Re: LVM devices and symlinks

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Davies
Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:29:23PM -0500, Neil T. Dantam wrote: >> At Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:15:54 +, >> Chris Davies wrote: >> > >> > Reboot the box after installing LVM. >> >> Ah, a reboot has lvcreate working properly, thank you. > This is good to know. However, this s

Re: LVM devices and symlinks

2012-12-13 Thread Chris Davies
Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:29:23PM -0500, Neil T. Dantam wrote: >> At Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:15:54 +, >> Chris Davies wrote: >> > >> > Reboot the box after installing LVM. >> >> Ah, a reboot has lvcreate working properly, thank you. > This is good to know. However, this s

Re: LVM devices and symlinks

2012-12-12 Thread Neil T . Dantam
At Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:54:41 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > > > > Reboot the box after installing LVM. > > > > Ah, a reboot has lvcreate working properly, thank you. > > This is good to know. However, this should all be triggered > when the package is initially installed. Agree that "turning

Re: LVM devices and symlinks

2012-12-12 Thread Neil T . Dantam
At Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:54:41 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > > > > Reboot the box after installing LVM. > > > > Ah, a reboot has lvcreate working properly, thank you. > > This is good to know. However, this should all be triggered > when the package is initially installed. Agree that "turning

Re: LVM devices and symlinks

2012-12-12 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:29:23PM -0500, Neil T. Dantam wrote: > At Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:15:54 +, > Chris Davies wrote: > > > > Reboot the box after installing LVM. > > Ah, a reboot has lvcreate working properly, thank you. This is good to know. However, this should all be triggered when th

Re: LVM devices and symlinks

2012-12-11 Thread Neil T . Dantam
At Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:15:54 +, Chris Davies wrote: > > Reboot the box after installing LVM. Ah, a reboot has lvcreate working properly, thank you. > Based on my empirical sample of two, there's some dependency that I > haven't tracked - and I must admit thought it was related to my weird >

Re: LVM devices and symlinks

2012-12-11 Thread Chris Davies
Neil T. Dantam wrote: > New (broken) Behavior > Performing an `lvcreate -L10G -nLVNAME VGNAME` creates: > 1. New device file /dev/mapper/VGNAME-LVNAME > (and apparently nothing else) > Then, lvcreate tries to open /dev/VGNAME-LVNAME, which fails because > of no symlink with: >/dev/VGNAME/LVN

Re: LVM devices and symlinks

2012-12-11 Thread Roger Leigh
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:09:50PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > Neil T. Dantam wrote: > > I'm having an issue (not quite a problem) creating LVM logical > > volumes. It seems that the way device files and symlinks are created > > has changed between Squeeze and Wheezy (or I have some bad > > configu

Re: LVM devices and symlinks

2012-12-10 Thread Bob Proulx
Neil T. Dantam wrote: > I'm having an issue (not quite a problem) creating LVM logical > volumes. It seems that the way device files and symlinks are created > has changed between Squeeze and Wheezy (or I have some bad > configuration). As far as I can tell these features have not changed between

LVM devices and symlinks

2012-12-10 Thread Neil T . Dantam
Hi, I'm having an issue (not quite a problem) creating LVM logical volumes. It seems that the way device files and symlinks are created has changed between Squeeze and Wheezy (or I have some bad configuration). Old (working) Behavior -- Performing an `lvcreate -L10G -nLV