On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:11:39AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:27:36AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I heard that sarge was going through convulsions because changes
> > in the C implementation, were making its packages incompatible.
>
> That was ages ago, and it
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:27:36AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I heard that sarge was going through convulsions because changes
> in the C implementation, were making its packages incompatible.
That was ages ago, and it was C++, not C. The C++ transition is gradual
and isn't really something
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard that sarge was going through convulsions because changes
in the C implementation, were making its packages incompatible.
Has this process finished yet? Is sarge now as stable as it usually is?
Is it safe to upgrade? (I need a new X for my Radeon card -- and the st
I heard that sarge was going through convulsions because changes
in the C implementation, were making its packages incompatible.
Has this process finished yet? Is sarge now as stable as it usually is?
Is it safe to upgrade? (I need a new X for my Radeon card -- and the stuff
I downloaded from the
4 matches
Mail list logo
