bug=401482 this is a bug
in linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7.
The problem is, IP masquerading doesn't work when booting the
etchnhalf kernel. Is there any way to fix this? Attached is my dmesg
and iptables rules, if that information is required.
Thanks!
Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Linux
Many thanks for all these replies. I've now got it working now so that
another Debian box and a Mac can both connect through the Debian gateway.
The thing I was doing wrong was in setting the gateway on the other network
machines. Like not doing it on the Debian one [doh!] and mixing up proxy
--- Matt Zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ethx -j SNAT
> --to
> > ppp_address
>
> this is the wrong approach for a dialup where you
> would get a dynamic
> ip. use masquerading instead. (this will always work
> regardless of your
> external ip assign
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ethx -j SNAT --to
> ppp_address
this is the wrong approach for a dialup where you would get a dynamic
ip. use masquerading instead. (this will always work regardless of your
external ip assigned from the ISP)
do the following commands:
# iptables -t nat -A PO
sarge, and built a new kernel with
> > lots of the networking
> > options built in.
> >
> > I've tried to set up IP masquerading so I can use my
> > Debian PC as a router
> > to a [dialup] ISP. The Debian machine has a serial
> > modem and an ethern
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wonder if someone could help please!
>
> I've upgraded to sarge, and built a new kernel with
> lots of the networking
> options built in.
>
> I've tried to set up IP masquerading so I can use my
> Debian PC as a router
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 1:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Once connected to the ISP, the Debian machine can ping the IP address
> of its modem and get a response, and canload web pages. But other
> machines get nothing when I try.
Did you install the ipmasq package as well?
--
Paul
I wonder if someone could help please!
I've upgraded to sarge, and built a new kernel with lots of the networking
options built in.
I've tried to set up IP masquerading so I can use my Debian PC as a router
to a [dialup] ISP. The Debian machine has a serial modem and an ethernet
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:04:16 -0800, Daniel Asarnow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. It looks like I'll be at this for a while...if
> I can't make any headway with it, I'll ask for more help
>
> Thanks again,
As a basis for your rules I recommend
http://www.netfilter.org/docume
Thanks for the advice. It looks like I'll be at this for a while...if
I can't make any headway with it, I'll ask for more help
Thanks again,
da
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 03:11:38 -0600, Yusuf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your firewall rules look, uh, ugly, meaning, not meant for human eyes.
> You sh
Your firewall rules look, uh, ugly, meaning, not meant for human eyes.
You should try to isolate your problem from bottom to top:
Try a minimalistic firewall. Just for testing, of course, as this is
totally insecure:
# Clear all rules
/sbin/iptables -F; /sbin/iptables -t nat -F; /sbin/iptables
Here's the output of iptables -L -v -t nat:
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 1 packets, 60 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, 11.11.2004 at 07:57 +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Thursday 11 November 2004 03:03, Daniel Asarnow wrote:
>
> > The complete output of iptables -L is here: www.boxbattle.com/iptables.txt
> > A bit long...
>
> I don't know what its doi
On Thursday 11 November 2004 03:03, Daniel Asarnow wrote:
> The complete output of iptables -L is here: www.boxbattle.com/iptables.txt
> A bit long...
I don't know what its doing either - some things to check:-
- There is a long list of IP networks which its doing something with
(accepting or r
Hey all,
I have set up my debian box as a firewall/router for my home network
(using firehol to actually make the firewall). Everything seems to be
working just fine, except that the computers behind the firewall box
can only access some websites. They can perform succesful DNS lookups
on any sit
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:16:55AM -0400, Jim Hribar wrote:
> Installed ipmasq (apt-get install ipmasq) and it does not seem to be
> working. The error message that puzzles me is:
>
> Initializing IP Masquerading...IP Masquerade has not been enabled in the
> kernel.
