Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick.

2010-06-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/07/2010 07:44 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: [snip] Sadly, it's not a success report. I failed to create a .fodt file. The openoffice I'm using reports itself as: ooo-build 3.2.0.10, Debian 1:3.2.0-9 Sun May 2 18:53:43 UTC 2010 I start OpenOffice writer from the many my window manager provides.

Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick.

2010-06-07 Thread Mark Allums
On 6/7/2010 7:44 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: Since several people have had success with version 3.2, I suppose I should try it again, just to make sure I'm really talking about the right version. It's [possible I misremember a detail of what I didn, or that somehow I was still getting the old versi

Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick.

2010-06-07 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:44:32 +, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:09:36 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> On 06/06/2010 03:13 PM, hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:08:55PM +00

Processes still using old versions after upgrade [was: Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick]

2010-06-06 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Lu, 07 iun 10, 00:44:32, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > I know at one time with the older version, when I couldn't get it to come > up after the crash, I found a process called something like soffice-bin > was still hanging around. I killed it and OpenOffice (which I had > previously started from

Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick. Was: Looking for a .fodt validator

2010-06-06 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:09:36 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 06/06/2010 03:13 PM, hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:08:55PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote: I wrote a page with a footer containi

Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick. Was: Looking for a .fodt validator

2010-06-06 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/06/2010 03:13 PM, hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:08:55PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote: I wrote a page with a footer containing a page number. I had no trouble saving it as an .odt file, but OpenOf

Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick. Was: Looking for a .fodt validator

2010-06-06 Thread hendrik
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:08:55PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > I wrote a page with a footer containing a page number. I had no trouble > > saving it as an .odt file, but OpenOffice 3.0 crashed when I tried to > > Real

Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick. Was: Looking for a .fodt validator

2010-06-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:08:55PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote: > I wrote a page with a footer containing a page number. I had no trouble > saving it as an .odt file, but OpenOffice 3.0 crashed when I tried to Really 3.0? Umm. what? We're at 3.2 now since months. (And note vanilla OOo versi

Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick. Was: Looking for a .fodt validator

2010-06-04 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/04/2010 02:08 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: [snip] I wrote a page with a footer containing a page number. I had no trouble saving it as an .odt file, but OpenOffice 3.0 crashed when I tried to save it as .fodt. So it looks as if .fodt support in OpenOffice is totally fried. Not only that, but

Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick. Was: Looking for a .fodt validator

2010-06-04 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 20:11:36 +, Hendrik Boom wrote: > At this point mv .openoffice.org hide.openoffice.org doesn't help > either. > > After I moved the dotfile, I tried to start openoffice writer again. It > created a new .openoffice.org directory, but it still won't come up and > give me a

Re: It looks as if OpenOffice is sick. Was: Looking for a .fodt validator

2010-06-04 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:08:55 +, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:04:02 +, Camaleón wrote: > >> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:37:45 +, Hendrik Boom wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:49:35 +, Camaleón wrote: Also, if you open the file with a web browser (epiphany, >

It looks as if OpenOffice is sick. Was: Looking for a .fodt validator

2010-06-04 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:04:02 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:37:45 +, Hendrik Boom wrote: > >> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:49:35 +, Camaleón wrote: > >>> You can choose any XML validators out there :-) >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv >> >> To uise that, I'd fir