Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> Didn't the initial message say that the Internet *was* working, and then
> suddenly *stopped* working, right in the middle of a download?
>
> That, together with the interface not being UP, points to the
> configuration being OK, but something going wrong at the hardware
Another user here made a comment that clued me into what the problem
really was. I had done an update of Trixie which went fine. Then I
started to do something which I had been planning for a while - remove
the Cinnamon desktop. I was doing it piecemeal when seemingly the
internet dropped
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:24:22 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
> ip address show
> 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
> group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd
> 00:00:00:00:00:00
> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lovalid_lft forever preferred_lft
> forever
> i
Am Montag, 16. September 2024, 19:59:44 CEST schrieb Frank McCormick:
> I am faced with a strange problem. I have no internet access on Trixie
> on one of two partitions on my ssd.
> I was attempting to solve a problem I am having with Vivaldi by
> installing Seahorse. Apt quit hal
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 15:47:10 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Tom Furie wrote:
> > Actually, it doesn't look good - you don't have any ip addresses on eno1,
> > the interface is down. You're going to have to find out why that is.
>
> Since it's recognized, it was probably not configured.
>
> Easie
Tom Furie wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 03:24:22PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> > ip address show
> > 2: eno1: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default
> > qlen 1000
> > link/ether 44:87:fc:d8:3b:53 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff altname enp0s25
>
> > I am no expert but it seems to look
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 03:24:22PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> ip address show
> 2: eno1: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default
> qlen 1000
> link/ether 44:87:fc:d8:3b:53 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff altname enp0s25
> I am no expert but it seems to look good. Firefox can't find any site
On 2024-09-16 14:46, tuxi...@posteo.de wrote:
On Monday, September 16, 2024 7:59:44 PM CEST Frank McCormick wrote:
I am faced with a strange problem. I have no internet access on Trixie
on one of two partitions on my ssd.
Hi!
I'm having similar random disconnect issues where even
On 2024-09-16 14:21, Dan Ritter wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
It's not a hardware
problem as I have full access on the other partition which runs Opensuse
Tumbleweed. Earlier today I did an update of Trixie and it went fine.
We can rule out the ISP, the router, any switches in the way,
On 16 Sep 2024 14:46 -0400, from debianl...@videotron.ca (Frank McCormick):
>> # systemctl restart networking
>
>I'll reboot and try that. Following a suggestion I found on the net I did
> sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart and that **seems** to have restarted the
> network, BUT browsers can'
On 2024-09-16 14:21, Dan Ritter wrote:
Ever since that I have no internet access in Trixie. It's not a hardware
problem as I have full access on the other partition which runs Opensuse
Tumbleweed. Earlier today I did an update of Trixie and it went fine.
We can rule out the ISP
On Monday, September 16, 2024 7:59:44 PM CEST Frank McCormick wrote:
> I am faced with a strange problem. I have no internet access on Trixie
> on one of two partitions on my ssd.
> I was attempting to solve a problem I am having with Vivaldi by
> installing Seahorse. Apt quit hal
On 2024-09-16 14:27, Kent West wrote:
On 9/16/24 12:59 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
I am faced with a strange problem. I have no internet access on Trixie
on one of two partitions on my ssd.
I was attempting to solve a problem I am having with Vivaldi by
installing Seahorse. Apt quit
Am 16.09.2024 um 20:27 schrieb Kent West:
>
> On 9/16/24 12:59 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
>> I am faced with a strange problem. I have no internet access on Trixie
>> on one of two partitions on my ssd.
>> I was attempting to solve a problem I am having with Vivaldi b
Frank McCormick wrote:
> I am faced with a strange problem. I have no internet access on Trixie on
> one of two partitions on my ssd.
> I was attempting to solve a problem I am having with Vivaldi by installing
> Seahorse. Apt quit halfway through downloading the necessary files
>
On 9/16/24 12:59 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
I am faced with a strange problem. I have no internet access on Trixie
on one of two partitions on my ssd.
