Re: LDAP madness! - FIXED (I think)

> Pete, > > Without the LDAP entry you're attempting to authenticate against it > is hard to say. I have gotten Samba to work with LDAP before; however, I > don't currently have it setup as I'm re-structuring my LAN servers at > the moment. Of interest in the LDAP entries is that Samba has it's

Re: LDAP madness! [u]

Without the LDAP entry you're attempting to authenticate against it is hard to say. I have gotten Samba to work with LDAP before; however, I don't currently have it setup as I'm re-structuring my LAN servers at the moment. Of interest in the LDAP entries is that Samba has it's own schema of att

Re: LDAP madness! [u]

Pete, Without the LDAP entry you're attempting to authenticate against it is hard to say. I have gotten Samba to work with LDAP before; however, I don't currently have it setup as I'm re-structuring my LAN servers at the moment. Of interest in the LDAP entries is that Samba has it's own schema

LDAP madness!

Hi all, LDAP! I have successfully managed to get a working LDAP installation for Unix clients, nss & pam logins work fine, even alongside the current NIS setup for testing purposes! I am now trying to get the samba integration working for the Windows machines on this networkwhat a royal