>
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 20:59, Romel Sandoval wrote:
> Thank to all who help me with my IP Addresses problem
>
> Now I have successfuly configured an IP Masquerading linux gateway, of
> course with the 192.168.0.1 IP. I know its working correctly because I
> have a windows machine as
Thank to all who help me with my IP Addresses problem
Now I have successfuly configured an IP Masquerading linux gateway, of
course with the 192.168.0.1 IP. I know its working correctly because I
have a windows machine as client getting the Internet from this linux
gateway.
But I dont know what
"Ronald Castillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to update something new I have found out.. I tried pinging my ADSL
> router and my brother´s PC from my Linux box and it doesn't work either,
> but it did work from my Windows PC when I had it connected directly to
> my ADSL router. So, now I'm f
for your assistance so far..
Ronald Castillo
-Original Message-
From: Vineet Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: martes, 04 de junio de 2002 2:26
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rc.local in debian (was: Ip Masquerading)
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020603 16:51]:
>
far..
Ronald Castillo
-Original Message-
From: Vineet Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: martes, 04 de junio de 2002 2:26
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rc.local in debian (was: Ip Masquerading)
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020603 16:51]:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 a
2 2:26 AM
Subject: Re: rc.local in debian (was: Ip Masquerading)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: rc.local in debian (was: Ip Masquerading)
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:49:54PM +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
> > I was thinking that I should configure my secondary LAN card (the one
> > that connects to my "internal" network) in the /etc/network/inter
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020603 16:51]:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:49:54PM +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
> > I was thinking that I should configure my secondary LAN card (the one
> > that connects to my "internal" network) in the /etc/network/interfaces
> > card, but I don't know what
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:49:54PM +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
> I was thinking that I should configure my secondary LAN card (the one
> that connects to my "internal" network) in the /etc/network/interfaces
> card, but I don't know what to place there. I have already configured
> the LAN card t
world" without problems.
I would really appreciate any help about this.
Thanks a lot for helping me so far..
Ronald Castillo
-Original Message-
From: Colin Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin
Watson
Sent: lunes, 03 de junio de 2002 13:16
To: debian-user@lists.debian
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:08:56AM -0500, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
> I made my own entitled "local" in /etc/init.d by copying
> /etc/init.d/skeleton to /etc/init.d/local, added what I needed it to
> do in the start section, and created a softlink to it in rc2.d
> entitled S99local.
>
> I don't know
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:08:56AM -0500, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
> I made my own entitled "local" in /etc/init.d by copying
> /etc/init.d/skeleton to /etc/init.d/local, added what I needed it to
> do in the start section, and created a softlink to it in rc2.d
> entitled S99local.
>
> I don't know
o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello.
>
> Thanks to you all for your suggestions for trying to connect my Linux
> box to my Windows one via serial port, but after trying some things and
> not being able to make it work I decided to try to do that via network
> cards.
&g
Hello.
Thanks to you all for your suggestions for trying to connect my Linux
box to my Windows one via serial port, but after trying some things and
not being able to make it work I decided to try to do that via network
cards.
On the IP Masquerading HOWTO it says I have to edit my
"/etc
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010807 10:35]:
> > What is a good program for Windows 98 that will allow me to set up IP
> > Masquerading to share my internet connection with some Linux boxes?
> >
> The Right Way to do th
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010807 10:35]:
> What is a good program for Windows 98 that will allow me to set up IP
> Masquerading to share my internet connection with some Linux boxes?
>
The Right Way to do this is to make one of the Linux machines do the
masquerade. A w
set up IP
>Masquerading to share my internet connection with some Linux boxes?
>
>-- Deven
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Patrick "No sig in my .sig" Kirk
GSM: +44 7876 560 646
ICQ: 42219699
What is a good program for Windows 98 that will allow me to set up IP
Masquerading to share my internet connection with some Linux boxes?
-- Deven
On Saturday 23 June 2001 01:37, you wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 01:22:37AM +0200, Brendon wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 June 2001 01:11, Joost Kooij wrote:
> > > How did you setup masquerading, did you install ipmasq.deb or did
> > > you try everything by hand?
> >
> > I used the mini howto on www
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 01:22:37AM +0200, Brendon wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2001 01:11, Joost Kooij wrote:
> > How did you setup masquerading, did you install ipmasq.deb or did
> > you try everything by hand?
