Re: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% User zos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: uz> Hah. That's really funny. I didn't even think of that. I dunno, if uz> I need a file system supported I just compile it straight into the uz> kernel. While I realize the benefits of having loadable modules uz> for various things, it doesn't make

Re: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread User zos
> I think you miss the point Andon was trying to make: > > You _can_ select whichever filesystem type you want for your root > partition (AFAIK). > > The rule is that whatever filesystem type you select for your root > partition _must_ be built into the kernel. It can't be a loadable > module.

Re: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% User zos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: uz> IIRC in all the kernels I've compiled from 2.2.x and on you could uz> always select ext2fs support or not. This makes sense as linux is uz> just a kernel and should not be dependent on any particular file uz> system, especially now with the adven

Re: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread olgnuby
Victor wrote: > Here it is my lilo.conf > > # > lba32 > boot=/dev/hda > root=/dev/hda2 > install=/boot/boot.b > map=/boot/map > # > delay=20 > vga=normal > # > default=linux > > image=/lin-2.2# kernel 2.2.19 > label=linux > read-only > > image=/lin-2.4# kernel 2.

Re: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread User zos
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Victor wrote: > > > NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for linux NET4.0 > > > request_module[block-major-3]: Root fs not mounted > > > VFS: Cannot open root devic "302" or 03:02 > > > Please append a correct "root=" boot option > > > Kernel panic:VFS:Unable to mount root fs 03:

Re: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread User zos
you're using). > > - Andon > - Original Message - > From: "Victor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "debian-user" > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:35 PM > Subject: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems > > > > After extreme deliberation (

Re: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread Victor
olgnuby [debian-user] <10/07/01 10:52 -0500>: > Victor wrote: > > > > After extreme deliberation (see my previous thread) I've installed bot > > the kernel-image-2.4.5 and the kernel-source & headers 2.4.5 from the > > Bunk's stuff. > > > > The standard kernel 2.4.5 from kernel-image is working g

Re: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread Andon M. Coleman
- From: "Victor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "debian-user" Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:35 PM Subject: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems > After extreme deliberation (see my previous thread) I've installed bot > the kernel-image-2.4.5 and the kernel-source & header

Re: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread olgnuby
Victor wrote: > > After extreme deliberation (see my previous thread) I've installed bot > the kernel-image-2.4.5 and the kernel-source & headers 2.4.5 from the > Bunk's stuff. > > The standard kernel 2.4.5 from kernel-image is working great, whilst > after compiling my tailored kernel 2.4.5 (whi

Re: Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread ray p
Config files can not be brought forward across major kernel versions. Use the config file that came with the image as a starting point or the example config on http://www.markybob.com is a decent starting point. On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 05:35:24PM +, Victor wrote: > After extreme deliberatio

Kernel 2.4.5 at last! Problems

2001-07-10 Thread Victor
After extreme deliberation (see my previous thread) I've installed bot the kernel-image-2.4.5 and the kernel-source & headers 2.4.5 from the Bunk's stuff. The standard kernel 2.4.5 from kernel-image is working great, whilst after compiling my tailored kernel 2.4.5 (which I obtained using the confi