When a package is not in Debian there is also the option of compiling
from source. Sometimes this is not practical, though (because it has too
many dependencies which are in turn hard to build).
--
Do not eat animals; respect them as you respect people.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=how+to+(become+OR
On Thu 31 Aug 2017 at 20:43:34 (+0200), rrbuer...@freenet.de wrote:
> My lilypond - experience and workaround-solution with debian stretch:
>
> I updated 2 PCs (precisely a pc and a laptop) at the beginning of July
> 2017 from a zero-errors-running Jessie to a (censored b
Hi,
rrbuer...@freenet.de wrote:
> lilypond is removed
> in Stretch "because" an unsolved Guile-"Problem".
Isn't this solved meanwhile ?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746005#278
30 Jan 2017
"a new Debian version of lilypond (2.18.2-7
My lilypond - experience and workaround-solution with debian stretch:
I updated 2 PCs (precisely a pc and a laptop) at the beginning of July
2017 from a zero-errors-running Jessie to a (censored by vice squad
;-) ) Stretch.
One of the knockouts was: I had overlooked, that lilypond is removed
in
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Curt wrote:
> dpkg --remove --force-remove-reinstreq lilypond-doc
>
*That* did the trick. Great
Thanks a lot, Curt.
Best regards,
Joao
On Sat 13 Sep 2014 at 15:50:33 +, Golden Chariot Charterers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tried suggestions on apt-get purge lilypond-doc. The following
> happened thereafter :
>
> root@debian:/home/glenn# apt-get purge lilypond-doc
> + apt-get purge lilypond-doc
> Readi
On 2014-09-13, Golden Chariot Charterers
wrote:
>
> Tried suggestions on apt-get purge lilypond-doc. The following happened
> thereafter :
>
> Do not know how to get rid of lilypond :-(
>
man dpkg says
PACKAGE FLAGS
reinst-required
A package marked reinst-requ
Hi,
Tried suggestions on apt-get purge lilypond-doc. The following happened
thereafter :
root@debian:/home/glenn# apt-get purge lilypond-doc
+ apt-get purge lilypond-doc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be
On Fri 12 Sep 2014 at 14:52:25 -0300, Joao Roscoe wrote:
> OK, it is a matter of time, then. Meanwhile, is there any workaround tha
> will allow me to keep updating my system?
Before upgrading:
apt-get purge lilypond-doc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debi
OK, it is a matter of time, then. Meanwhile, is there any workaround tha
will allow me to keep updating my system?
João
Em 12/09/2014 14:36, "Don Armstrong" escreveu:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Joao Roscoe wrote:
> > I tried updating my jessie system, and lilypond-doc upgrade
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Joao Roscoe wrote:
> I tried updating my jessie system, and lilypond-doc upgrade failed:
This is #758787 which is fixed in unstable, but the migration to testing
is currently blocked by #760794.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
I leave
Me too,
same prob as Joao Roscoe
I tried updating my jessie system, and lilypond-doc upgrade failed:
---
...
The following packages will be upgraded:
lilypond-doc
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 81 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/15.6 MB of archives. After unpacking 19.2 MB will be used.
Do
clear from this just what your installation media was, but
checking debian.org it ought to be on the media in most cases:
(from
http://cdimage-search.debian.org/?search_area=release&type=simple&query=lilypond)
lilypond_2.12.3-7_amd64.deb appears in:
debian-6.0.6-amd64-BD-1 (list.gz | jig
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:27:42 +0100, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
You answered the question.
I guess nobody answered your question. How should we help you, if you
don't post the error message?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
notation software program lilypond already included in
> > the
> > debian distribution?
> >
> > www.lilypond.org
> >
> > thanks.
> > Karen
> >
> >
> Hi, Karen,
>
> Yes, it is, under the package "lilypond". Try
olved in my install, so do not know what hat was
included.
I guess that question is for later, smiles.
Karen
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, William Ivanski wrote:
On 28-01-2013 22:37, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi folks,
Hope to keep the question simple.
is the music notation software program lilypond al
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:02:18 +0100, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
if I run that command and get an error
It's possible to copy output from a terminal too ;) and if it's not in
English, it's possible to temporarily switch to English or to translate
it. IOW, what error do you get?