>
> I used the mini howto on www.linuxnewbie.org next to the Masquerading HOWTO.
> th
echo " - Enabling dynamic addressing measures"
# echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr
# Enable simple IP forwarding and Masquerading
#
# NOTE: In IPTABLES speak, IP Masquerading is a form of SourceNAT or SNAT.
#
# NOTE #2: The following is an
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:45:18AM +0200, Brendon wrote:
> 'fraid it had no affect. the syslogs on both machines show nothing out of the
> ordinary either
How did you setup masquerading, did you install ipmasq.deb or did
you try everything by hand?
Cheers,
Joost
On Saturday 23 June 2001 00:35, you wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:56:52PM +0200, Brendon wrote:
> > Gateway: external ip 195.38.200.201 internal ip 192.162.0.1
> > Laptop: internal ip 192.162.0.2
> > desktop:..
> >
> > the gateway is able to access the net and the laptop.
> > the laptop i
"Dwayne C. Litzenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Turn on forwarding:
>
> echo "1" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
That's already done. As I said, I can connect to remote systems
through the firewall machine, and data flows back and forth. It's
just that it freezes up within a couple of mi
Oh yeah, instead, you can edit /etc/network/options and change:
ip_forward=no
to
ip_foward=yes
Then, either run "/etc/init.d/networking restart", or reboot the system.
--
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp6ccRNFlCig.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Turn on forwarding:
echo "1" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
--
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgphUNIWDB0hH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
My main machine, scratchy, is connected to the net using PPPOE (PPP
over ethernet) over DSL. I have another machine, cheddar, connected
to a second ethernet card on scratchy with an ethernet crossover
cable. I am trying to using netfilter (iptables) to masquerade
cheddar behind scratchy, and it i
> Check your routing table with 'route -n'.
> Do you have a route on the Linux router machine that looks like this? --
>
> Destination Gateway GenmaskIface
> 200.189.192.144 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248eth1
I guess the problem is on the ipmasq rules.
I'll put thr
Guilherme Barile wrote:
> >From a computer in the 10.0.0.x network I can ping the internet (via ADSL)
> and any computer on the 10.0.1.x network (vice versa for the computers on
> the 10.0.1.x net) BUT, i cannot access the servers connected to NIC2 (eth1)
> directly I need some special rule fo
"Guilherme Barile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello debian users.
> I am having the following ip masquerading issue:
>
> 1) I have four networks in my office
>
> 200.189.194.144 (netmask 255.255.255.248) - internet servers
>
> 10.0.0.x (netmask 255.2
Hello debian users.
I am having the following ip masquerading issue:
1) I have four networks in my office
200.189.194.144 (netmask 255.255.255.248) - internet servers
10.0.0.x (netmask 255.255.255.0) - internal network
10.0.1.x (netmask 255.255.255.0) - other internal network
200.217.207.129
Debian, but is this still true? I do not have this
> package installed, but I am doing IP masquerading on my 2.2
> installation just by making a script to execute on boot from the
> commands:
> ipchains -P forward DENY ipchains -A forward -i ppp0 -j MASQ echo 1
> > /pro
ssage -
From: "Willy Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: IP masquerading
> "Kyle" == Kyle Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was reading the IP masq how-to and it shows how to setup ipchains
>
his still true? I do not have this package
installed, but I am doing IP masquerading on my 2.2 installation just
by making a script to execute on boot from the commands:
ipchains -P forward DENY
ipchains -A forward -i ppp0 -j MASQ
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
after launching my pppd (dial on demand).
Perhaps there are different ways to do it.
Dwight
"Kyle" == Kyle Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was reading the IP masq how-to and it shows how to setup ipchains
> in a rc.firewall file. From what I gather, debian uses a different
> boot system. How would I make the rc.firewall for a debian system?
