Clear, thanks :)
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:46:38AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:05:17PM +0200, Dark Victorian Spirit wrote:
> > I hope i can ask a question on top of this one,
> > what if i have a PV which is configured and in use for a while,
> > but i found out that i
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:05:17PM +0200, Dark Victorian Spirit wrote:
> I hope i can ask a question on top of this one,
> what if i have a PV which is configured and in use for a while,
> but i found out that i forgot to set the pertition type on LVM.
>
> Can i still change this without data loss
I hope i can ask a question on top of this one,
what if i have a PV which is configured and in use for a while,
but i found out that i forgot to set the pertition type on LVM.
Can i still change this without data loss or risk?
And if i don't will i face issues of another kind?
On Mon, Apr 20, 20
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:33:13 +0100
Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 09:26:54AM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
> > Is it possible to have two VGs on the same PV?
>
> I don't believe so. The VG is the mapping layer in the LVM stack. It
> maps the LVs to the PVs. If you were to share a PV
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 09:26:54AM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
> Is it possible to have two VGs on the same PV?
I don't believe so. The VG is the mapping layer in the LVM stack. It
maps the LVs to the PVs. If you were to share a PV between VGs, then
you'd need some way to tell the VGs which parts o
Is it possible to have two VGs on the same PV?
If so, how can I make a VG with lots of free space smaller? I'm
suspecting that the answer to my first question is "no", since this
doesn't seem possible from the man pages.
Petter
--
"I'm ionized"
"Are you sure?"
"I'm positive."
pgpkZgFpuk4rE.pg
>
> There should be none.
>
>Note, however, that /dev/mapper/ may contain non-LVM specials as
>well, such as cryptsetup(8) ones.
>
>My guess is that /dev/VG/LV may provide some sort of backwards
>compatibility, as LVM may have been implemented before Linux's
> yudi v writes:
> I created a LV and was going to use the following command to create a
> file system:
> mkfs.ext4 /dev/vg/lv
> someone suggested I use:
> mkfs.ext4 /dev/mapper/vg-lv
> What's the difference?
There should be none.
Note, however, that /dev/mapper/ m
Hi Yudi,
yudi v wrote:
I created a LV and was going to use the following command to create a
file system:
mkfs.ext4 /dev/vg/lv
someone suggested I use:
mkfs.ext4 /dev/mapper/vg-lv
What's the difference?
Perhaps nothing, provided it is mapped properly:
# ls -lart /dev/mapper/vg0-root /de
I created a LV and was going to use the following command to create a file
system:
mkfs.ext4 /dev/vg/lv
someone suggested I use:
mkfs.ext4 /dev/mapper/vg-lv
What's the difference?
--
Kind regards,
Yudi
In <4a50a818.8060...@ccf.auth.gr>, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
>Anyway, does it make
>any sense to partition a logical volume?
Not usually. Might be useful in some odd corner case
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Giorgos Pallas:
-> failed to create a file system
The ext3 file system creation in partition #1 of LVM VG vg1, LV rootFS
failed
-- snip
Is this supposed to happen? Did I do something wrong?
I had the same issue when using the AMD64 squeeze installer a few
Giorgos Pallas:
>
> -> failed to create a file system
> The ext3 file system creation in partition #1 of LVM VG vg1, LV rootFS
> failed
-- snip
> Is this supposed to happen? Did I do something wrong?
I had the same issue when using the AMD64 squeeze installer a few days
ago. I think it is a bug,
Giorgos Pallas wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> To me it looks like a bug, but I'd like to show it to the list before
> filing it as a bug.
>
> My goal is to install debian testing using encrypted LVM, but not using
> the entire disk: I want to keep a free partition for installing vista
> (for educational purp
Hi all!
To me it looks like a bug, but I'd like to show it to the list before
filing it as a bug.
My goal is to install debian testing using encrypted LVM, but not using
the entire disk: I want to keep a free partition for installing vista
(for educational purposes...).
So, the steps that creat
Giorgos> Hello to everybody! My laptop has a partition with Vista and
Giorgos> the rest of the disk is free space. I boot the debian
Giorgos> installer cd and the question is: can I somehow select the
Giorgos> 'lvm + encrypt' scheme while preserving the vista partition?
