On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 10:07:50AM -0400, dman wrote:
> | | I'm building 2.2.19 for that router now. Cool, I'll try building
> tulip in | statically and see if it works. Thanks.
>
> I'm interested in knowing if that works for you.
So you know, it did work. My firewall/router is now runn
on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 10:12:55AM -0400, dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:31:39AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | Yes, Compaq is quite skilled in the "stupid" department.
>
> I found that out with my Compaq. I tried to add another hard drive,
> but the BIOS could
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:31:39AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Yes, Compaq is quite skilled in the "stupid" department.
I found that out with my Compaq. I tried to add another hard drive,
but the BIOS could only see it in "Cable Select" mode. Thus it
couldn't be on the same IDE bus as anyt
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:12:25PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:55:00PM -0400, dman wrote:
| >
| > Oh, old kernel and new NIC. I had only a rev2.0 NIC back when I was
| > using kernels older than 2.2.19. My rev4.1 NIC has only been tried
| > (and worked) with 2.2
Yes, Compaq is quite skilled in the "stupid" department.
In a message dated 8/30/01 1:04:51 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Ok, I am pleased to announce that my card seems to be working now. I
could ping one computer from the other over my LAN. The problem seems to
h
To get into your BIOS, try pressing F10 a TON at boot time. If that won't
work, try other key combinations. If that doesn't work, unplug the power
cable from one of your hard disks and boot up. The BIOS should complain about
it, and, hopefully ask you if you want to F1-Continue or F2-Setup (go t
t: Re: Linksys EtherFast 10/100 v5 has no IRQ
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:28:56PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Like I said, I don't kno why there is no IRQ for the NIC. I've tried
> compiling the code you sent me, I'm attaching the output I got back. I
used
> the co
Ok, I am pleased to announce that my card seems to be working now. I could
ping one computer from the other over my LAN. The problem seems to have rested
in the infinite stupidity of whoever built this Compaq... because I pulled one
pci card out, moved my nic to the now empty pci slot, and sud
Ok, I am pleased to announce that my card seems to be working now. I could
ping one computer from the other over my LAN. The problem seems to have rested
in the infinite stupidity of whoever built this Compaq... because I pulled one
pci card out, moved my nic to the now empty pci slot, and sud
On Wed, 29 August 2001, "Michael P. Soulier" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:07:02AM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> >
> > "gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/net/inet
> > -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c tulip.c
> > '[ -f /usr/include/linux/modver
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:07:02AM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
> "gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/net/inet
> -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c tulip.c
> '[ -f /usr/include/linux/modversions.h ] && echo
> -DMODVERSIONS`"
Note btw that
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:28:56PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Like I said, I don't kno why there is no IRQ for the NIC. I've tried
> compiling the code you sent me, I'm attaching the output I got back. I used
> the command I found in the readme file on the disk. I used the code you
> s
On Wed, 29 August 2001, "Michael P. Soulier" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:03:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a Linksys Etherfast 10/100, I think it's revision 3, though. All you
> > should need to do is enable the driver in the kernel, compile, then, if you
> > compile
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:55:00PM -0400, dman wrote:
>
> Oh, old kernel and new NIC. I had only a rev2.0 NIC back when I was
> using kernels older than 2.2.19. My rev4.1 NIC has only been tried
> (and worked) with 2.2.19 and 2.4.8.
I'm building 2.2.19 for that router now. Cool, I'll try bu
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:11:46PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:03:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > I have a Linksys Etherfast 10/100, I think it's revision 3, though. All you
| > should need to do is enable the driver in the kernel, compile, then, if you
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:03:54PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:12:56PM -0400, dman wrote:
| > Interesting. I didn't even look at the disk that came with my new
| > card, but my old one had the then-current source on it. I never even
| > needed the latest source,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:03:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a Linksys Etherfast 10/100, I think it's revision 3, though. All you
> should need to do is enable the driver in the kernel, compile, then, if you
> compile it as a module (I compile it statically), you'll need to make mo
I have a Linksys Etherfast 10/100, I think it's revision 3, though. All you
should need to do is enable the driver in the kernel, compile, then, if you
compile it as a module (I compile it statically), you'll need to make modules
and make modules-install, and modprobe/insmod the module. Turn off
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:12:56PM -0400, dman wrote:
> Interesting. I didn't even look at the disk that came with my new
> card, but my old one had the then-current source on it. I never even
> needed the latest source, the version that came with whatever kernel I
> was running worked fine.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:27:27PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:07:44AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > In my ongoing effort to put a second NIC in my computer I have purchased a
| > new NIC, an EtherFast 10/100 version 5. However, Linux or my box doesn't
| > s
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:07:44AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In my ongoing effort to put a second NIC in my computer I have purchased a
> new NIC, an EtherFast 10/100 version 5. However, Linux or my box doesn't
> see the NIC enough to give it an IRQ number. Everything else seems in order
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:23:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, 28 August 2001, dman wrote:
| > On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:07:44AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > | In my ongoing effort to put a second NIC in my computer I have
| > | purchased a new NIC, an EtherFast 10/100 version
On Tue, 28 August 2001, dman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:07:44AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | In my ongoing effort to put a second NIC in my computer I have
> | purchased a new NIC, an EtherFast 10/100 version 5. However, Linux
> | or my box doesn't see the NIC enough to give it
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 10:52:21AM -0500, John Patton wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:07:44AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > In my ongoing effort to put a second NIC in my computer I have
| > purchased a new NIC, an EtherFast 10/100 version 5. However,
| > Linux or my box doesn't see the
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:07:44AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In my ongoing effort to put a second NIC in my computer I have purchased a
> new NIC, an EtherFast 10/100 version 5. However, Linux or my box doesn't see
> the NIC enough to give it an IRQ number. Everything else seems in orde
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:07:44AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| In my ongoing effort to put a second NIC in my computer I have
| purchased a new NIC, an EtherFast 10/100 version 5. However, Linux
| or my box doesn't see the NIC enough to give it an IRQ number.
| Everything else seems in order
In my ongoing effort to put a second NIC in my computer I have purchased a new
NIC, an EtherFast 10/100 version 5. However, Linux or my box doesn't see the
NIC enough to give it an IRQ number. Everything else seems in order when I
pull up cat /proc/pci, except there is no IRQ number... I'm tr
27 matches
Mail list logo