I was attempting to solve a problem I am having with Vivaldi by
installing Seahorse. Apt quit halfway through downloading the
necessary
I am faced with a strange problem. I have no internet access on Trixie
on one of two partitions on my ssd.
I was attempting to solve a problem I am having with Vivaldi by
installing Seahorse. Apt quit halfway through downloading the necessary
files complaining it could not resolve a bunch of
On 11/04/2024 20:53, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I am running Bullseye and attempting to use QEMU/KVM virt-manager, on
the computers on my LAN rather than Oracle VM VirtualBox.
[...]
However, when I pinged yahoo.com. I got the result:
Reply from 169.234.75.136: Destination host unreachable.
I
Am 11.04.2024 um 09:53:30 Uhr schrieb Stephen P. Molnar:
> I followed the How To (HowTo.txt, attached) without any warning or
> error messages. However, when I pinged yahoo.com. I got the result:
>
> Reply from 169.234.75.136: Destination host unreachable.
You have to specify how your network is
I am running Bullseye and attempting to use QEMU/KVM virt-manager, on
the computers on my LAN rather than Oracle VM VirtualBox.
I particularly would like to be able to run Windows 10 as there in one
application that I need for my molecular modeling research that is not
available for Linux.
I
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 13:51 riveravaldez
wrote:
> > I was not able to ping google.com: no dns address found so it just hung.
>
> If you can, for instance, `ping 8.8.8.8`, maybe it's just a DNS
> misconfiguration. You can try setting the IP address of the modem
> (something like 192.168.0.1 or 10
> I was not able to ping google.com: no dns address found so it just hung.
If you can, for instance, `ping 8.8.8.8`, maybe it's just a DNS
misconfiguration. You can try setting the IP address of the modem
(something like 192.168.0.1 or 10.0.0.1, for instance) as DNS.
> I was able to get a respons
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 15:35 riveravaldez
wrote:
> On 6/30/22, Tom Browder wrote:
> > (...)
Thanks for your suggestions. I was able to briefly look at the responses
but I will have to give exact details tomorrow.
I was not able to ping google.com: no dns address found so it just hung.
I was
oogle.com ?
If the laptop is connected to the LAN (I suppose through Wi-Fi) maybe
the DHCP assigned the same local IP-address to more than one device
(I'm just guessing), and sometimes that blocks the Internet access.
Hope you had luck with the issue. Kind regards!
I came home after being away for over a week, logged in to my home server
(Debian 11 on a laptop) remotely through a terminix app on my iPad, checked
for updates, accepted all and started the update. (I stupidly did not use
an open terminal on the laptop screen and watch as I normally do.)
Note I
On 16/10/2020, Brett Gilio wrote:
> "Susmita/Rajib" writes:
>
>> So far as I am concerned I have temporarily put the thread to rest.
>
> Stay well, these are hard times. We only have each other.
>
> Best
... ... [snipped] ... ... [snipped]
...
developers contemplated means of faster
internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
Lap- /Desk- tops?
To: Susmita/Rajib
Cc: Dan Ritter , debian-user@lists.debian.org
"Susmita/Rajib" writes:
... ... [snipped] ... ...
"Susmita/Rajib" writes:
> So far as I am concerned I have temporarily put the thread to rest.
Stay well, these are hard times. We only have each other.
Best
--
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87
"Susmita/Rajib" writes:
> Having studied physics I have come across many epoch-making twists
> when established mathematicians of their eras have been dethroned by
> new experiments and subsequently new invention/discoveries.
>
> I continue to remember that we are only slightly evolved irrational
-- Received message --
From: Dan Ritter
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 14:16:52 -0400
Subject: Re: Have Debian developers contemplated means of faster
internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
Lap- /Desk- tops?
To: Susmita/Rajib
Cc: debian-user
Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> -- Received message --
>
> > ... ... The particular solutions you are proposing are not
> > going to work. You are reasoning by analogy, which is good for
> > solving many human problems,... ... ...
