On Wednesday 12 February 2020 12:23:26 kaye n wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 7:27 PM André Carezia
wrote:
> > Try:
> >
> > hdparm -t /dev/sda
>
> Just curious,
>
> After executing:
> sudo apt install hdparm
>
> Why -
> hdparm -t /dev/sda
> bash: hdparm: command not found
It was likely install
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 01:23:26AM +0800, kaye n wrote:
> Just curious,
>
> After executing:
> sudo apt install hdparm
>
> Why -
> hdparm -t /dev/sda
> bash: hdparm: command not found
sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 7:27 PM André Carezia wrote:
>
> Try:
>
> hdparm -t /dev/sda
>
Just curious,
After executing:
sudo apt install hdparm
Why -
hdparm -t /dev/sda
bash: hdparm: command not found
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 08:27:14 -0300
André Carezia wrote:
Hello André,
>hdparm -t /dev/sda
Reports;
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 216 MB in 3.02 seconds = 71.64 MB/sec
and for comparison
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 224 MB in 3.01 seconds = 74.51 MB/sec
Drives are Western
> Em 7 de fev de 2020, às 06:22, Brad Rogers escreveu:
>
> [...]
> Here, everything else loads faster than LO, all from the same drive. So,
> whilst I agree that drive technology/speed may well be a factor, it's
> almost certainly not all matters.
Try:
hdparm -t /dev/sda
--
André Carezia
Eng
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 10:28:59 +0800
kaye n wrote:
> *So, how long does it take to load the second time?*
> About 4 seconds.
>
> After doing this:
>
>
> *kaye@laptop:~$ sudo suroot@laptop:/home/kaye# sync && echo 3 >
> /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches*
> Yes, it opened slow again. Slow disk then? Shoul
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:25:28 -0800
Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hello Patrick,
>Well, a slow dual core CPU is certainly a problem with today's
>software.
And everything else you say about older tech, speed, etc. noted. Thus
far, the only real issue is the slow load of LO, first time. For the
sort of
*So, how long does it take to load the second time?*
About 4 seconds.
After doing this:
*kaye@laptop:~$ sudo suroot@laptop:/home/kaye# sync && echo 3 >
/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches*
Yes, it opened slow again. Slow disk then? Should I replace it soon?
*Drives? Presumably Patrick's fancy system u
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 20:02:57 +
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:45:43 -0800
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Hello Patrick,
>
> >On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:45:43 +
> >Brad Rogers wrote:
> >> I note that Patrick says his starts in 3 or 4 secs. I was going to
> >I use version 6.1.
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:45:43 -0800
Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hello Patrick,
>On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:45:43 +
>Brad Rogers wrote:
>> I note that Patrick says his starts in 3 or 4 secs. I was going to
>I use version 6.1. When I load via the "libreoffice" menu item, I get
>a window that lists all t
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 09:09:15 +
Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:45:43 +
> Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:17:09 +0800
> > kaye n wrote:
> >
> > Hello kaye,
> >
> > >I was just wondering if it takes about 35 seconds for your Debian
> > >system to
> >
> > At leas
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:45:43 +
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:17:09 +0800
> kaye n wrote:
>
> Hello kaye,
>
> >I was just wondering if it takes about 35 seconds for your Debian
> >system to
>
> At least. As you say, subsequent starts are much faster.
>
> I note that Patrick
On 2/6/20 8:27 PM, kaye n wrote:
> By the way, it only takes 35 seconds on the first execution. If I close
> libreoffice, and open i again, it's really not so slow.
FWIW, on my laptop with a similar configuration, it takes 6 seconds to
open LO initially.
i3-7130U CPU @ 2.70GHz
8Gb memory/ 2.2Gb
On 2020-02-07, kaye n wrote:
>
> I was just wondering if it takes about 35 seconds for your Debian system to
> open LibreOffice. Mine does. My Debian is:
>
Seems excessive.
(Here it's molasses too, but "only" 20 seconds.)
All I can think of to suggest is to try starting LO from the command
li
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 09:09:15 +
Joe wrote:
Hello Joe,
>Drives? Presumably Patrick's fancy system uses SSD, maybe the OP has
>real hard drives.
Here, everything else loads faster than LO, all from the same drive. So,
whilst I agree that drive technology/speed may well be a factor, it's
almost
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:45:43 +
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:17:09 +0800
> kaye n wrote:
>
> Hello kaye,
>
> >I was just wondering if it takes about 35 seconds for your Debian
> >system to
>
> At least. As you say, subsequent starts are much faster.
>
> I note that Patrick
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:17:09 +0800
kaye n wrote:
Hello kaye,
>I was just wondering if it takes about 35 seconds for your Debian
>system to
At least. As you say, subsequent starts are much faster.
I note that Patrick says his starts in 3 or 4 secs. I was going to
suggest that he's using the LO
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:27:49AM +0800, kaye n wrote:
> By the way, it only takes 35 seconds on the first execution. If I close
> libreoffice, and open i again, it's really not so slow.
> Thank you
Try, before you start LO the second time, flushing all caches and buffers
(as root):
sync && e
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:27:49 +0800
kaye n wrote:
> By the way, it only takes 35 seconds on the first execution. If I close
> libreoffice, and open i again, it's really not so slow.
> Thank you
So, how long does it take to load the second time?
B
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:17 AM kaye n wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:17:09 +0800
kaye n wrote:
> Hello Friends!
>
> I was just wondering if it takes about 35 seconds for your Debian system to
> open LibreOffice. Mine does. My Debian is:
No. Initially, after a reboot, so all RAM was cleared of
buffered apps, the LibreOffice "Start" panel
By the way, it only takes 35 seconds on the first execution. If I close
libreoffice, and open i again, it's really not so slow.
Thank you
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:17 AM kaye n wrote:
> Hello Friends!
>
> I was just wondering if it takes about 35 seconds for your Debian system
> to open LibreOf
Hello Friends!
I was just wondering if it takes about 35 seconds for your Debian system to
open LibreOffice. Mine does. My Debian is:
Kernel: 4.19.0-6-amd64 x86_64
bits: 64
Desktop: Xfce 4.12.4
Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
If it matters:
Memory: 5.69 GiB
used: 2.03 GiB
Dual Core: Int
22 matches
Mail list logo
