Re: Interpretation of the dmidecode information

2010-01-02 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:22:03 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Camaleón put forth on 1/2/2010 12:44 PM: > >> Maybe older SMBIOS versions just display wrong or incorrect data. Just >> trust the manufacturer's specs. > > I wouldn't make that general statement about SMBIOS age playing a role > in incor

Re: Interpretation of the dmidecode information

2010-01-02 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Camaleón put forth on 1/2/2010 12:44 PM: > Maybe older SMBIOS versions just display wrong or incorrect data. Just > trust the manufacturer's specs. I wouldn't make that general statement about SMBIOS age playing a role in incorrect data. More than likely this is a vendor/mainboard BIOS specific

Re: Interpretation of the dmidecode information

2010-01-02 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:56:43 -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > I have the following doubt on the basis of the maximum amount of > supported ram memory. dmidecode shows the following thing: > > - > Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 8 bytes

Interpretation of the dmidecode information

2010-01-02 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, all! I have the following doubt on the basis of the maximum amount of supported ram memory. dmidecode shows the following thing: - Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 8 bytes Base Board Information Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Comput