On Lu, 06 oct 14, 21:13:17, Stuart Longland wrote:
>
> The beef I have, is this not what happens if you do an `apt-get
> download` or an `apt-get source`: in both those latter cases, it never
> asks the question, it just flatly refuses to give you the sources.
>
> Now, merely obtaining the binary
On Mon 06 Oct 2014 at 21:13:17 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> On 06/10/14 19:43, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 06 oct 14, 14:00:42, Stuart Longland wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Now for whatever reason, if I want to *install* those packages. No
> >> > problem. It'll ask whether I wish to install the
On 06/10/14 19:43, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 06 oct 14, 14:00:42, Stuart Longland wrote:
>> >
>> > Now for whatever reason, if I want to *install* those packages. No
>> > problem. It'll ask whether I wish to install them even though no one
>> > can vouch (digitally) for them.
>> >
>> > How
On Lu, 06 oct 14, 14:00:42, Stuart Longland wrote:
>
> Now for whatever reason, if I want to *install* those packages. No
> problem. It'll ask whether I wish to install them even though no one
> can vouch (digitally) for them.
>
> However, it fails to ask the same question when I tell it to dow
;t recall having an issue with this in the past
> including with Ubuntu 12.04 which is more or less a similar vintage to
> Debian Wheezy.
I don't know what can be the cause of your trouble, but if this trouble
has just started happening then something must have caused it. Since
this is
>> Even though I tell apt-get to force download of the package sources
>> (which, I might add, I can personally vouch for as I put them there), it
>> refuses to do so because the package repository is unsigned.
>>
>> Now I *could* organise a gpg key to sign the repository with. I have
>> administ
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:40:23AM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For some time now my workplace has had an APT repository for in-house
> developed packages for software we either produce or support.
>
> This lives on an internal intranet server and is accessed
Hi all,
For some time now my workplace has had an APT repository for in-house
developed packages for software we either produce or support.
This lives on an internal intranet server and is accessed over plain
HTTP. This has worked well for some time now. Until today I notice:
> stuartl@q
On Monday 04 July 2005 16:54, Israel Garcia wrote:
> List, I have 14 debian sarge on my intranet, and, they have access
> internet trough a http proxy server. I would like to make a mirror
> repository inside my network, How can I do this?
> Does anybody has any script to do this?
ap
Israel Garcia wrote:
> List, I have 14 debian sarge on my intranet, and, they have access
> internet trough a http proxy server. I would like to make a mirror
> repository inside my network, How can I do this?
> Does anybody has any script to do this?
>
Use a proxy such as ap
List, I have 14 debian sarge on my intranet, and, they have access
internet trough a http proxy server. I would like to make a mirror
repository inside my network, How can I do this?
Does anybody has any script to do this?
--
Regards;
Israel Garcia
t-
Von: Harland Christofferson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. März 2004 20:11
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: subnet seen on intranet
i have a network i use for code development branching off of
the corporate intranet. the t
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 02:11:21PM -0500, Harland Christofferson wrote:
> i have a network i use for code development branching off of
> the corporate intranet. the topology is:
>
> +---+ +-+
> | 192.168.1.100 |-
i have a network i use for code development branching off of
the corporate intranet. the topology is:
+---+ +-+
| 192.168.1.100 |---| 192.168.1.1 |
+---+ | 10.20.0.0 |
engineering3a | 10.20.1.158 |--- to/from
hi!
I would like to know how to exchange intranet mails. Intranet in this case, includes a Linux Redhat 9 machine, which acts as the server, and the clients are Windows (9x) machines.
It would be great if you could give some advice on online tutorials and links, as soon as possible!
thanks
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
> I have mail delivered via a smarthost (mail.com). I have a couple of
> people aliases through this account. There is only one email address:
I'm gonna venture a guess that you have your local mail server
configured so that it accepts all mail for ma
I have mail delivered via a smarthost (mail.com). I have a couple of
people aliases through this account. There is only one email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but the account also recognizes [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL
PROTECTED] (as aliases).
I use procmail to filter these people into a Cyrus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Ramon Acedo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know that apache can manage vhosts and I could redirect to a intranet
> host all the web traffic coming to www2.mydomain.org, the same can be
> done with wu-ftp or proftp where u can have multiple dom
n would go over the 192 subnet and queries to the internet
would resolve via ns1.
justin
-Original Message-
From: Ramon Acedo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 6:32 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Emulate real ip's to access intr
host I have
> a DNS server, mail server, web, etc. The important point is at the DNS.
> What i'd like to do is that the firewall forward all the packets
> independently of the destiny port, which can be any, to a host of the
> intranet with a private ip.
This is simply impossible
t i'd like to do is that the firewall forward all the packets
independently of the destiny port, which can be any, to a host of the
intranet with a private ip. The rule for decide which packets go to what
host in the intranet is the name that the client refered to.
