Re: [OT] Steganography [WAS] Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-25 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 06:10:34PM -0600, Mark Allums wrote: > Celejar wrote: > >On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:45:28 -0600 > >Mark Allums <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Feasibility-wise, it's really anybody's guess whether information can > remain hidden. I see no reason to use steganographic techniques

Re: [OT] Steganography [WAS] Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Mark Allums
Celejar wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:45:28 -0600 Mark Allums <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: detect [steganography] use and possibly even recover the hidden information, but why is the concept inherently useless? Not totally or inherently useless, but not very practical. You would still need encry

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 06:39:28PM +0100, Manuel Gomez wrote: > Thank you for the responses, the document is openoffice (.odb), and i > usually use SFX compiler for Windows, but the result doesn't works in > Linux. > > I only need that the document can be readable and writable, only this. > > Tha

Re: [OT] Steganography [WAS] Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:45:28 -0600 Mark Allums <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Celejar wrote: > > Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There are even tools such as steghide for those who want to do things > >> as useless as hiding information inside an image. > > > > I'm curious; why is tha

Re: [OT] Steganography [WAS] Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Mark Allums
Celejar wrote: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There are even tools such as steghide for those who want to do things as useless as hiding information inside an image. I'm curious; why is that necessarily useless? I now that many steganography methods are broken, in the sense that the

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Mark Allums
Douglas A. Tutty wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 04:35:56PM +0100, Manuel Gomez wrote: El lun, 24-11-2008 a las 09:32 -0600, Ron Johnson escribi??: On 11/24/08 09:25, Manuel Gomez wrote: I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with another archive, and i want can open

[OT] Steganography [WAS] Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:17:07 + Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > There are even tools such as steghide for those who want to do things > as useless as hiding information inside an image. I'm curious; why is that necessarily useless? I now that many steganography methods are bro

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Manuel Gomez
Thank you for the responses, the document is openoffice (.odb), and i usually use SFX compiler for Windows, but the result doesn't works in Linux. I only need that the document can be readable and writable, only this. Thank you very much. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 04:25:12PM +0100, Manuel Gomez wrote: > I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with > another archive, and i want can open the document without problems. What type of document? What type of archive? > > I am not creating a trojan or so

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Sven Aluoor
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:25:12 +0100 Manuel Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with > another archive, and i want can open the document without problems. I am glad that such kind of attacks doesn't (yet) ex

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Sven Aluoor
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:25:12 +0100 Manuel Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with > another archive, and i want can open the document without problems. Hi Manuel What tools you are using on Windows for that purpose?

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manuel Gomez wrote: > > > No comments, if you don't want help, is very simple, please, don't post. > And PLEASE, the respect to the others is essential. If you want someone else to help you, *you* should respect the others. Please follow li

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
0600, Ron Johnson escribi??: > > > > On 11/24/08 09:25, Manuel Gomez wrote: > > > > > I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with > > > > > another archive, and i want can open the document without problems. > > > > > >

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Jeff Soules
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 04:35:56PM +0100, Manuel Gomez wrote: >> >> > El lun, 24-11-2008 a las 09:32 -0600, Ron Johnson escribi??: >> > > On 11/24/08 09:25, Manuel Gomez wrote: >> > > > I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with &g

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/24/08 10:30, Manuel Gomez wrote: No comments, if you don't want help, is very simple, please, don't post. And PLEASE, the respect to the others is essential. [snip] Don't top post. You asked a question, were given an answer in a thread you didn't like, you started a new threa

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Manuel Gomez
lun, 24-11-2008 a las 09:32 -0600, Ron Johnson escribi??: > > > On 11/24/08 09:25, Manuel Gomez wrote: > > > > I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with > > > > another archive, and i want can open the document without problems. > >

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 04:35:56PM +0100, Manuel Gomez wrote: > El lun, 24-11-2008 a las 09:32 -0600, Ron Johnson escribi??: > > On 11/24/08 09:25, Manuel Gomez wrote: > > > I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with > > > another archive, and i

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/24/08 09:37, Manuel Gomez wrote: This method is not plausible, so i am searching a joiner for linux. We can't help it if you deny reality. Sorry for the double posting. El lun, 24-11-2008 a las 13:29 -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI escribió: Manuel Gomez escreveu: I am search

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Manuel Gomez escreveu: > This method is not plausible, so i am searching a joiner for linux. > No matter what the method you use, it will need to resort to adding extra bytes to the end of the file. (Or the beginning, or the middle, but that does not make much difference.) The only way t

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Manuel Gomez
This method is not plausible, so i am searching a joiner for linux. Sorry for the double posting. El lun, 24-11-2008 a las 13:29 -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI escribió: > Manuel Gomez escreveu: > > I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with > > another arch

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Manuel Gomez
Again... I need this type of protection, and though you say is usseless, i am not going to change my opinion. Thank you very much. El lun, 24-11-2008 a las 09:32 -0600, Ron Johnson escribió: > On 11/24/08 09:25, Manuel Gomez wrote: > > I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need t

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/24/08 09:25, Manuel Gomez wrote: I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with another archive, and i want can open the document without problems. I am not creating a trojan or something, its for add size to specific documents (security-> If the document have 5 kbs

Re: Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Manuel Gomez escreveu: > I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with > another archive, and i want can open the document without problems. > > I am not creating a trojan or something, its for add size to specific > documents (security-> If the document hav

Joiner for Linux

2008-11-24 Thread Manuel Gomez
I am searching a joiner for Linux. I need to join an document with another archive, and i want can open the document without problems. I am not creating a trojan or something, its for add size to specific documents (security-> If the document have 5 kbs it takes 5 sec download it, but if