On 2024-07-31 16:00, Celejar wrote:
Update: FWIW, Debian Developer Ben Hutchings actually assigned this
issue a "grave" severity, and it was ultimately moved to the
initramfs-tools package. It's now fixed:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076561
Well done! Thank you for helpin
Ash Joubert wrote:
> On 2024-07-20 03:39, Celejar wrote:
>
> Thanks much!
>
> [...]
>
> As per another message in this thread, I've already filed a bug against
> linux-image-6.9.9-amd64, but I suppose I should update the report with
> this information, indicating that it's not r
On Sat 20 Jul 2024 at 12:13:28 (+1200), Ash Joubert wrote:
> On 2024-07-20 03:39, Celejar wrote:
> > Thanks much!
> [...]
> > As per another message in this thread, I've already filed a bug against
> > linux-image-6.9.9-amd64, but I suppose I should update the report with
> > this information, indi
On 2024-07-20 03:39, Celejar wrote:
Thanks much!
[...]
As per another message in this thread, I've already filed a bug against
linux-image-6.9.9-amd64, but I suppose I should update the report with
this information, indicating that it's not really a problem with that
package.
You are welcome!
Ash Joubert wrote:
> On 2024-07-19 02:32, Celejar wrote:
>
> I'm currently on kernel 6.9.8 (amd64 / Sid). Installing 6.9.9 fails due to
> running out of space on /boot:
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.9.9-amd64
> zstd: error 70 : Write error : cannot write block
Le 19/07/2024 à 05:12, songbird a écrit :
The Wanderer wrote:
...
By taking on yourself the risk and burden of running sid, you are
volunteering to be one of those who helps notice issues before they
reach testing, and report those issues so that the machinery of the
archive can stop the package
Le 19/07/2024 à 09:25, didier gaumet a écrit :
[...]
You are perfectly right: there is no contract and one i free to use
which Debian distro one wants to...
[...]
typo error, sorry:
You are perfectly right: there is no contract and one is free to use
which Debian distro one wants to...
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 10:07:14AM +0200, didier gaumet wrote:
[...]
> > One of the things I love Debian for.
> >
> > Cheers
>
> My bad, I do know the existence of the Debian social contract but have not
> worded accurately enough what I wanted to say. I should have written
> something like:
N
Le 19/07/2024 à 09:43, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 09:25:22AM +0200, didier gaumet wrote:
Le 19/07/2024 à 05:12, songbird a écrit :
[...]
You are perfectly right: there is no contract and one i free to use which
Debian distro one wants to...
Actually, there /is/ a co
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 09:25:22AM +0200, didier gaumet wrote:
> Le 19/07/2024 à 05:12, songbird a écrit :
[...]
> You are perfectly right: there is no contract and one i free to use which
> Debian distro one wants to...
Actually, there /is/ a contract:
https://www.debian.org/social_contract
The Wanderer wrote:
...
> By taking on yourself the risk and burden of running sid, you are
> volunteering to be one of those who helps notice issues before they
> reach testing, and report those issues so that the machinery of the
> archive can stop the package versions which those issues from mig
On 2024-07-19 02:32, Celejar wrote:
I'm currently on kernel 6.9.8 (amd64 / Sid). Installing 6.9.9 fails due to
running out of space on /boot:
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.9.9-amd64
zstd: error 70 : Write error : cannot write block : No space left on device
E: mkinitramfs failur
On 2024-07-18 at 10:32, Celejar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently on kernel 6.9.8 (amd64 / Sid). Installing 6.9.9 fails due to
> running out of space on /boot:
>
> *
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.9.9-amd64
> zstd: error 70 : Write error : cannot write block : No space lef
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2024-07-18 at 13:50, Celejar wrote:
>
> > Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> >> This is not the place for debugging Sid, I'm afraid, there are too
> >> few
> >
> > It's not? Where, then, is the place for debugging Sid?
>
> I'm no longer anything *close* to an expert in this
On 18 Jul 2024 13:47 -0400, from cele...@gmail.com (Celejar):
>> I don't mean this to be snarky, but that desire seems incompatible
>> with running Debian sid. I honestly think it's an unreasonable
>> expectation to want official guides for every transitory broken
>> state in a development tree.
>
On 2024-07-18 at 13:50, Celejar wrote:
> Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>> This is not the place for debugging Sid, I'm afraid, there are too
>> few
>
> It's not? Where, then, is the place for debugging Sid?
I'm no longer anything *close* to an expert in this area (having not run
sid myself in well o
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 13:50:21 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> Really? I had the impression that lots of list subscribers / readers
> run Sid. Are there statistics on this?
Nah, sid users are just louder, on average. Stable users don't have
as much to talk about, because our stuff just works. ;-)
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 03:42:30PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 11:35:15AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > I'd rather not mess around with stuff I don't really understand
> > > without an official guide to the process.
> >
> > I don't me
Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 11:35:15AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > I'd rather not mess around with stuff I don't really understand
> > without an official guide to the process.
>
> I don't mean this to be snarky, but that desire seems incompatible
> with running Debian sid.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 03:42:30PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 11:35:15AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > I'd rather not mess around with stuff I don't really understand
> > without an official guide to the process.
>
> I don't mean this to be snarky, but that desire seem
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 11:35:15AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> I'd rather not mess around with stuff I don't really understand
> without an official guide to the process.
I don't mean this to be snarky, but that desire seems incompatible
with running Debian sid. I honestly think it's an unreasona
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm currently on kernel 6.9.8 (amd64 / Sid). Installing 6.9.9 fails due to
> > running out of space on /boot:
>
> ...
>
> > I'm not sure why I'm hitting this now - did Debian just change
> > something? Is anyone else hitting this? Is this
Celejar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently on kernel 6.9.8 (amd64 / Sid). Installing 6.9.9 fails due to
> running out of space on /boot:
...
> I'm not sure why I'm hitting this now - did Debian just change
> something? Is anyone else hitting this? Is this documented somewhere?
> Is there a str
Hello,
I'm currently on kernel 6.9.8 (amd64 / Sid). Installing 6.9.9 fails due to
running out of space on /boot:
*
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.9.9-amd64
zstd: error 70 : Write error : cannot write block : No space left on device
E: mkinitramfs failure zstd -q -9 -T0 70
upd
24 matches
Mail list logo
