On 17 Jun 2003 14:52:41 -0700
Jeremy Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what version of kernel-source are you using? I have 2.4.20-7 (from
> testing) and cannot compile with gcc3.3.
I haven't actually, but I was speaking of 2.4.20-8, which others have used
successfully with gcc3.3.
Here's an
what version of kernel-source are you using? I have 2.4.20-7 (from
testing) and cannot compile with gcc3.3.
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 13:11, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:49:44 -0700
> Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Gary Hennigan wrote:
> >
> > > I think, in gene
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 9:25am, Gary Hennigan wrote:
:"Patrick Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 1:42am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
[...]
:> :> Anyone know why this is not compiling?
:>
:> No, but I grabbed the 2.4.20 source and had all sorts of other problems.
:> I'm on
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:49:44 -0700
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gary Hennigan wrote:
>
> > I think, in general, it's best to stick with 2.95 compilers for the
> > kernel.
>
> This seems to be the common view of the kernel developers, but I've had
> no trouble building 2.4.20 and .2
I use the deb-packages. On Unstable: kernel-package (8.040), gcc(3.3-2),
kernel-source-2.4.20 (2.4.20-8). I also had problems before, which could
be solved by changing the Makefile back to gcc-2.95 (eg. it compiled),
but now, with the packages above, everything seems to be just fine.
Best wishe
Gary Hennigan wrote:
> I think, in general, it's best to stick with 2.95 compilers for the
> kernel.
This seems to be the common view of the kernel developers, but I've had
no trouble building 2.4.20 and .21 kernels using whatever gcc was
current in Debian unstable at the time (3.3 currently, and
"Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I think, in general, it's best to stick with 2.95 compilers for the
> kernel. There are exceptions, but the easiest route is to use gcc-2.95
> for compiling kernel source. You can do this by editing the
> kernel-source-2.4.20/Makefile and setting HOST
"Patrick Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 1:42am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
>
> : --- dhobner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> :> I did the following:
> :>
> :> apt-get install gcc
> :> apt-get install kernel-package
> :> apt-get install kernel-source.2.4.18
> :> apt-get in
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 1:42am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
: --- dhobner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
:> I did the following:
:>
:> apt-get install gcc
:> apt-get install kernel-package
:> apt-get install kernel-source.2.4.18
:> apt-get install libc6-dev
:> apt-get install tk8.3
:> apt-get install lib
--- dhobner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I did the following:
>
> apt-get install gcc
> apt-get install kernel-package
> apt-get install kernel-source.2.4.18
> apt-get install libc6-dev
> apt-get install tk8.3
> apt-get install libncurses5-dev
>
> tar -jxf kernel-source-2.4.18.tar.bz2
>
> m
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:30:53AM -0400, dhobner wrote:
> I did the following:
>
> apt-get install gcc
> apt-get install kernel-package
> apt-get install kernel-source.2.4.18
> apt-get install libc6-dev
> apt-get install tk8.3
> apt-get install libncurses5-dev
>
> tar -jxf kernel-source-2.4.18.t
I did the following:
apt-get install gcc
apt-get install kernel-package
apt-get install kernel-source.2.4.18
apt-get install libc6-dev
apt-get install tk8.3
apt-get install libncurses5-dev
tar -jxf kernel-source-2.4.18.tar.bz2
make-kpkg clean
make-kpkg --append-to-version=.030320 kernel_image
12 matches
Mail list logo