>
> But S
-- Received message --
From: Dan Ritter
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:54:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Have Debian developers contemplated means of faster
internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
Lap- /Desk- tops?
To: Susmita/Rajib
Cc: debian-user
Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> Kind Sir,
>
> I went through your entire message very carefully. Some areas you had
> already mentioned. Some were indeed new to me! Some I knew.
>
> But carefully reading through your message, I failed to find this part
> of my Email addressed:
>
> [Quote]
> It appears t
iple ISPs would have been
non-existent.
-- Received message --
From: Dan Ritter
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 08:35:43 -0400
Subject: Re: Have Debian developers contemplated means of faster
internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
Lap- /Desk- tops?
To: Susmi
Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> >> So what is essentially required is theoretically a list that keeps
> >> record of time, order and port, of each of the packets requests made,
> >> and rearrange the packets received from all ports according to that
> >> list, to provide the system with a complete file.
>
--
From: Dan Ritter
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 06:42:45 -0400
Subject: Re: Have Debian developers contemplated means of faster
internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
Lap- /Desk- tops?
To: Susmita/Rajib
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On 15/10/2020, Dan Ritter wrote
Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> -- Received message --
> From: Dan Ritter
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:46:25 -0400
> Subject: Re: Have Debian developers contemplated means of faster
> internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
> Lap- /Desk- t
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 09:04:47AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
[...]
> I just put these things down to cultural differences [...]
Exactly. This mailing list's cultural scope is broad, to put
it mildly.
I, for my part, am reminded how rude "our" (some non-exclusive, but
also non-exhaustive subset of time
On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 17:55 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 14 oct 20, 15:31:14, Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> > To,
> > The Team User,
> > debian-user@lists.debian.org,
> > Debian.org
> >
> > My dear illustrious Team User Leaders,
> >
> > Good afternoon, leaders.
>
> Hello,
>
> The debian-user
-- Received message --
From: Dan Ritter
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:46:25 -0400
Subject: Re: Have Debian developers contemplated means of faster
internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
Lap- /Desk- tops?
To: Susmita/Rajib
Cc: debian-user
-- Received message --
From: Nicholas Geovanis
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:57:41 -0500
Subject: Re: Have Debian developers contemplated means of faster
internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
Lap- /Desk- tops?
To: Susmita/Rajib , Debian Users ML
-- Recieved message --
From: Andrei POPESCU
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:55:33 +0300
Subject: Re: Have Debian developers contemplated means of faster
internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
Lap- /Desk- tops?
To: Susmita/Rajib
Cc: debian-user
different ways
than you will.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020, 9:21 AM Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> -- Received message --
> From: Dan Ritter
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:17:25 -0400
> Subject: Re: Have Debian developers contemplated means of faster
> internet access, using in parallel mul
olleague, not a superior).
Addressing us with such formality is... hilarious :)
> My post at the Debian Forums may please be perused here:
> Faster internet access by parallelly using multiple ISPs
> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=147081#p727593
>
> There's a softwar
Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> -- Received message --
> Wow! Unbelievable, Dr. Ritter, but I understood your line of reasoning.
I don't think my family has a Dr. Ritter in it, although several
of my cousins have doctorates (medical, ceramic engineering,
physics...)
> Okay, but then some
-- Received message --
From: Dan Ritter
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:17:25 -0400
Subject: Re: Have Debian developers contemplated means of faster
internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
Lap- /Desk- tops?
To: Susmita/Rajib
Cc: debian-user
ve multiple USB ports in our laptops/dektops, and smartphones
> with USB ports and opportunity for USB tethering and internet access
> from the smartphone's mobile Network provider using SIM cards.
>
> I wish to use two ISPs, i.e., two snartphones in USB teethering, and
> com
-- Received message --
From: Nicholas Geovanis
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:22:56 -0500
Subject: Re: Has Debian developers contemplated means of faster
internet access, using in parallel multiple ISPs from Debian installed
Lap- /Desk- tops
To: Susmita/Rajib , Debian Users ML
Debian
e Team User,
> debian-user@lists.debian.org,
> Debian.org
>
> My dear illustrious Team User Leaders,
>
> Good afternoon, leaders.
