In your message of: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 08:45:41 +0800, you write:
>You have to patch the 2.2.17 kernel or you have to use 2.4 kernel.
Yes, I am using 2.4.0-test10.
--
Jeff Lessem.
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 03:58:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I thought this limit was removed in for glibc 2.2. I did a
> dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1024k count=3072 and it worked fine.
> Previously this blew up at 2GB. I am sure I am mistaken about some of
> this, which is causing
In your message of: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:39:01 +0100, you write:
>there's a hardcoded 2GB limit in libc. You've to patch libc
>and recompile yourself. My boss made that (for writing something
>like 70 GB files), but he's not here currently, so I cannot ask him.
I thought this limit was removed in f
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 01:22:17PM -0700, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> Now that woody is based on glibc2.2 I thought I would play with large
> file support. Perhaps this was a mistake, as I have managed to create
> a 3GB file, but I can't remove it. Any access to the file with the
> fileutils package (ls
Now that woody is based on glibc2.2 I thought I would play with large
file support. Perhaps this was a mistake, as I have managed to create
a 3GB file, but I can't remove it. Any access to the file with the
fileutils package (ls, rm, etc.) returns with "Value too large for
defined data type".
I
5 matches
Mail list logo
