On Thursday 05 November 2015 10:13:34 The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2015-11-05 at 09:59, David Baron wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 November 2015 09:47:12 The Wanderer wrote:
> >> On 2015-11-05 at 09:41, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 05 November 2015 14:26:07 David Baron wrote:
> Attempt to apt-ge
On 2015-11-05 at 09:59, David Baron wrote:
> On Thursday 05 November 2015 09:47:12 The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2015-11-05 at 09:41, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday 05 November 2015 14:26:07 David Baron wrote:
>>>
Attempt to apt-get --reinstall install base-files will produce
erro
On Thursday 05 November 2015 09:47:12 The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2015-11-05 at 09:41, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 November 2015 14:26:07 David Baron wrote:
> >> Attempt to apt-get --reinstall install base-files will produce
> >> error "cannot be downloaded." In Synaptic, the Debian symbol do
On 2015-11-05 at 09:41, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 05 November 2015 14:26:07 David Baron wrote:
>
>> Attempt to apt-get --reinstall install base-files will produce
>> error "cannot be downloaded." In Synaptic, the Debian symbol does
>> not appear with the package. Maybe it is only on stable?
On Thursday 05 November 2015 14:26:07 David Baron wrote:
[snip]
> Attempt to apt-get --reinstall install base-files will produce error
> "cannot be downloaded." In Synaptic, the Debian symbol does not appear with
> the package. Maybe it is only on stable?
https://packages.debian.org/search?keyword
On Thursday 05 November 2015 08:47:48 The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2015-11-05 at 03:22, David Baron wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 November 2015 16:35:57 David Wright wrote:
> >> On Wed 04 Nov 2015 at 22:56:42 (+0200), David Baron wrote:
> >>> So, I easily edited the text in /etc/issue to something more to
On 2015-11-05 at 03:22, David Baron wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 November 2015 16:35:57 David Wright wrote:
>
>> On Wed 04 Nov 2015 at 22:56:42 (+0200), David Baron wrote:
>>
>>> So, I easily edited the text in /etc/issue to something more to
>>> my liking. This is just text, no meaning.
>>>
>>> Wa
On Thursday 05 November 2015 09:41:40 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Baron wrote:
> > what should it be for Debian Sid?
>
> On my Sid VM i get:
>
> $ cat /etc/os-release
> PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux stretch/sid"
> NAME="Debian GNU/Linux"
> ID=debian
> HOME_URL="https://www.de
Hi,
David Baron wrote:
> what should it be for Debian Sid?
On my Sid VM i get:
$ cat /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux stretch/sid"
NAME="Debian GNU/Linux"
ID=debian
HOME_URL="https://www.debian.org/";
SUPPORT_URL="https://www.debian.org/support/";
BUG_REPORT_URL="http
On Wednesday 04 November 2015 16:35:57 David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 04 Nov 2015 at 22:56:42 (+0200), David Baron wrote:
> > So, I easily edited the text in /etc/issue to something more to my liking.
> > This is just text, no meaning.
> >
> > Watching a cmake session, I noticed the distribution bei
On Wed 04 Nov 2015 at 22:56:42 (+0200), David Baron wrote:
> So, I easily edited the text in /etc/issue to something more to my liking.
> This is just text, no meaning.
>
> Watching a cmake session, I noticed the distribution being called, you
> guessed
> it: Kali ...
>
> Found another file: ~
So, I easily edited the text in /etc/issue to something more to my liking.
This is just text, no meaning.
Watching a cmake session, I noticed the distribution being called, you guessed
it: Kali ...
Found another file: ~$ cat /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Kali GNU/Linux 2.0 (sana)"
NAME="Kali GN
12 matches
Mail list logo