Re: Known Compile problems with 2.4-test11

:: Josh McKinney writes: > I have seen the same post on debianplanet, and as far as I can tell this is > OLD news. I am sure we all heard about the RH7 > compiler gcc 2.96, it is unstable too, but does this mean that woody > now contains the same compiler? As far as I can tell, it > isn't. N

Re: Known Compile problems with 2.4-test11

I have seen the same post on debianplanet, and as far as I can tell this is OLD news. I am sure we all heard about the RH7 compiler gcc 2.96, it is unstable too, but does this mean that woody now contains the same compiler? As far as I can tell, it isn't. Also, it is rather annoying for someo

Re: Known Compile problems with 2.4-test11

Brian McGroarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 07:23:36PM +, Adam Langley wrote: >> The GCC in unstable miscompiles 2.4-test11 - you have been warned. > >Any pointers to particulars on this? As I understand it, gcc-2.95.2 fails to compile recent kernels for i386, i486, and

Re: Known Compile problems with 2.4-test11

On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 07:23:36PM +, Adam Langley wrote: > The GCC in unstable miscompiles 2.4-test11 - you have been warned. Any pointers to particulars on this?

Known Compile problems with 2.4-test11

The GCC in unstable miscompiles 2.4-test11 - you have been warned. AGL -- Whenever anyone says, "theoretically," they really mean, "not really." pgpNU4XmqK0Yd.pgp Description: PGP signature