Don't you have
22:37, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi folks,
Hope to keep the question simple.
is the music notation software program lilypond already included in the
debian distribution?
www.lilypond.org
thanks.
Karen
Hi, Karen,
Yes, it is, under the package "lilypond". Try:
aptitude instal
I am on the Wheezy release and I show it is in the main repository.
Shane
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Hope to keep the question simple.
> is the music notation software program lilypond already included in the
> debian distribution?
>
>
Karen writes:
> is the music notation software program lilypond already included in
> the debian distribution?
Yes.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
On 28-01-2013 22:37, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi folks,
Hope to keep the question simple.
is the music notation software program lilypond already included in
the debian distribution?
www.lilypond.org
thanks.
Karen
Hi, Karen,
Yes, it is, under the package "lilypond". Try:
> apt
Hi folks,
Hope to keep the question simple.
is the music notation software program lilypond already included in the
debian distribution?
www.lilypond.org
thanks.
Karen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:41:11 -0400
Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 03:26:41AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >
> > 4) The first rule of "In-Reply-To" headers is that you don't ever
> >include "In-Reply-To" headers.
> >
> So, what's the second rule of I
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 09:28 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 01 April 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > dfeuer wrote:
> > >> This comment is very late, but I thought I'd mention that LilyPond is
> > >> another program for engraving music. I don&
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 12:15:40 +0200
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Florian,
> > > So, what's the second rule of I-R-T headers?
> > Probably; "See Rule One".
> You figured it out, now we'll have to send the black helicopters to
> pick you up...
:-))
--
Regards _
/ )
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 09:21:00 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:41:11 -0400
> Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Roberto,
>
> > So, what's the second rule of I-R-T headers?
>
> Probably; "See Rule One".
You figured it out, now we'll have to send the blac
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:41:11 -0400
Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Roberto,
> So, what's the second rule of I-R-T headers?
Probably; "See Rule One".
:-)
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Doe
On Sunday 01 April 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dfeuer wrote:
> >> This comment is very late, but I thought I'd mention that LilyPond is
> >> another program for engraving music. I don't know how it compares to
> >> MusiXTeX (although
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 03:26:41AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> 4) The first rule of "In-Reply-To" headers is that you don't ever
>include "In-Reply-To" headers.
>
So, what's the second rule of I-R-T headers?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 16:32:11 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
> > dfeuer wrote:
> >> This comment is very late, but I thought I'd mention that LilyPond is
> >> another program for engraving music. I don't know how it compares to
> >>
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
> > dfeuer wrote:
> >> This comment is very late, but I thought I'd mention that LilyPond
> >> is another program for engraving music. I don't know how it
> >> compares to MusiXTeX (alth
Kent West wrote:
> dfeuer wrote:
>> This comment is very late, but I thought I'd mention that LilyPond is
>> another program for engraving music. I don't know how it compares to
>> MusiXTeX (although it apparently grew out of a MusiXTeX addon,
>> eventually l
dfeuer wrote:
This comment is very late, but I thought I'd mention that LilyPond is
another program for engraving music. I don't know how it compares to
MusiXTeX (although it apparently grew out of a MusiXTeX addon,
eventually leaving TeX), but it does produce good scores a
This comment is very late, but I thought I'd mention that LilyPond is another
program for engraving music. I don't know how it compares to MusiXTeX
(although it apparently grew out of a MusiXTeX addon, eventually leaving TeX),
but it does produce good scores and is well supporte
Bob McGowan wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
>> On Friday 16 February 2007,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I have not seen anyone in this thread suggest lilypond ?
>>
>> There are several GUI notation programs around opensource.
>
> Generally, I prefer denem
David Baron wrote:
On Friday 16 February 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not seen anyone in this thread suggest lilypond ?
I cannot pretend to be an expert, but its results for me so far are
really quite delightful. Documentation is very good. It does guitar
TABS and all that sort of
On Friday 16 February 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have not seen anyone in this thread suggest lilypond ?
>
> I cannot pretend to be an expert, but its results for me so far are
> really quite delightful. Documentation is very good. It does guitar
> TABS and all that sort of
debian wrote:
I have not seen anyone in this thread suggest lilypond ?
I cannot pretend to be an expert, but its results for me so far are
really quite delightful. Documentation is very good. It does guitar
TABS and all that sort of thing.
