Re: Kudo's and Question

1997-07-23 Thread mike
On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, Jason Costomiris wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jul 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Currently I'm running kernel 2.0.6, and haven't noticed any major > > problems with it. I normally stick to the "If it 'ain't broke, don't fix > > it" rule, but I'm wondering if there are any re

Re: Kudo's and Question

1997-07-23 Thread Jason Costomiris
On Tue, 22 Jul 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Currently I'm running kernel 2.0.6, and haven't noticed any major > problems with it. I normally stick to the "If it 'ain't broke, don't fix > it" rule, but I'm wondering if there are any reasons to go to say a 2.0.30 > kernel. Occasionally so

Re: Kudo's and Question

1997-07-23 Thread George Bonser
> Currently I'm running kernel 2.0.6, and haven't noticed any major > problems with it. I normally stick to the "If it 'ain't broke, don't fix > it" rule, but I'm wondering if there are any reasons to go to say a 2.0.30 > kernel. Occasionally some TCP connections hang (mostly cfingerd) but

Kudo's and Question

1997-07-22 Thread mike
First of all I would like to thank the Debian development team on another fine job done. Yesterday I took my in-production mail/pop/RADIUS server for our entire ISP (300+users small but climbing :) and upgraded to Debian 1.3.1 The upgrade was as smooth as one could imagine with only one