in 2.0 ?
I have random lockups under heavy load. I've tried the shed.c patches
from Leonard Zubkoff on the linux-smp mailing-list without any
success...
If yes, which 2.1 version is ok ?
Does debian (hamm) works ok with 2.1 ?
Thanks for any
Ricardo Kleemann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi guys...
:
: I'm wondering if attempting to use Linux-SMP is any good. Afterall, for
: real efficiency, don't the programs/daemons/utilities have to be designed
: in such a way that they'll make use of SMP capabilities?
The op
Hi guys...
I'm wondering if attempting to use Linux-SMP is any good. Afterall, for
real efficiency, don't the programs/daemons/utilities have to be designed
in such a way that they'll make use of SMP capabilities?
For example, if I have sendmail, pop3d, httpd daemons run
13 matches
Mail list logo
