Re: LVM vs 3TB disk

2011-11-07 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
green wrote: Pavlos Parissis wrote at 2011-11-07 14:15 -0600: Does anyone know why LVM doesn't see the whole space of a 3TB disk? It only sees 2.7TB, as you can see below. Is this because the manufacturers use powers of 1000 instead of 1024? 3*1000^4 / 1024^4 = ~2.73 Pretty good... Hugo

Re: LVM vs 3TB disk

2011-11-07 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On Monday 07 November 2011 21:24:08 green wrote: > Pavlos Parissis wrote at 2011-11-07 14:15 -0600: > > Does anyone know why LVM doesn't see the whole space of a 3TB disk? It > > only sees 2.7TB, as you can see below. > > Is this because the manufacturers use powers of 1000 instead of 1024? > > 3

Re: LVM vs 3TB disk

2011-11-07 Thread green
Pavlos Parissis wrote at 2011-11-07 14:15 -0600: > Does anyone know why LVM doesn't see the whole space of a 3TB disk? It only > sees > 2.7TB, as you can see below. Is this because the manufacturers use powers of 1000 instead of 1024? 3*1000^4 / 1024^4 = ~2.73 signature.asc Description: Digit

LVM vs 3TB disk

2011-11-07 Thread Pavlos Parissis
Hello all, Does anyone know why LVM doesn't see the whole space of a 3TB disk? It only sees 2.7TB, as you can see below. This is on Debian 6. root@axilleas:/# parted /dev/sdc print Model: ATA WDC WD30EZRX-00M (scsi) Disk /dev/sdc: 3001GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Tab