On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:02:25PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 22:15, Daniel Webb wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 09:02:20PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
> > Well, yes, but supposing you *do* have a failure? Then what? Half the
> > filesystem is still there on the second disk, i
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 22:15, Daniel Webb wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 09:02:20PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
> Well, yes, but supposing you *do* have a failure? Then what? Half the
> filesystem is still there on the second disk, is it recoverable, and if not,
> why not?
You may get some of the d
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 09:02:20PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
> If you've got enough spindles, each physical volume is typically a RAID1
> or RAID5. Then you can add and remove physical volumes from
> your volume group as needed. A single disk failure is harmless.
>
> Other than adding and removin
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 20:20, Daniel Webb wrote:
> What happens when you have a 2-disk LVM volume group and disk 1 fails?
> Obviously this will depend on the filesystem you put on top of the volume,
> right? So which filesystems will recover gracefully if you chop them in half
> like that?
>
> It'
I've been Googling for the answer to this and failing, so:
What happens when you have a 2-disk LVM volume group and disk 1 fails?
Obviously this will depend on the filesystem you put on top of the volume,
right? So which filesystems will recover gracefully if you chop them in half
like that?
It'
5 matches
Mail list logo