Example:
when I d
>I'd like to access to the hosts of my intranet with private ip's from the
>outside.
>I have the following net:
One or few weeks ago the same questions was up and the list
concluded the discussion with the result, that this best way seems to
be to ssh-portforwarding - that mean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 10 February 2002 10:39 pm, Ramon Acedo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to access to the hosts of my intranet with private ip's from the
> outside.
> I have the following net:
>
> A real domain name server managed by
* Ramon Acedo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020210 14:43]:
> I just want that when someone try to access to host1.mydomain.net from the
> internet my firewall (and dns server)
> forward the request to host1.local which has the private ip 192.168.1.20.
I've thought about this problem, but I don't think ther
This one time, at band camp, Ramon Acedo said:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to access to the hosts of my intranet with private ip's from the
> outside.
> I have the following net:
>
> A real domain name server managed by the computer which has the real ip, so
> I can
Hi!
I'd like to access to the hosts of my intranet with private ip's from the
outside.
I have the following net:
A real domain name server managed by the computer which has the real ip, so
I can set all the names and
subdomains that I need.
A firewall wich is the same host than the dn
folks,
ipppd/isdnlog is very capable of callerid, and i wrote a script to
notify the workstations on our intranet of incoming calls. most of the
workstations used to be windoze, so i used smbclient to write to
winpopup, but as time goes by, users grow smarter and debian is slowly
replacing all
Hi,
i want to make an intranet server with the stable testing and unstable
distribution mirror ftp.
In this way my other servers will be updated by this, configuring apt in
appropriate configuration.
I have tried the script found at the link
http://www.it.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror
that
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, André Bell wrote:
>
> >> Apache tells me "httpd: cannot determine local host name. Use the
> >> ServerName directive to set it manually."
>
> While I'm at it, is it necessary to setup a DNS in order to give a server a
> name? I've no intention of going online with this part
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> Sort of...
> Strictly speaking, DNS is not required for internet access. More
> accurately, an end user does not have to set up DNS on his/her machine
> to enable him/her to go onto the internet. The internet service
> providers provide one or more of t
William T Wilson wrote:
> No. DNS is only necessary if you want to go on the Internet. If you are
> not on any network (or if you only have a home LAN) you can do everything
> you need with the /etc/hosts file.
Sort of...
Strictly speaking, DNS is not required for internet access. More
accuratel
On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 05:31:48PM -0700, André Bell wrote:
| >> Apache tells me "httpd: cannot determine local host name. Use the
| >> ServerName directive to set it manually."
|
| While I'm at it, is it necessary to setup a DNS in order to give a server a
| name? I've no intention of going onli
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, [iso-8859-1] Andr? Bell wrote:
> While I'm at it, is it necessary to setup a DNS in order to give a
> server a name? I've no intention of going online with this particular
> pc.
No. DNS is only necessary if you want to go on the Internet. If you are
not on any network (or
>> Apache tells me "httpd: cannot determine local host name. Use the
>> ServerName directive to set it manually."
While I'm at it, is it necessary to setup a DNS in order to give a server a
name? I've no intention of going online with this particular pc.
Thanks.
Andre'
or a local diald
masquerading connection manager, or an intranet web server, or both) that needs
not to be switched off after work time, but can use the least possible power
when inactive until maintenance time overnight, and sit sleeping again until
the first connection the next morning: what are al
This is a little off-topic;however
I've just been tasked with setting up an Intranet Web Server for our company
and I need some help with "sizing" - I haven't been able to find any info on
this posted on the web anywhere.
Anyway, I want leverage my existing experience wi
On Thu, 20 Feb 1997, Seth Reinosa wrote:
> My church is building an intranet (Lord willing). We are going to have
> @ 5 macs with localtalk and the localtalk server connected to a PC
> runnning linux. Can I have the Linux beast connected directly to the
> Mac toy with a single rj45 c
On Thu, 20 Feb 1997, Seth Reinosa wrote:
> I would also like to know if I really need any other software.
You should probably install Squid in the linux machine. It's a WWW cache
that can save bandwidth and improve performance...
Nicolás Lichtmaier.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM T
>Can I have the Linux beast connected directly to the Mac toy with a single
>rj45 cable or do I need a hub. (I know about the ethernet cards)
I think you need to use ethertalk not localtalk but I'm not positive.
You can connect two computers (in this case the linux box and *one* Mac)
with a rj45
My church is building an intranet (Lord willing).
We are going to have @ 5 macs with localtalk and the localtalk server
connected to a PC runnning linux.
Can I have the Linux beast connected directly to the Mac toy with a single
rj45 cable or do I need a hub. (I know about the ethernet cards)
I
40 matches
Mail list logo