>
> My post at the Debian Forums may please be perused here:
> Faster internet access by parallelly using multiple ISPs
> http://forums.d
To,
The Team User,
debian-user@lists.debian.org,
Debian.org
My dear illustrious Team User Leaders,
Good afternoon, leaders.
My post at the Debian Forums may please be perused here:
Faster internet access by parallelly using multiple ISPs
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=14
To,
The Team User,
debian-user@lists.debian.org,
Debian.org
My dear illustrious Team User Leaders,
Good afternoon, leaders.
My post at the Debian Forums may please be perused here:
Faster internet access by parallelly using multiple ISPs
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=14
To,
The Team User,
debian-user@lists.debian.org,
Debian.org
My dear illustrious Team User Leaders,
Good afternoon, leaders.
My post at the Debian Forums may please be perused here:
Faster internet access by parallelly using multiple ISPs
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=14
>> What kind of AP would consume 20W? Mine consumes around 5W and that includes
>> a 2TB disk attached to it (and spinning).
> An Asus RT-N56U needs 30W max. A Linksys EA6900 needs 42W.
I'm not concerned about max consumption. I'm talking about 24/7
consumption (i.e. the impact on the monthly kW
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:51:03AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > a maximum consumption of about 3W, and has no configuration at
> [...]
> > A typical AP needs 10-20W,
>
> What kind of AP would consume 20W? Mine consumes around 5W and that includes
> a 2TB disk attached to it (and spinning).
A
> a maximum consumption of about 3W, and has no configuration at
[...]
> A typical AP needs 10-20W,
What kind of AP would consume 20W? Mine consumes around 5W and that includes
a 2TB disk attached to it (and spinning).
> and has an expected lifetime of 1-4 years.
Where do you get those numbers?
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:14:27PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Nope. Buy a $20 5-8 port ethernet switch. Very reliable. That's
> > in the diagram above as "switch".
>
> But it also means one more box. If you had one box before, that doubles
> the number of boxes, and might also double the 24
> Nope. Buy a $20 5-8 port ethernet switch. Very reliable. That's
> in the diagram above as "switch".
But it also means one more box. If you had one box before, that doubles
the number of boxes, and might also double the 24/7 power consumption.
Stefan
-Ethernet passes on through an Ethernet cable
> to the WAN port of the AP. This would be the connection that Dan suggests
> shifting to a LAN port of the AP. Despite some clucking from various
> sources about the performance I'd get from using a USB to Ethernet adaptor,
> in practice I
On 2016-08-08 8:30, pasc...@sdf.org wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016, Curt wrote:
>>
>> I haven't been following the thread (discussion beyond my technical
>> reach) but couldn't the little man boot up a live cd or usb drive and
>> surf his little heart out? Someone talked about targeting the MAC
>> ad
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016, Curt wrote:
On 2016-08-07, p...@gatech.edu wrote:
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 at 20:00, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Perhaps he wants to stop his children/grandchildren/house guests surfing
the
web at 3:00 am.
Spot on, Lisi!
Hello,
If the computer is not supposed to be connected a
On 2016-08-07, p...@gatech.edu wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 at 20:00, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps he wants to stop his children/grandchildren/house guests surfing
> the
>>> web at 3:00 am.
>
>> Spot on, Lisi!
>
> Hello,
> If the computer is not supposed to be connected at all, then maybe:
>
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 03:15, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 07 Aug 2016 at 03:32:00 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> > In the end I got what I needed by using Lars' pointer of the iptables
> > extensions. I copied the iptables systemd service unit from my LFS box to
> > the machine in question, and then cr
Le 5 août 2016 16:23, "Mark Fletcher" a écrit :
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 at 20:00, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> Perhaps he wants to stop his children/grandchildren/house guests surfing
the
>> web at 3:00 am.
