On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 02:21:54PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> On Thursday 17 May 2007 22:31, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> > raid1 mirrors two disks to create one volume. LVM will then divy up
> > that volume. So in the installer, set the disk/partition to use as
> > physical volume for s
On Thursday 17 May 2007 22:31, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:30:37PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 May 2007 22:52:13 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:29:10PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> > > &g
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:30:37PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 May 2007 22:52:13 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:29:10PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> > >
> > > I intend to install LVM and RAID-1 on a two disks system.
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 22:52:13 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:29:10PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I intend to install LVM and RAID-1 on a two disks system.
> > Is there any order or procedure to respect when installing bot
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:29:10PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I intend to install LVM and RAID-1 on a two disks system.
> Is there any order or procedure to respect when installing both together ?
> Some HOWTO or README somewhere about this ?
>
> Thanks for
Hello,
I intend to install LVM and RAID-1 on a two disks system.
Is there any order or procedure to respect when installing both together ?
Some HOWTO or README somewhere about this ?
Thanks for any info.
Bye,
Bruno
--
PGP key ID: 0x2e604d51
Key : http://www.costacurta.org/keys
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 08:30:38AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 06:03:44PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
>
> > This juggling to keep all the balls (disks) in the air sounds familiar.
> > Non-partisan caution: before you settle on Reiserfs, read some recent
> > threads about R
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 06:03:44PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:27:27AM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > Buried in this is a little bit of grumpiness, but only a little. See if you
> > can find it. Mainly, this is about a success that I thought was worth
> > sharing.
>
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 06:03:44PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
} On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:27:27AM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote:
} > Buried in this is a little bit of grumpiness, but only a little. See if you
} > can find it. Mainly, this is about a success that I thought was worth
} > sharing.
}
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:27:27AM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> Buried in this is a little bit of grumpiness, but only a little. See if you
> can find it. Mainly, this is about a success that I thought was worth
> sharing.
> In summary, I've been having success managing my home digital sto
Buried in this is a little bit of grumpiness, but only a little. See if you
can find it. Mainly, this is about a success that I thought was worth
sharing.
Starting in 1999 or so I had Debian running on a PowerCenter Pro 180 (PPC
604 180MHz, 1997 vintage Mac clone) maxed out to 512MB of memory. I r
also sprach Manfred Schuler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.17.2340 +0100]:
> In the boot sequence LVM is started before mdadm.
It should not be.
ls /etc/rcS.d/
[...]
S25mdadm-raid@
S26lvm@
[...]
> I'd like to report this as a bug, but I don't know if LVM is too early
> or mdadm is too late.
>
> C
Hi All,
I'm using software RAID to protect against media errors, and then LVM
built ontop of the md device to allow for maximum versatility.
In the boot sequence LVM is started before mdadm.
On one of my servers LVM detects a LVM-Superblock on one of the RAID
disks and claims this device as LV
Hi All,
I'm using software RAID to protect against media errors, and then LVM
built ontop of the md device to allow for maximum versatility.
In the boot sequence LVM is started before mdadm.
On one of my servers LVM detects a LVM-Superblock on one of the RAID
disks and claims this device as LV
14 matches
Mail list logo
