Re: Kernel-WhyTo

1998-08-18 Thread Raymond A. Ingles
On Sun, 16 Aug 1998, Matthew Myers wrote: > I am curious about why there are 9 Million different kernels. I was > examining the 2.1 kernels and they number all the way up to .115. What is > the point of this? If .95 is obviously an improved and better version than > .94, why are people still tr

Re: Kernel-WhyTo

1998-08-18 Thread Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corcete Dutra
Matthew Myers wrote: > > I am curious about why there are 9 Million different kernels. I was > examining the 2.1 kernels and they number all the way up to .115. What is > the point of this? If .95 is obviously an improved and better version than > .94, why are people still trying to work bugs o

Kernel-WhyTo

1998-08-17 Thread Matthew Myers
I am curious about why there are 9 Million different kernels. I was examining the 2.1 kernels and they number all the way up to .115. What is the point of this? If .95 is obviously an improved and better version than .94, why are people still trying to work bugs our of .95? Why not go on to the