Joe Mc Cool
Ag! That is TOO easy!
This is
I have not seen anyone in this thread suggest lilypond ?
I cannot pretend to be an expert, but its results for me so far are
really quite delightful. Documentation is very good. It does guitar
TABS and all that sort of thing.
Joe Mc Cool
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
After a dist-upgrade (unstable) I get the following output from "lilypond -V"
GNU LilyPond 2.6.3
LILYPOND_DATADIR="/usr/share/lilypond/2.6.3"
LOCALEDIR="/usr/share/locale"
Effective prefix: "/usr/share/lilypond/2.6.3"
Initializing FontConfig...
error: ad
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:10:57AM +, Joseph Haig wrote:
> > I am badly stuck for lilypond v2.6 and I have hosed my denyhosts also
> > :-(
> >
>
> I don't know the answer to your question, but you could get Lilypond
> via lilypond's own page:
&g
a when package searching at debian.org will be back on
> air ?
>
> I am badly stuck for lilypond v2.6 and I have hosed my denyhosts also
> :-(
>
I don't know the answer to your question, but you could get Lilypond
via lilypond's own page:
<http://lilypond.org/web/ins
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:40:11PM +0100, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Hello
>
> icmp (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
> > is there packages.debian.org alternative anywhere ?
Have we any idea when package searching at debian.org will be back on air ?
I am badly stuck for
The latest Debian lilypond source package (2.6.3-9) is taking too long
to build. After over a day (24 hours!) the package is still building
on my Sempron 2800+ (64 bit version running as plain i386). This is
already more than twice as long as the time it takes the behemoth
Openoffice.org to build
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 11:31:26AM +0100, J?rg Johannes wrote:
> Colin Watson schrieb:
> >This kind of thing is always a bug. If a file moves from one package to
> >another, the destination package needs a versioned Replaces: against the
> >original package. If the file is simply shared, then eithe
sort it out. You can file a bug against multiple packages
using this kind of Package: line in a bug report:
Package: tetex-base,tetex-extra,lilypond
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Colin Watson schrieb:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 04:39:44PM +0100, J?rg Johannes wrote:
I had a similar problem. I think some files moved from one to the other
package, and apt wants to replace the old files from files out of the
"wrong" package. It should work if you remove lilypond
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 04:39:44PM +0100, J?rg Johannes wrote:
> I had a similar problem. I think some files moved from one to the other
> package, and apt wants to replace the old files from files out of the
> "wrong" package. It should work if you remove lilypond, then apt
I had a similar problem. I think some files moved from one to the other
package, and apt wants to replace the old files from files out of the
"wrong" package. It should work if you remove lilypond, then apt-get
upgrade and then reinstall lilypond after all the TeX stuff is done.
How
-base_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config', which is also in package lilypond
Preparing to replace tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202-3 (using
.../tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tetex-extra ...
dpkg: error proce
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:18:45 +0800, csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using a brute-force dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot on the lilypond
> source package results in a build failure. The last three lines of
> stdout show:
>
> bison -d parser.yy
> mv parser.yy.tab.h out/pars
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:36:43 -0800
David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:18:45PM +0800, csj wrote:
> > Using a brute-force dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot on the lilypond
> > source package results in a build failure. The last three lin
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:18:45PM +0800, csj wrote:
> Using a brute-force dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot on the lilypond
> source package results in a build failure. The last three lines of
> stdout show:
>
> bison -d parser.yy
> mv parser.yy.tab.h out/parser.hh
> make[
Using a brute-force dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot on the lilypond
source package results in a build failure. The last three lines of
stdout show:
bison -d parser.yy
mv parser.yy.tab.h out/parser.hh
make[2]: Leaving directory `/xa/build/debian/lilypond-1.4.9/lily'
make[1]: Leaving directory
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 06:36:41PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> (debian unstable, 2.4.3 kernel)
>
> I tried the example from info lilypond tutorial:
>
> \score {
> \notes { c'4 e' g' }
> }
>
> then ran command:
>
(debian unstable, 2.4.3 kernel)
I tried the example from info lilypond tutorial:
\score {
\notes { c'4 e' g' }
}
then ran command:
ly2dvi -P test.ly
and here's what I've got:
-
57 matches
Mail list logo
