This list moves so fast I don't remember if this has been posted, here it is
anyway:
KDE3 and Debian : Frequently Asked Questions
http://davidpashley.com/debian-kde/faq.html
" Any packages which you download that are not from the official distribution
may result in you being unable to upgrade t
I'm having a few problems with installing a few kde apps.
Will it be ok in this case to 'force' installation of these or is there a
better solution.
Mike
Excuse any line wrapping errors.
(& posting from MS - playing B&W)
--
left:~# apt-get upgrade
Building Dependency Tree... Done 8 p
Hi there,
I have installed latest KDE debs and after that netscape won't bold out
my unread messages any more. All messages do look like they are already
read now.
So where is the bug now, in KDE or in netscape ?
Anybody got a similar problem ?
TIA
Michael Meding
System is debian 2.2
Danny Pansters wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The kde.tdyc.com Woody tree for kde2 has been emptied, I'm sure
> of it because I used to apt kde2 from there.
I don't know why the packages have been cleared out. Ask Ivan E. Moore II.
> Anyway, I hope that the kde2 debs will be added to the normal de
Hi everyone,
The kde.tdyc.com Woody tree for kde2 has been emptied, I'm sure of it because I
used to apt kde2 from there. I happened to have been reinstalling my Woody box
from scratch yesterday (the 6th), starting from a couple of potato disks. All
went well, but when it came to installing kde2 b
r the most
part
> closed for
> Debian users. I have tried to get some indication about what to do to compile
> the binaries from source, but
> I haven't been able to find any valuable information. Does anyone have any
idea?
>
> Thanks,
> Antonio.
There are KDE debs at http://kde.t
Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> That URL doesn't work. There is probably some little mistake in the URL, I
> used the
> one you mean, and I got a bunch of broken links, etc.
> You mean
> http://kde.tdyc.com/ , but again, didn't work good.
http://kde.tdyc.com/Debian/ should have answers for you.
--
Mi
That URL doesn't work. There is probably some little mistake in the URL, I used
the
one you mean, and I got a bunch of broken links, etc.
You mean
http://kde.tdyc.com/ , but again, didn't work good.
"John L . Fjellstad" wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:57:42PM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:57:42PM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> I haven't been able to find any valuable information. Does anyone have any
> idea?
what about ftp://kde.kdyc.com/pub/kde?
--
John__
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ez wrote:
> > Does any one know if the collection of kde debs is complete? Last time I
> > tried to download it it gave me a bunch of broken-missing links and
> > files. So I just stopped trying. May be the reason is that the packager
> > (Ivan, I believe) has decided to wai
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:10:04PM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Does any one know if the collection of kde debs is complete? Last time I
> tried to download it it gave me a bunch of broken-missing links and
> files. So I just stopped trying. May be the reason is that the packager
&
Does any one know if the collection of kde debs is complete? Last time I
tried to download it it gave me a bunch of broken-missing links and
files. So I just stopped trying. May be the reason is that the packager
(Ivan, I believe) has decided to wait for the QT GPL-ing, to get all
done in one
I've downloaded kde packages and would like to transfer
them to another box to try installing them there. I can
use only 1.44 floppies. So far I've not been able to
copy the smaller files successfully - the problem shows
itself when trying to mount the floppy after apparently
copying the files ther
Hi,
there is a partial mirror (only i386 debs) of
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com/debian/ at
ftp://ftp.uni-marburg.de/mirror/debian-snowcrash.tdyc.com .
It contains mainly kde packages.
/etc/apt/sources.list:
deb ftp://ftp.uni-marburg.de/mirror/debian-snowcrash.tdyc.com slink rkrusty
or
deb ftp://f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Curious about something...
>
> I didn't know there was a qt-1.42.deb available, so yesterday I downloaded the
> qt source and compiled my own. I have libc6.2.0.7t - do I need to upgrade to
> a new version to get th
In a message dated 2/5/99 6:08:11 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Sorry Noah, but the potato qt1g_1.42-1.deb depends on libc6 (>= 2.0.7u),
> which is not standard on a Hamm System. You've got at least to use a
> Slink-System (which is not available on CD, so let
In a message dated 2/5/99 6:05:58 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >>
> >> Will they run on hamm systems?
> >>
>
> Noah> The only dependency that isn't satisfied by hamm is the Qt package.
> You
> Noah> need Qt 1.42 from potato. That Qt package will install on a ham
> On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:49:00 -0500 (EST), "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Noah> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Noah> On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Will they run on hamm systems?
>>
Noah> The only dependency that isn't satisfied by hamm is the Q
Not live, per se, just Marshmallows :)
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I'm sure we're all waiting with
> > baited breath...
>
> Why, have we all been eating live
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Do you need to install them in any particular order?
>
kdelibs, kdesupport, kdebase, everything else. The dependecies are set up
correctly, so dpkg will tell you if you need to install one of the other
packag
In a message dated 2/2/99 11:03:06 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> You don't. There's no Packages file on the ftp site, so you can't use apt
> or dselect. You need to manually download all the .deb using your
> favorite ftp client and install them with dpkg.
>
> noah
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
> How I put this line of KDE in source.list to apt read them?
> Reggards, Paulo Henrique
You don't. There's no Packages file on the ftp site, so you can't use apt
or dsel
mmm, live bait...
-Original Message-
From: Jens B. Jorgensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: KDE debs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I
How I put this line of KDE in source.list to apt read them?
Reggards, Paulo Henrique
Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Anyone got the KDE debs
In a message dated 2/2/99 10:49:13 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> The only dependency that isn't satisfied by hamm is the Qt package. You
> need Qt 1.42 from potato. That Qt package will install on a hamm system,
> though, so you don't need to try upgrading your whole sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Will they run on hamm systems?
>
The only dependency that isn't satisfied by hamm is the Qt package. You
need Qt 1.42 from potato. That Qt package will install on a hamm system,
though, so you don't need to tr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I'm sure we're all waiting with
> baited breath...
Why, have we all been eating live bait?
--
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 2/2/99 10:39:00 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> > Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I'm sure we're all waiting
> with
> > baited breath...
>
> They're available on all the KDE ftp mirrors.
> /pub/kde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I'm sure we're all waiting with
> baited breath...
They're available on all the KDE ftp mirrors.
/pub/kde/stable/1.1pre2/distribution/deb/potato/
n
Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I'm sure we're all waiting with
baited breath...
-Jay
le anywhere - ftp.kde.org appears to have
> > some libc5 binaries available in contrib, but nothing for glibc6 - the
> > directory appears to have been cleared.
> >
> > I know about the recent decision by Debian not to distribute KDE debs,
> > but surely there are some
es available in contrib, but nothing for glibc6 - the
> directory appears to have been cleared.
>
> I know about the recent decision by Debian not to distribute KDE debs,
> but surely there are some debs somewhere?
>
> Tanks,
>
KDE is available in the Debian 2.0 (hamm) distri
to have been cleared.
I know about the recent decision by Debian not to distribute KDE debs,
but surely there are some debs somewhere?
Tanks,
--
Phillip Deackes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Linux v.2.0
33 matches
Mail list logo