Giorgos> This 'use ent
Hello to everybody!
My laptop has a partition with Vista and the rest of the disk is free
space. I boot the debian installer cd and the question is:
can I somehow select the 'lvm + encrypt' scheme while preserving the
vista partition? This 'use entire disk' which goes along the encrypted
lvm trou
On Monday 14 August 2006 08:49, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1)
> > Before finally removing it, I would like to set up the disk that is
> > currently in /dev/hdc with a boot sector and filesystem, such that when
> > re-install it as /dev/hda it just boots
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1)
> Before finally removing it, I would like to set up the disk that is currently
> in /dev/hdc with a boot sector and filesystem, such that when re-install it
> as /dev/hda it just boots up the root filesystem in its first partition.
> Obviously I c
I have a debian sarge server with 3 ide drives. Apart from the root
filesystem on its own ext3 partition (hda1), the remainder of these disks use
lvm partitions. I use grub to manage the boot process.
I am about to try and upgrade with some new SATA disks, but from a case/power
consumption po
I managed to work out what was wrong! instead of using /dev/mapper/onboard--sata-static I should have used /dev/onboard-sata/static as soon as i made this simple change everything worked :) sorry for being such a newbieOn 9 Feb 2006, at 16:47, Gabe Granger wrote:Thanks for pointing me in the ri
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction, i did the followingresize_reiserfs -s-14G /dev/mapper/onboard--sata-static Which finished saying "resize_reiserfs: Resizing finished successfully."But when I then tried to resize the LV using lvreduce -L -14G /dev/mapper/onboard--sata-staticI get the f
I've just installed linux on a new machine and thought I'd give RAID
+ LVM a go :) I've now discovered that I've created them the wrong
sizes. I now need to shrink one and extend the other.
I want to shrink LV /dev/onboard-sata/static by 20GB then extend LV /
dev/onboard-sata/home by 20Gb.
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, stan wrote:
> I geuss at this point I don't have any serious problems with creating these
> links by hand, but I would appreciate soemone who has this workign telling
> me exactly what links ot make. I'm thinking that this needs to run _very_
> early in the startup sequence, ri
04 08:13:18 -0500
> > > > From: stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: A Newbie LVM Question
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:42:30PM -0500, stan wrote:
> > > > >
t; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: A Newbie LVM Question
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:42:30PM -0500, stan wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:37:06AM +0100, Erich Waelde wrote:
> > > > Content-Description: message body te
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 05:09:02PM +0200, Alexei Chetroi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 08:13:18AM -0500, stan wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:13:18 -0500
> > From: stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: A Newbie LVM Question
&g
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 08:13:18AM -0500, stan wrote:
> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:13:18 -0500
> From: stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: A Newbie LVM Question
>
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:42:30PM -0500, stan wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:42:30PM -0500, stan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:37:06AM +0100, Erich Waelde wrote:
> Content-Description: message body text
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've played with LVM on HP-UX, but only just enough to get a firm
> > > ha
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:37:06AM +0100, Erich Waelde wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
>
> Hi,
>
> stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've played with LVM on HP-UX, but only just enough to get a firm
> > handle on the fact that I don't understand the complexities of it,
> > and
Hi,
stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've played with LVM on HP-UX, but only just enough to get a firm
> handle on the fact that I don't understand the complexities of it,
> and that is easy to screw up, but hard to fix :-)
>
> So, I find myself building a Debian MytTV machine. In addition
>
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 07:22:24PM -0500, stan wrote:
> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:22:24 -0500
> From: stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: A Newbie LVM Question
>
> I've played with LVM on HP-UX, but only just enough to get a firm
> handle on the fact that I don't
I've played with LVM on HP-UX, but only just enough to get a firm
handle on the fact that I don't understand the complexities of it,
and that is easy to screw up, but hard to fix :-)
So, I find myself building a Debian MytTV machine. In addition
to the 40G root drive, I installed 2 other drives,
33 matches
Mail list logo