> I am new to debian, I am used to u
At 11:20 AM 12/10/00 +0100, Leen Besselink wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Sebastiaan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you can make a script and put it in /etc/init.d and make a link to one of
> the /etc/rcX.d. With the number (like S40firewall) you can set the
> priority.
> As an alternative, in Debian you have a
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Sebastiaan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you can make a script and put it in /etc/init.d and make a link to one of
> the /etc/rcX.d. With the number (like S40firewall) you can set the
> priority.
> As an alternative, in Debian you have a /etc/rc.boot where you can put
> files which must be
Hi,
you can make a script and put it in /etc/init.d and make a link to one of
the /etc/rcX.d. With the number (like S40firewall) you can set the
priority.
As an alternative, in Debian you have a /etc/rc.boot where you can put
files which must be started at boottime (but not after a init 1; init 2)
Kyle Peterson wrote:
>
> I was reading the IP masq how-to and it shows how to setup ipchains in a
> rc.firewall file. From what I gather, debian uses a different boot system.
> How would I make the rc.firewall for a debian system? I am new to debian, I
> am used to using redhat.
i usually make
I was reading the IP masq how-to and it shows how to setup ipchains in a
rc.firewall file. From what I gather, debian uses a different boot system.
How would I make the rc.firewall for a debian system? I am new to debian, I
am used to using redhat.
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 11:00:59AM -0800, Michael Smith wrote:
> I just set up a masquerade box at work in about 1.5 hours (from scratch) with
> Debian. Just make your box with two nics, configure one nic for your outside
> connection, configure the other for 192.168.0.1, and then install the ipma
r here running all the time
> I was thinking to enable IP-Masquerading on one of them and build a
> firewall on it as well. It will be running Samba too. Nevertheless I'd like to
> continue using these PC's as Workstations.
>
> Does that seem to be a useful approach? I wou
is is that
things are easier all-round.
At 11:02 AM 11/11/00 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
I have two PC's at home and would like to share my internet connection
(DSL) between them. As I don't want a third computer here running all the time
I was thinking to enable IP-Masquerading on one
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000 11:02:14 +0100, Robert Kasunic said:
> Hi,
>
> I have two PC's at home and would like to share my internet connection
> (DSL) between them. As I don't want a third computer here running all the
> time
> I was thinking to enable IP-Masqueradin
Hi,
I have two PC's at home and would like to share my internet connection
(DSL) between them. As I don't want a third computer here running all the time
I was thinking to enable IP-Masquerading on one of them and build a
firewall on it as well. It will be running Samba too. Nevertheles
Willi Dyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Willi Dyck wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > I don't understand the world (Debian)anymore.
> > > > As soon as I compile things like
> > > > - ip fir
wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I don't understand the world (Debian)anymore.
> > > As soon as I compile things like
> > > - ip firewalling
> > > - ip masquerading
> > > - ip forwarding into the kernel, I can'
> on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:59:25PM -0700, Nate Amsden sent 1.1K bytes on
> their merry way:
> > not sure what kernels your using but:
>
I am using kernel 2.2.16.
> I'm using 2.2.17 (woody)
>
> > - i've never gotten MASQ to work with DNS on 2.2 i've always had to
> put
> > a DNS on the masq mac
Alvin Oga wrote:
>
> hi ya..
>
> what flags do you have set in your linux-2.2.*/.config file ???
the ones that apply to firewalls/networking:
CONFIG_PACKET=y
CONFIG_FIREWALL=y
CONFIG_FILTER=y
CONFIG_UNIX=y
CONFIG_INET=y
CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL=y
CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE=y
CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_ICMP=y
CON
> Willi Dyck wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I don't understand the world (Debian)anymore.
> > As soon as I compile things like
> > - ip firewalling
> > - ip masquerading
> > - ip forwarding into the kernel, I can't ping any host by it's name.
try putting a DNS on yer masq box and point everything to it.
Yikes! That's not a trivial task and it's of questionable value given
what I'm able to do, as stated above.