> Spot on, Lisi!
Hello,
If the computer is not supposed to be connected at all, then maybe:
sudo
On Sun 07 Aug 2016 at 03:32:00 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> In the end I got what I needed by using Lars' pointer of the iptables
> extensions. I copied the iptables systemd service unit from my LFS box to
> the machine in question, and then created a script in /etc/systemd/scripts
> that first s
the native
Ethernet port and the USB-to-Ethernet passes on through an Ethernet cable
to the WAN port of the AP. This would be the connection that Dan suggests
shifting to a LAN port of the AP. Despite some clucking from various
sources about the performance I'd get from using a USB to Eth
ring on your LFS box.
> >
> > Match your kid's machine by MAC address.
> >
> > Write two tiny scripts:
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > iptables -D FORWARD -m mac --mac-source 58:63:1a:af:71:72 -j DROP
> >
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > iptables -I FORWARD -m mac
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:43 AM Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 15:49:28 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM Brian wrote:
> >
> > > Sticking with the idea of using a systemd service file, the script it
> > > runs would check the time and alter the routing table
72 -j DROP
>
>
> #!/bin/sh
> iptables -I FORWARD -m mac --mac-source 58:63:1a:af:71:72 -j DROP
>
> (substituting in the appropriate MAC address for the machine, of
> course)
>
> and run the first one at 9 PM to disable internet access, and
> run the second one at 8 A
ng in the appropriate MAC address for the machine, of
> > course)
> >
> > and run the first one at 9 PM to disable internet access, and
> > run the second one at 8 AM or whatever to re-enable it. Cron is
> > your friend.
>
> For this particular situation (LFS=Li
-j DROP
>
>
> #!/bin/sh
> iptables -I FORWARD -m mac --mac-source 58:63:1a:af:71:72 -j DROP
>
> (substituting in the appropriate MAC address for the machine, of
> course)
>
> and run the first one at 9 PM to disable internet access, and
> run the second one at 8 AM
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 15:49:28 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM Brian wrote:
>
> > Sticking with the idea of using a systemd service file, the script it
> > runs would check the time and alter the routing table when necessary.
> > Neither cron nor iptables need come
7;s machine by MAC address.
Write two tiny scripts:
#!/bin/sh
iptables -D FORWARD -m mac --mac-source 58:63:1a:af:71:72 -j DROP
#!/bin/sh
iptables -I FORWARD -m mac --mac-source 58:63:1a:af:71:72 -j DROP
(substituting in the appropriate MAC address for the machine, of
course)
and run the first on
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 15:03:47 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 12:00:28 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Friday 05 August 2016 11:40:28 Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > How essential is this? cron could
> > >
> > > ip route add default via
> > >
> > > at specific times between 9pm and 9a
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 12:00:28 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Friday 05 August 2016 11:40:28 Brian wrote:
>
> Let us look at this from a different angle. If the machine is given a
> fixed address it negates the need for dhcp checking, If, addition
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:26 PM Lars Noodén wrote:
>
> iptables has some match extensions that will work with UTC time,
> specifically the extensions --timestart and --timestop Using those you
> should be able to make rules that operate all the time but block traffic
> during the specified hours.
nd block it between 9pm and 9am. Ideally
> allow
> > > local network access throughout but block Internet access between 9pm
> and
> > > 9am, but I can accept total network blockage in the off times if
> > > necessary.
> >
> > Your ideal is achievable.
&g
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 12:00:28 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 05 August 2016 11:40:28 Brian wrote:
> >
> > How essential is this? cron could
> >
> > ip route add default via
> >
> > at specific times between 9pm and 9am and then remove the default route.
> > If the machine isn't up all th
ork access throughout but block Internet access between 9pm and
> > 9am, but I can accept total network blockage in the off times if
> > necessary.
>
> Your ideal is achievable.
>
> ip route del default via
>
> Plus a cron job.
