Re: Latest GnuCash .debs

2001-12-14 Thread Bill Wohler
Charles Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > gnucash 1.6.4 quite happily w/ sid. Plus, I've seen > here on the list that running unstable or stable is > the better way to go rather than testing. Someone Many months ago, that was definitely the case. Many packages leaked into testing with broken

Re: Latest GnuCash .debs

2001-12-13 Thread Brian Nelson
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 04:52:23PM -0800, Charles Baker wrote: > > | Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but fixes/improvements developed in > | unstable take two weeks to get into testing. Anything that is broken > | in unstable usually gets fixed very rapidly. I

Re: Latest GnuCash .debs

2001-12-13 Thread dman
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 04:52:23PM -0800, Charles Baker wrote: | Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but fixes/improvements developed in | unstable take two weeks to get into testing. Anything that is broken | in unstable usually gets fixed very rapidly. Yes, but also remember that (in theory at lea

Re: Latest GnuCash .debs

2001-12-13 Thread Charles Baker
--- Stan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found .debs of the latest GnuCash at > www.gnucash.org, but no discussion > of what version of Debian they are for. > > Any chance these will work on woody? > > -- > Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 843-745-3154

Latest GnuCash .debs

2001-12-13 Thread Stan Brown
I found .debs of the latest GnuCash at www.gnucash.org, but no discussion of what version of Debian they are for. Any chance these will work on woody? -- Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]843-745-3154 Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension