On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 04:29:28PM +0100, Emiel Metselaar wrote:
| On Tuesday 18 December 2001 16:29, dman wrote:
| > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 04:06:56PM +0100, Emiel Metselaar wrote:
| > ...
| >
| > | sys c:
| >
| > I did this once. Destroyed the disk! I don't recommend doing it
| > again.
|
...
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 16:29, dman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 04:06:56PM +0100, Emiel Metselaar wrote:
> ...
>
> | sys c:
>
> I did this once. Destroyed the disk! I don't recommend doing it
> again.
>
> The story :
> A few years back I acquired some antique hardware (Intel 8086
>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 04:06:56PM +0100, Emiel Metselaar wrote:
...
| sys c:
I did this once. Destroyed the disk! I don't recommend doing it
again.
The story :
A few years back I acquired some antique hardware (Intel 8086
system, also a 286 mobo+cpu and 25MB MFM hard disk, 2 360K
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 16:06, o polite wrote:
> Some time ago I tried to install the userfriendly OS Windows 98 on spare
> partition. Of course it succeded in rendering my laptop unusable. It took
> me two days to get my system back. This was four weeks ago, so now I'm
> ready for some more pa
Some time ago I tried to install the userfriendly OS Windows 98 on spare
partition. Of course it succeded in rendering my laptop unusable. It took me
two days to get my system back. This was four weeks ago, so now I'm ready for
some more pain.
Instead of letting the windows installer put it's
5 matches
Mail list logo