>
> > The machine is used
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 00:02:40 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On a stretch box I have, I want to allow access to the Internet between the
> hours of 9am and 9pm and block it between 9pm and 9am. Ideally allow local
> network access throughout but block Internet access between 9pm and 9am
On 08/05/2016 03:02 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On a stretch box I have, I want to allow access to the Internet between the
> hours of 9am and 9pm and block it between 9pm and 9am. Ideally allow local
> network access throughout but block Internet access between 9pm and 9am,
> but
On a stretch box I have, I want to allow access to the Internet between the
hours of 9am and 9pm and block it between 9pm and 9am. Ideally allow local
network access throughout but block Internet access between 9pm and 9am,
but I can accept total network blockage in the off times if necessary
re network adapter
> (ie. enable internet access)?
>
>> The answer, though, is not strictly what you asked for: it also
> removes the kernel image metapackages, so your kernel will not get > new
> kernels when you do an apt-get upgrade.
>
> No offence, Richard but you&#x
Dream on Ralf. Dream on.
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: Post-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 21:43 +1000, Andrew
g"
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: Post-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On 7/06/2014 9:14 PM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
> You dirty old man, where are the expletives? I miss them you know.
>
> You have been work
From: Richard Hector
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Post-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
> The answer, though, is not strictly what you asked for: it a
@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:04 AM
Subject: Re: Post-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On 6/6/2014 2:59 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:03 -0700, Horatio Leragon wr
Go ahead Lisi
Threats are for cowards made by cowards.
From: Lisi Reisz
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: Post-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On Friday 06
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 21:43 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
[snip]
Andrew do _not_ reply to Horatio yet. Only consider to reply, assumed he
should apologized to the list and especially to Jerry!
TIA,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Why should I apologize when it's clearly Jerry Stuckup's fault?
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: Post-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet acce
igure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On 7/06/2014 4:45 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 03:09 -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote:
>> Did you know that I'm dyslexic? And there are many categories of
>> dyslexia?
>
> I suffer from dyslexia too, bu
On 7/06/2014 9:14 PM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
> You dirty old man, where are the expletives? I miss them you know.
>
> You have been working behind the scenes, haven't you?
No, you reap your own /rewards/ I'm just glad that others can see
through you as well.
It will only be natural with yo
r (ie.
enable internet access)?
On 7/06/2014 4:14 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> I doubt it, Andrew. Trolls like him don't go away easily.
Unfortunately I am pretty sure you are right Jerry, but I am amazed that
people are still /trying/ to help him even after he has shown horrible
form and he h
-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On 6/6/2014 12:08 PM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
>
>
> *From:* Jerry Stuckle
> *To:* debian-user@lists.debian.org
> *Sent:* Friday, June 6, 2014 10:39
You're speaking for yourself, troll.
From: Jerry Stuckle
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 2:14 AM
Subject: Re: Post-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On 6/6/2014 1:37 PM, A
: Re: Post-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On 6/6/2014 12:14 PM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
>
>
> *From:* Jerry Stuckle
> *To:* debian-user@lists.debian.org
> *Se
-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On 6/6/2014 12:03 PM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
>
>
> *From:* Jerry Stuckle
> *To:* Horatio Leragon
> *Sent:* Friday, June 6, 2014 10:3
nable internet access)?
On 6/06/2014 8:39 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
>>
>> dpkg --list 'linux-image-*' \
>> | perl -ane 'BEGIN { $r = `uname -r` or die; chomp $r } print $F[1],
>> "\n" if $F[0] eq
auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On 4/06/2014 11:15 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Yes, it is in my nature to call a spade a spade. And you have already
> shown you have little background in Linux, as this post once again
> shows. Yet you refuse to even attemp
No, it's in Hollandais, as in Francois Hollande.
From: Curt
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: Post-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On 2014-06-06
Yes, you're Jerry alright, imposting as a Jap? LOL
From: Bzzz
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: Post-installation: how to auto-configure network adapter (ie.
enable internet access)?
On Fri, 6 Jun 20
1 - 100 of 346 matches
Mail list logo