> Willi Dyck wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I don't understand the world (Debi
on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:59:25PM -0700, Nate Amsden sent 1.1K bytes on their
merry way:
> not sure what kernels your using but:
I'm using 2.2.17 (woody)
> - i've never gotten MASQ to work with DNS on 2.2 i've always had to put
> a DNS on the masq machine and point machines to it instead, this
and point everything to it.
nate
Willi Dyck wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I don't understand the world (Debian)anymore.
> As soon as I compile things like
> - ip firewalling
> - ip masquerading
> - ip forwarding into the kernel, I can't ping any host by it's name.
> I a
Hi.
I don't understand the world (Debian)anymore.
As soon as I compile things like
- ip firewalling
- ip masquerading
- ip forwarding into the kernel, I can't ping any host by it's name.
I am able to ping IP's. Seems like a DNS Lookup failure. But why??
I didn't changed
A list of steps you've already performed would be useful in order to pinpoint
where things are going wrong.
Cheers,
Jason.
--On Wednesday, August 9, 2000 6:22 -0500 Jason Schepman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HELP!! I can't get IPMASQ working. I've recompiled my kernel to add MASQ
support a
What does it say when you do: ipchains -L
Ron Rademaker
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Jason Schepman wrote:
> HELP!! I can't get IPMASQ working. I've recompiled my kernel to add MASQ
> support and I'm pretty sure that I got it right. I've read through the
> HOW-TO but I had problems following along (I
HELP!! I can't get IPMASQ working. I've recompiled my kernel to add MASQ
support and I'm pretty sure that I got it right. I've read through the
HOW-TO but I had problems following along (I think it was written with BSD
in mind.not Sys5). Anywaysany ideas or suggestions would be
helpful.
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 01:32:42PM -0700, Pann McCuaig wrote:
> 2.0.x kernels don't use ipchains, but its predecessor, whose name
> escapes me at the moment.
That would be ipfwadm.
Cheers,
Tom
--
The University of California Statistics Department; where mean is normal,
and deviation standard.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 02:09, Brad Reid wrote:
> hello i've got a LAN setup and would like a linux box on it to be a
> gateway. the LAN works fine but it is a class C network and i would
> like to enable ip masquerading on the linux box (debian slink).
> i'm having two pr
hello i've got a LAN setup and would like a linux box on it to be a
gateway. the LAN works fine but it is a class C network and i would
like to enable ip masquerading on the linux box (debian slink).
i'm having two problems:
1. debian distributions don't compile ip masquerading
I guess there's some kind of module somewhere that should be loaded in
(using modprobe).
Ron Rademaker
On Fri, 26 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Someone on this list wrote recently wondering if
> they would need to recompile their kernel inorder
> to get ip
Someone on this list wrote recently wondering if
they would need to recompile their kernel inorder
to get ip masquerading working.
They are using a stock kernel version 2.0.38 that
came with slink and said that when they executed the
command...
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny
they got the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Someone on this list wrote recently wondering if
> they would need to recompile their kernel inorder
> to get ip masquerading working.
>
> They are using a stock kernel version 2.0.38 that
> came with slink and said that when they executed the
&g
Beavis said:
> ok, is it possible to open a x-windows interface through a ssh connection
> from a remote location all on static IP's?
Yes.
> more specifically, start x from a ssh client on another system.
>
> if so, please don't just say it is possible, but explain how
ssh to the other box. En
to my machine at work
from
beavis >home
beavis >> > and all works well as long as I stay within the console session.
beavis >However,
beavis >> > I'm on a dialup line (no DSL yet...) and use IP masquerading, which
beavis >appears
beavis >> > to preve
-- just a guy from a small town trying to learn something
> > I'm currently set up such that I can ssh into my machine at work from
home
> > and all works well as long as I stay within the console session.
However,
> > I'm on a dialup line (no DSL yet...) and use IP masq
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 06:48:19PM +0200, Philip Lehman wrote:
>
> I'm trying to set up IP masquerading on a slink/potato box which is
> supposed to route the traffic on my home LAN over an ISDN dial-up
> line. I have to admit that I have no experience with advanced
> net
I'm trying to set up IP masquerading on a slink/potato box which is
supposed to route the traffic on my home LAN over an ISDN dial-up
line. I have to admit that I have no experience with advanced
networking of this kind.
I read the IP masquerading HOWTO. It suggests a sample "rc.firewa
> I'm currently set up such that I can ssh into my machine at work from home
> and all works well as long as I stay within the console session. However,
> I'm on a dialup line (no DSL yet...) and use IP masquerading, which appears
> to prevent X clients on my work box fr
I'm currently set up such that I can ssh into my machine at work from home
and all works well as long as I stay within the console session. However,
I'm on a dialup line (no DSL yet...) and use IP masquerading, which appears
to prevent X clients on my work box from connecting to the X s
I have recently switched my ISDN card to a firewall machine, running
kernel 2.2.13 and slink.
I am now finding that connections remain open for up to 10 minutes.
I think that the masquerading part of the kernel has opened them in
order to fulfil connection requests, but is not closing them when
th
even as I speak, fetchmail on orwell is blocking on the
connect() call because it cannot establish a TCP connection with the
outside world. I'm totally bewildered. Twenty minutes from now, it could
work fine.
Instead of using the ipmasq package, I setup the network and some
special IP-Masqueradin
Marcin
If you are ready to live dangerously, I would suggest you join the
the Linux Kernel mailing list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] They
should steer you in the right direction.
--
David Natkins
Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax to: (718) 488-1780
Phone: (718) 403-2474
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:12:51AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would like to know if there is a standard place to put the ipchains
> commands for ip masquerading so they get executed at boot time. For now,
> I stuck them in /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh but if there is a more
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:12:51AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I would like to know if there is a standard place to put the ipchains
> commands for ip masquerading so they get executed at boot time. For now,
> I stuck them in /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh but if
Greetings:
I would like to know if there is a standard place to put the ipchains
commands for ip masquerading so they get executed at boot time. For now,
I stuck them in /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh but if there is a more customary
location for them I want to put them there so that they don&#
m all 192.168.10.0/24 0.0.0.0/0n/a
---
And the ipfwadm -M -ln is:
IP masquerading entries
prot expire source destination ports
udp 04:57.47 192.168.10.13xxx.xxx.xx.5 137 (61046) -> 137
udp 00:19.32 192.1
On Sun, Jun 27, 1999 at 12:24:03AM -0400, Paul Miller wrote:
> I'm using Debian/unstable and kernel v2.2.10. I have a ip masquerading
> Linux box setup and working. I'd like to configure ports 137 to 139 of an
> internal machine to act as ports 20137 to 20139 on the external
I'm using Debian/unstable and kernel v2.2.10. I have a ip masquerading
Linux box setup and working. I'd like to configure ports 137 to 139 of an
internal machine to act as ports 20137 to 20139 on the external interface of
the Linux box. I.e., the internal ip address sent from th
ing all the security rules and that helps.
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Marc MacIntyre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 6:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba/Windows/etc over IP Masquerading
Paul, I saw your post on the mailing list, and am fac
I'm running Debian/Linux "potato" kernel 2.2.10 with Samba 2.0.4b and I'm
trying to setup a Linux box to masquerade and allow browsing across the
Linux box. Currently, IP Masquerading is working and I'm using the default
Debian auto-configuration. More specifically, I
On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 07:47:36AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any Debian specific documentation on IP Masquerading? I've read
> the mini how-to, but debian seems to have this extra /etc/ipmasq.conf file
> so I'm looking foe the correct way to configure deb
On Mon, 14 Jun 1999 07:47:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Is there any Debian specific documentation on IP Masquerading? I've read
>the mini how-to, but debian seems to have this extra /etc/ipmasq.conf file
>so I'm looking foe the correct way to configure debian IP Mas
Is there any Debian specific documentation on IP Masquerading? I've read
the mini how-to, but debian seems to have this extra /etc/ipmasq.conf file
so I'm looking foe the correct way to configure debian IP Masquerading
before I start asking any stupid questions. If there isn'
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
